Obstacle Crossing Differences Between Blind and Blindfolded Subjects After Haptic Exploration

REFERENCES

• Afonso, A. L., Blum, A., Katz, B. F., Tarroux, P., Borst, G., & Denis, M. (2010). Structural properties of spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from haptic exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D audio virtual environment. Memory & Cognition, 38, 591–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.5.591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, C. H., Worchel, P., & Dallenbach, K. M. (1953). Facial vision: the perception of obstacles out of doors by blindfolded and blindfolded-deafened subjects. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 66, 519–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmead, D. H., Hill, E. W., & Talor, C. R. (1989). Obstacle perception by congenitally blind children. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 425–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, R., Best, R., Dell'Oro, L., & Taylor, S. (2007). Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. Gait & Posture, 25, 191–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. M., & Prentice, S. D. (2003). Swing phase kinetics and kinematics of knee replacement patients during obstacle avoidance. Gait & Posture, 18, 95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. C., Ashton-Miller, J. A., Alexander, N. B., & Schultz, A. B. (1991). Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology, 46, M196–M203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou, L. S., & Draganich, L. F. (1998). Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping. Journal of Biomechanics, 31, 685–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, D. B. (2014). The Glenn A. Fry award lecture 2013: blurred vision, spectacle correction, and falls in older adults. Optometry and Vision Science, 91, 593–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erni, T., & Dietz, V. (2001). Obstacle avoidance during human walking: learning rate and cross-modal transfer. The Journal of Physiology, 534, 303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng, J. J., Winter, D. A., & Patla, A. E. (1994). Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking. Experimental Brain Research, 102, 339–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forner-Cordero, A., Koopman, H. F. J. M., & van der Helm, F. C. T. (2004). Mechanical model of the recovery from stumbling. Biological Cybernetics, 91, 212–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forner-Cordero, A., Koopman, H. F. J. M., & van der Helm, F. C. T. (2014). Mechanical model of the recovery reaction from stumbling: effect of step length on trunk control. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical, 36, 491–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galna, B., Murphy, A. T., & Morris, M. E. (2010). Obstacle crossing in people with Parkinson's disease: foot clearance and spatiotemporal deficits. Human Movement Science, 29, 843–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallemans, A., Ortibus, E., Meire, F., & Aerts, P. (2010). Low vision affects dynamic stability of gait. Gait & Posture, 32, 547–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heasley, K., Buckley, J. G., Scally, A., Twigg, P., & Elliott, D. B. (2004). Stepping up to a new level: effects of blurring vision in the elderly. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 45, 2122–2128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnen, M. J., Muir, B. C., & Rietdyk, S. (2012). Factors leading to obstacle contact during adaptive locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 223, 219–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnen, M. J., Romine, N. L., Stumpf, D. M., & Rietdyk, S. (2014). Memory-guided obstacle crossing: more failures were observed for the trail limb versus lead limb. Experimental Brain Research 232, 2131–2142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hof, A. L., Gazendam, M. G., & Sinke, W. E. (2005). The condition for dynamic stability. Journal of Biomechanics, 38, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolarik, A. J., Cirstea, S., Pardhan, S., & Moore, B. C. (2014). A summary of research investigating echolocation abilities of blind and sighted humans. Hearing Research, 310, 60–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajoie, K., Bloomfield, L. W., Nelson, F. J., Suh, J. J., & Marigold, D. S. (2012). The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 2283–2293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loverro, K. L., Mueske, N. M., & Hamel, K. A. (2013). Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task. Journal of Biomechanics, 46, 1842–1850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, T. W., Chen, S. C., & Chiu, H. C. (2012). Best-compromise between mechanical energy expenditure and foot clearance predicts leading limb motion during obstacle-crossing. Gait & Posture, 36, 552–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marigold, D. S., & Drew, T. (2011 May). Contribution of cells in the posterior parietal cortex to the planning of visually guided locomotion in the cat: effects of temporary visual interruption. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 2457–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVea, D. A., & Pearson, K. G. (2006). Long-lasting memories of obstacles guide leg movements in the walking cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 26, 1175–1178.
   Google Scholar
• McVea, D. A., & Pearson, K. G. (2007). Stepping of the forelegs over obstacles establishes long-lasting memories in cats. Current Biology, 17, R621–R623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVea, D. A., Taylor, A. J., & Pearson, K. G. (2009). Long-lasting working memories of obstacles established by foreleg stepping in walking cats require area, 5 of the posterior parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 29, 9396–9404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohagheghi, A. A., Moraes, R., & Patla, A. E. (2004). The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 459–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes, R., Lewis, M. A., & Patla, A. E. (2004). Strategies and determinants for selection of alternate foot placement during human locomotion: influence of spatial and temporal constraints. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, B. C., Haddad, J. M., Heijnen, M. J., & Rietdyk, S. (2015). Proactive gait strategies to mitigate risk of obstacle contact are more prevalent with advancing age. Gait & Posture, 41, 233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, T. (1997). Quantitative analysis of gait in the visually impaired. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19, 194–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla, A. E. (1998). How is human gait controlled by vision. Ecological Psychology, 10, 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla, A. E., Davies, T. C., & Niechwiej, E. (2004). Obstacle avoidance during locomotion using haptic information in normally sighted humans. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 173–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla, A. E., & Greig, M. (2006). Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Neuroscience Letters. 397, 110–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla, A. E., & Prentice, S. D. (1995). The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion in humans. Experimental Brain Research, 106, 499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patla, A. E., & Rietdyk, S. (1993). Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width. Gait & Posture, 1, 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhea, C. K., & Rietdyk, S. (2007). Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory. Neuroscience Letters, 418, 60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S. T., Forner-Cordero, A., Garcia, V. D., Zago, P. F. P., & Ferasoli, H. (2009). Influence of visual information on optimal obstacle crossing. In J. V., Sloten, P., Verdonck, M., Nyssen, J., Haueisen (Eds.), International federation for medical and biological engineering proceedings (Vol. 22, pp. 2133–2137) Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, L. F., Rodrigues, S. T., & Forner-Cordero, A. (2014, August). Do humans walk like robots when crossing an obstacle without visual information? Paper presented at the 5th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Sáo Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, L. C., Moraes, R., & Patla, A. E. (2010). Visual feedforward control in human locomotion during avoidance of obstacles that change size. Motor Control, 14, 424–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillings, A. M., Van Wezel, B. M., Mulder, T., & Duysens, J. (1999). Widespread short-latency stretch reflexes and their modulation during stumbling over obstacles. Brain Research, 816, 480–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelow, E. R., & Brabyn, J. A. (1982). Locomotion of the blind controlled by natural sound cues. Perception, 11, 635–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmis, M. A., & Buckley, J. G. (2012). Obstacle crossing during locomotion: visual exproprioceptive information is used in an online mode to update foot placement before the obstacle but not swing trajectory over it. Gait & Posture, 36, 160–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnick, J. P. (2005). Adapted physical education and sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar