Self-Control of Task Difficulty During Early Practice Promotes Motor Skill Learning

REFERENCES

• Adams, J. A. (1971). Closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrieux, M., Danna, J., & Thon, B. (2012). Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. A. (1994). When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia, 32, 53–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrick, H. P., Noble, M., & Fitts, P. M. (1954). Extra task performance as a measure of learning a primary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 298–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastos, F. H., Marinovic, W., de Rugy, A., & Tani, G. (2013). Prior knowledge of final testing improves sensorimotor learning through self-scheduled practice. Human Movement Science, 32, 192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 15, 657–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin, A., Panzer, S., Salesse, R. N., & Blandin, Y. (2012). Testing promotes effector transfer. Acta Psychologica, 141, 400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Rose, D., & Dubrowski, A. (2010). Comparing self-guided learning and educator-guided learning formats for simulation-based clinical training. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 1832–1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Safir, O., & Dubrowski, A. (2009). How effective is self-guided learning of clinical technical skills? It's all about process. Medical Education, 43, 507–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., & Patterson, J. T. (2012). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science, 31, 1459–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel, G., Maquestiaux, F., Ruthruff, E., Didierjean, A., & Hartley, A. A. (2013). Novice motor performance: Better not to verbalize. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 20, 177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Hendrick, J. L., & Lidor, R. (2002). Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: The use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 43, 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., Qi, F., Gordon, J., & Schweighofer, N. (2008). Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Debaere, F., Wenderoth, N., Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P., & Swinnen, S. P. (2004). Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination task. Neuropsychologia, 42, 855–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyon, J., Bellec, P., Amsel, R., Penhune, V., Monchi, O., Carrier, J., Lehericy, S., & Benali, H. (2009). Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 199, 61–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyon, J., & Benali, H. (2005). Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 161–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversheim, U., & Bock, O. (2001). Evidence for processing stages in skill acquisition: A dual-task study. Learning and Memory, 8, 183–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Famose, J. P. (1990). Apprentissage moteur et difficulté de la tâche [Motor learning and task difficulty]. Paris, France: INSEP.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1964). Perceptual-motor skills learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243–285). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, I. M., & Romanow, S. K. (1993). Task specificity and the role of vision while learning to track. Human Performance, 6, 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• French, K. E., Rink, J. E., Rikard, L., Mays, A., Lynn, S., & Werner, P. (1991). The effects of practice progressions on learning two volleyball skills. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 261–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, P., & Ryan, L. (1990). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 16, 978–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. M. (2006). An investigation of learning advantages associated with self-control of the feedback schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, A44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. M. (2007). Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Perceptual Motor Skills, 104, 1005–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemayattalab, R. (2014). Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 2766–2772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, M., Camachon, C., Fernandez, L., Jacobs, D. M., & Montagne, G. (2009). Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention toward perceptual invariants. Human Movement Science, 28, 450–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, M., Jacobs, D. M., Camachon, C., Goulon, C., & Montagne, G. (2009). Self-controlled concurrent feedback facilitates the learning of the final approach phase in a fixed-base flight simulator. Human Factors, 51, 858–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle, C. M., Duley, A. R., & Coombes, S. A. (2004). Psychophysiological and related indices of attention during motor skill acquisition. In M. A. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport. Research, theory, and practice. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janelle, C. M., Kim, J. G., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual Motor Skills, 81, 627–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karni, A., Meyer, G., Rey-Hipolito, C., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). The acquisition of skilled motor performance: Fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 861–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keetch, K. M., & Lee, T. D. (2007). The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 476–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. R. (1969). What is adaptive training. Human Factors, 11, 547–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedijker, J. M., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., Oudejans, R. R. D., Beek, P. J., & Masters, R. S. W. (2011). Attention and time constraints in perceptual-motor learning and performance: Instruction, analogy, and skill level. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 245–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer, J. W., & Shadmehr, R. (2006). Consolidation of motor memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 29, 58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D. (1988). Transfer-appropriate processing- a framework for conceptualizing practice effects in motor learning. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behaviour: ‘The’ motor: Action controversy (pp. 201–215). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Lintern, G., & Gopher, D. (1978). Adaptive training of perceptual-motor-skills: Issues, results, and future directions. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 10, 521–551.
   Google Scholar
• Mané, A. M., Adams, J. A., & Donchin, E. (1989). Adaptive and part whole training in the acquisition of a complex perceptual-motor skill. Acta Psychologica, 71, 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNevin, N. H., Wulf, G., & Carlson, C. (2000). Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning: Implications for physical rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 80, 373–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
   Google Scholar
• Onla-or, S., & Winstein, C. J. (2008). Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 385–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passingham, R. E. (1996). Attention to action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B–Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1473–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew, R. W. (1966). Acquisition of hierarchical control over temporal organization of a skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 764–771.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Post, P. G., Fairbrother, J. T., & Barros, J. A. C. (2011). Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 474–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1988). The acquisition of task-specific productions and modification of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 117, 182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proteau, L. (1991). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and Motor Control. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Levesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning–evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A–Human Experimental Psychology, 44, 557–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proteau, L., Tremblay, L., & DeJaeger, D. (1998). Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: Support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remy, F., Wenderoth, N., Lipkens, K., & Swinnen, S. P. (2008). Acquisition of a new bimanual coordination pattern modulates the cerebral activations elicited by an intrinsic pattern: An fMRI study. Cortex, 44, 482–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remy, F., Wenderoth, N., Lipkens, K., & Swinnen, S. P. (2010). Dual-task interference during initial learning of a new motor task results from competition for the same brain areas. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2517–2527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning—a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2012). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). Schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260. doi:10.1037/H0076770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2014). Motor learning and performance. From principles to application (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & White, J. L. (1972). Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills: Test of Adams closed-loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: a review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37–66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (2001). Specificity of practice in a ball interception task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology—Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale, 55, 207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, H. T. A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Pijpers, J. R. (1995). Specificity of motor learning does not deny flexibility. Applied Psychology–An International Review—Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 44, 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williges, B. H., & Williges, R. C. (1977). Learner-centered versus automatic adaptive motor skill training. Journal Motor Behavior, 9, 325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Pein, R. L. (2002). Note on learners' control of the frequency of model presentation during skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 792–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. F. W., & Magill, R. A. (2011). Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 449–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G. (2007). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy, 93, 96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Clauss, A., Shea, C. H., & Whitacre, C. A. (2001). Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Research Quarterly for Exercice and Sport, 72, 299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Raupach, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (2005). Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercice and Sport, 76, 107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 1134–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Toole, T. (1999). Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercice and Sport, 70, 265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F. F., Maxwell, J. P., Hu, Y., Zhang, Z. G., Lam, W. K., Poolton, J. M., & Masters, R. S. W. (2010). EEG activity during the verbal-cognitive stage of motor skill acquisition. Biological Psychology, 84, 221–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar