Subjective Estimation of Task Time and Task Difficulty of Simple Movement Tasks

References

• Annett, J., Golby, C. W., & Kay, H. (1958). The measurement of elements in an assembly task – the information output of the human motor system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, G. B., & Presgrave, R. (1958). Basic motion time study. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cerritelli, B., Maruff, P., Wilson, P., & Currie, J. (2000). The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 108, 91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., & Hoffmann, E. R. (2013). Subjective difficulty of movements with ongoing visual control. Journal of Motor Behavior, 45, 507–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?. Behavioural Brain Research, 72, 127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delignieres, D., & Brisswalter, J. (1996). The perception of difficulty and exertion in motor tasks: What can be known about perceptive continua through individual psychophysical exponents?. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 30, 213–239.
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, J. C. F. (2014). Why person models are important for human factors science. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics, 15, 595–614.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, L. A., Drury, C. G., & Helander, M. G. (1997). Operator-specific model: An assembly time prediction model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 7, 211–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gan, K. C., & Hoffmann, E. R. (1988). Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. Ergonomics, 31, 829–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geppinger, H. C. (1955). DMT dimensional motion times. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Grosjean, M., Shiffrar, M., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Fitts' law holds for action perception. Psychological Science, 18, 95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heremans, E., Smits-Englelsman, B., Caeynberghs, K., Vercruysse, S., Nieuwboer, A., Feys, P., & Helsen, W. F. (2011). Keeping an eye on imagery: The role of eye movements during motor imagery training. Neuroscience, 195, 37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyde, G. C. (1983). Modapts plus. Holland Park, Australia: Heyde Dynamics Pty.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R. (1997). Movement time of right- and left-handers using their preferred and non-preferred hands. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R. (2010). Naïve judgments of stimulus-response compatibility. Ergonomics, 53, 1061–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R., & Chan, A. H. S. (2012). Underwater movement times with ongoing visual control. Ergonomics, 55, 1513–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R., & Drury, C. G. (2012). Comment on “Visual layout modulates Fitts's law: The importance of first and last positions”. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 146–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R., Macdonald, W. A., & Almond, G. C. (1993). Quantification of the cognitive difficulty of mail sorting. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 11, 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 735–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, B. E., & Newell, A. (1990). Toward an engineering model of stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp 427–479). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kieras, D. (1988). Toward a practical GOMS model methodology for user interface design. Handbook of human-computer interaction, M. Helander (Eds.).
   Google Scholar
• Maruff, P., Wilson, P. H., De Fazio, J., Cerritelli, B., Hedt, A., & Currie, J. (1999). Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance. Neuropsychologica, 37, 379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, H. B., Stegermerton, G. J., & Schwab, J. L. (1948). Method time measurement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Paizis, C., Skoura, X., Personnier, P., & Papaxanthis, C. (2014). Motor asymmetry attenuation in older adults during imagined arm movements. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 5, article 49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaxanthis, C., Schieppati, M., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2002). Imagined and actual arm movements have similar bdurations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 447–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porro, C. A., Francescato, M. P., Cettolo, V., Diamond, M. E., Baraldi, P., Zuiani, C., & di Prampero, P. E. (1996). Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7688–7698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, J. H., Duncan, J. H., & Malcolm, J. A. (1962). Work factor time standards. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Radulescu, P. V., Adam, J. J., Fischer, M. H., & Pratt, J. (2010). Fitts's law violation and motor imagery: Are imagined movements truthful or lawful?. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 607–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub, K., Caragnano, G., Britzke, B., & Bruder, R. (2012). The European worksheet. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14(6), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., Cohen, L., Pillon, B., & Agid, Y. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564–1568. 96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slifkin, A. B., & Grilli, S. M. (2006). Aiming for the future: Prospective action difficulty, prescribed difficulty, and Fitts' law. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 746–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlauka, M. (2004). Display-control compatibility: The relation between performance and judgments of performance. Ergonomics, 47, 281–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westoff, J. F. (1964). In search of a measure of perceptual work. Phillips Technical Review, 25, 56–64.
   Google Scholar