Reaching for Objects or Asking for Them: Distance Estimation in 7- to 15-Year-Old Children

REFERENCES

• Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Costantini, M. (2012). Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1551–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbib, M. A., Bonaiuto, J. B., Jacobs, S., & Frey, S. H. (2009). Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector. Psychological Research, 73, 441–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2009). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in statistical data (3rd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. (1997). The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfiglioli, C., Finocchiaro, C., Gesierich, B., Rositani, F., & Vescovi, M. (2009). A kinematic approach to the conceptual representations of this and that. Cognition, 111, 270–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Cangelosi, A. (2014). Action and language integration: From humans to cognitive robots. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 344–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Scorolli, C. (2009). Language comprehension and hand motion simulation. Human Movement Science, 28, 12–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., Scorolli, C., Caligiore, D., Baldassarre, G., & Tummolini, L. (2013). The embodied mind extended: Words as social tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A.M., Gianelli, C., & Scorolli, C., (2010). Sentence comprehension: Effectors and goals, self and others. An overview of experiments and implications for robotics. Special topic edited by Angelo Cangelosi, Action and language integration in cognitive systems. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 4, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bullens, J., Klugkist, I., & Postma, A. (2011). The role of local and distal landmarks in the development of object location memory. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1515–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullens, J., Nardini, M., Doeller, C. F., Braddick, O., Postma, A., & Burgess, N. (2010). The role of landmarks and boundaries in the development of spatial memory. Development Science, 13, 170–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caçola, P., & Gabbard, C. (2012). Modulating peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space via tool use: A developmental perspective. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., Valdés, B., Castillo, A., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Language within your reach. Near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives. Cognition, 108, 889–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, J. A., Matsushima, E. H., Aznar-Casanova, J. A., & Ribeiro-Filho, N. P. (2006). Distance perception in a natural outdoor setting: is there a developmental trend to overconstancy? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9, 285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grave, D. D. J., Brenner, E., & Smeets J. B. J. (2011). Using a stick does not necessarily alter judged distances or reachability. PLoS One, 6(2), e16697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, G. (2014). Thinking in words: language as an embodied medium of thoughts. Topics Cog. Sci, 6, 371–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgin, F. H., Leonard-Solis, K., Masters, O., Schmelz, B., & Li, Z. (2012). Expert performance by athletes in the verbal estimation of spatial extents does not alter their perceptual metric of space. i-Perception, 3, 357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnè, A., Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., & Roy, A. C. (2011). Using tools to shape body and space representations. Proceedings of the XVIIth meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Farnè, A., Iriki, A., & Ladavas, E. (2005). Shaping multisensory action space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 43, 238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnè, A., & Ladavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11, 1645–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., & Zwaan, R. (2008). Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, F., & Butterworth, G. (1996). Pointing and social awareness: declaring and requesting in the second year. Journal of Child Language, 23, 307–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard, C., Caçola, P., & Cordova, A. (2009). Is perceived motor competence a constraint in children's action planning (estimating reach)? The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 170, 151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard, C., Cordova, A., & Ammar, D. (2007). Children's estimation of reach in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 749–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard, C., Cordova, A., & Lee, S. (2009). Do children perceive postural constraints when estimating reach (motor planning)? Journal of Motor Behavior, 41, 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilucci, M., Benuzzi, F., Bertolani, L., Daprati, E., & Gangitano, M. (2000). Language and motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 468–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilucci, M., Benuzzi, F., Bertolani, L., & Gangitano, M. (2001). Visual illusions and the control of children arm movements. Neuropsychologia, 39, 132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilucci, M., Dalla Volta, R., & Gianelli, C. (2008). When the hands speak. Journal de Physiologie, 102, 21–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giovannini, L., Jacomuzzi, A. C., Bruno, N., Semenza, C., & Surian, L. (2009). Distance perception in autism and typical development. Perception, 38, 429–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition comprehension and production. Cortex, 48, 905–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassman, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference. Developmental Science, 1, 252–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, J., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007) Graph-based visual saliency. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 545–552.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. F., Norton, L. M., & Roth, S. F. (1983). Children and adults' distance estimations in a large-scale environment: effects of time and clutter. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 453–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2007). What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness. Developmental Psychology, 43, 121–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Coding location: the view from toddler studies. American Psychologist, 63, 641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirak, D., Menz, M., Buccino, G., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2010). Grasping language. A short story on embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 711–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebal, K., Bennne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Infants use shared experience to interpret pointing gestures. Developmental Science, 12, 264–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2006). On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia, 44, 977–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007). Space perception and body morphology: Extent of near space scales with arm length. Experimental Brain Research, 177, 285–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenco, S. F., Longo, M. R., & Pathman, T. (2011). Near space and its relation to claustrophobic fear. Cognition, 119, 448–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, B. E., Skouteris, H., Day, R. H., Hartman, B., & Yonas, A. (1993). Effective action by infants to contact objects by reaching and leaning. Child Development, 64, 415–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or talking? Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language, 78, 143–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rival, C., Olivier, I., Ceyte, H, & Bard, C. (2004). Age-related differences in the visual processes implied in perception and action: Distance and location parameters. Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 107–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat, P. (1995). Perceived reachability for self and for others by 3- to 5-year-old children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 317–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat, P., & Wraga M.J. (1997). An account for the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 23(1), 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Scorolli, C. (2014). Embodiment and language. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 127–138). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. (2007). Sentence comprehension and action: Effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Research, 1130, 119–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Glenberg, A. M. (2009). Language-induced motor activity in bimanual object lifting. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serino, A., Annella, L., & Avenanti, A. (2009). Motor properties of peripersonal space in humans. PLoS One, 4(8), e6582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprent, P. (1998). Data driven statistical methods. London, England: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Toni, I., de Lange, F. P., Noordzij, M. L., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Language beyond action. Journal of Physiology–Paris, 102, 71–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tylèn, K., Weed, E., Wallentin, M., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Language as a tool for interacting minds. Mind and Language, 25, 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar