1,315
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLE

On the Role of Error in Motor Learning

, , , , &
Pages 99-115 | Received 18 Dec 2014, Accepted 24 Apr 2015, Published online: 05 Jun 2015

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.
  • Armstrong, T. R. (1970). Feedback and perceptual-motor skill learning: A review of information feedback and manual guidance training techniques (Tech. Rep. No. 25). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Department of Psychology.
  • Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
  • Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bund, A., & Wiemeyer, J. (2004). Self-controlled learning of a complex motor skill: Effects of the learners' preferences on performance and self-efficacy. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 47, 215–136.
  • Fitts, P. M. (1964). Perceptual-motor skills learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243–285). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3–23.
  • Goh, H. T., Kantak, S. S., & Sullivan, K. J. (2012). Movement pattern and parameter learning in children: Effects of feedback frequency. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 346–352.
  • Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212–224.
  • Herrojo-Ruiz, M., Jabusch, H.-C., & Altenmuller, E. (2009). Detecting wrong notes in advance: Neuronal correlates of error monitoring in pianists. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2625–2639.
  • Hodges, N. J., & Campagnaro, P. (2012). Physical guidance research: Assisting principles and supporting evidence. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (2nd ed.; pp. 150–169). London, England: Routledge.
  • Huang, V. S., Shadmehr, R., & Diedrichsen, J. (2008). Active learning: Learning a motor skill without a coach. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100, 879–887.
  • James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Holt.
  • James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Holt.
  • Kelley, C. R. (1969). What is adaptive training? Human Factors, 11, 547–556.
  • Lee, T. D. (2012). Contextual interference: Generalizability and limitations. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice (2nd ed.; pp. 79–93). London, England: Routledge.
  • Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241–289.
  • Marteniuk, R. G. (1976). Information processing in motor skills. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 343–358.
  • Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. (2008). The theory or reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 160–183.
  • Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1049–1068.
  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103, 241–262.
  • Onla-or, S., & Winstein, C. J. (2008). Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 385–395.
  • Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2005). The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Human Movement Science, 24, 362–378.
  • Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 644–667.
  • Roediger, H. L. III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210.
  • Roediger, H. L. III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.
  • Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463.
  • Rushall, B. S., & Ford, D. (1982). Teaching backwards—an alternative skill instruction progression. CAHPER Journal, 48(5), 16–20.
  • Rushall, B. S., & Siedentop, D. (1972). The development and control of behavior in sports and physical education. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger.
  • Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
  • Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology: Movement Science and Sport Psychology, 3, 611. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611
  • Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
  • Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
  • Sherwood, D. E. (1988). Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 535–542.
  • Siedentop, D., & Rushall, B. S. (1972). An operant model for skill acquisition. Quest, 17, 82–90.
  • Simek, T. C., & O'Brien, R. M. (1981). Total golf: A behavioral approach to lowering your score and getting more out of your game. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Simek, T. C., & O'Brien, R. M. (1988). A chaining mastery, discrimination training program to teach Little Leaguers to hit a baseball. Human Performance, 1, 73–84.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines: From the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self-instruction. Science, 128, 969–977.
  • Tafarodi, R. W., Mehranvar, S., Panton, R. L., & Milne, A. B. (2002). Putting oneself in the task: Choice, personalization, and confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 648–658.
  • Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without “errors.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1–27.
  • Tullis, J. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Hanson, A. J. (2015). Scheduling scaffolding: The extent and arrangement of assistance during training impacts test performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, doi:10.1080/00222895.2015.1008686
  • Williams, E. J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research A, 2, 149–168.
  • Williges, R. C., & Williges, B. H. (1978). Critical variables in adaptive motor skills training. Human Factors, 20, 201–214.
  • Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 739–751.
  • Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.