Do Perceptual Instructions Lead to Enhanced Performance Relative to Behavioral Instructions?

REFERENCES

• Annett, J., & Duncan, K. D. (1967). Task analysis and training design. Occupational Psychology, 41, 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1996). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issue of stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. Advances in psychology, 118, 281–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Codes and their vicissitudes. Behavioral and brain sciences, 24, 910–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & De Guzman, G. C. (1988). Order in time: How the cooperation between the hands informs the design of the brain. In H. Haken (Ed.), Neural and synergetic computers (pp. 180–196). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kilduski, N. C., & Rice, M. S. (2003). Qualitative and quantitative knowledge of results: effects on motor learning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers, M., Wulf, G., Wallmann, H., & Guadagnoli, M. (2005). An external focus of attention attenuates balance impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease who have a fall history. Physiotherapy, 91, 152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marken, R. S. (1999). PERCOLATe: perceptual control analysis of tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, 481–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechsner, F., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Do muscles matter for coordinated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 490–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural networks, 9, 1265–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., E. Galanter, & K. H. Pribram. 1960. Plans and the structure of behavior. London, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, D. L., & Harris, D. (2014). Perceptual control and feedback control in the analysis of complex tasks. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 15, 505–516.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, J. L. (1991). Application of motor learning principles in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 531–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, W. T. (1978). Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review, 85, 417–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Buchanan, J. J., & Kennedy, D. M. (2015). Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 361–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 272–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory SR compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totsika, V., & Wulf, G. (2003). The influence of external and internal foci of attention on transfer to novel situations and skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 220–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Rijt-Plooij, H. H., & Plooij, F. X. (1992). Infantile regressions: Disorganization and the onset of transition periods. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 10, 129–149.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, P. M., & Wulf, G. (2006). Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence?. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C., Brouwer, B. J., & Culham, E. G. (2000). Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Physical Therapy, 80, 886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. D., Collins, D. R., & Bingham, G. P. (2005). Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: stable perception leads to stable action. Experimental Brain Research, 164, 517–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G. (2007). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 10 years of research. Bewegung und Training. Retrieved from http://sportwissenschaft.de/fileadmin/img/publikationen/BuT/aktuelles/Wulf_target_article_2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Höß, M., & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1382–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54, 1143–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Mercer, J., McNevin, N., & Guadagnoli, M. A. (2004). Reciprocal influences of attentional focus on postural and suprapostural task performance. Journal of motor behavior, 36(2), 189–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Zachry, T., Granados, C., & Dufek, J. (2007). Increases in jump-and-reach height through an external focus of attention. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2, 275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: Challenging tradition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 637–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachry, T., Wulf, G., Mercer, J., & Bezodis, N. (2005). Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Research Bulletin, 67(4), 304–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar