REFERENCES
- Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966
- Derrick, E., & Dewar, R. (1970). Visual-tactual dominance relationship as a function of accuracy of tactual judgment. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 31, 935–939. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1970.31.3.935
- Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/415429a
- Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002
- Gepshtein, S., & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00133-7
- Hay, J. C., Pick, H. L. Jr., & Ikeda, K. (1965). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychonomic Science, 2, 215–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03343413
- Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception, 36, 1523–1533. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5851
- Hershberger, W. A., & Misceo, G. F. (1996). Touch dominates haptic estimates of discordant visual-haptic size. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 58, 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206838
- Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: the number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014164
- Jovanovic, B., & Drewing, K. (2014). The influence of intersensory discrepancy on visuo-haptic integration is similar in 6-year-olds and adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00057
- Klein, R. E. (1966). A developmental study of perception under conditions of conflicting sensory cues. Dissertation Abstracts, 27, 2162B–2163B. (University Microfilms No. 66-12213)
- McDonnell, P. M., & Duffett, J. (1972). Vision and touch: a reconsideration of conflict between the two senses. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082425
- McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992). A common language effect size statistic. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361
- Misceo, G. F., Jackson, S. R. V., & Perdue, J. R. (2014). Again, knowledge of common source fails to promote visual-haptic integration. Perceptual & Motor Skills: Perception, 118, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.2466/24.23.PMS.118k11w0
- Rock, I., & Victor, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594–596. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3606.594
- Takahashi, C., & Watt, S. J. (2014). Visual-haptic integration with pliers and tongs: Signal “weights” take account of changes in haptic sensitivity caused by different tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00109
- Van Doorn, G. H., Richardson, B. L., Wuillemin, D. B., & Symmons, M. A. (2010). Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.3.813
- Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.638