I Spy With My Dominant Eye

REFERENCES

• Banister, H. (1935). A study of eye dominance. British Journal of Psychology, 26, 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Beaubaton, D., & Hay, L. (1986). Contribution of visual information to feedforward and feedback processes in rapid pointing movements. Human Movement Science, 5, 19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, M. F., Elliott, K. M., Watt, S. J., Hibbard, P. B., Davies, I. R. L., & Simpson, P. J. (2004). Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spatial Vision, 17, 95–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlton, L. G. (1981). Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1019–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coull, J. A., Weir, P., Tremblay, L., Weeks, D., & Elliott, D. (2000). Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 347–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. D., Helsen, W. F., Buekers, M. J., Hesketh, K. L., Starkes, J. L., & Elliott, D. (2001). The utilization of visual information in the control of reciprocal aiming movements. Human Movement Science, 20, 807–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crider, B. (1943). The importance of the dominant eye. Journal of Psychology, 16, 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Coren, S. (1999). Sensorimotor performance as a function of eye dominance and handedness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 424–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 563–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., & Chua, R. (1996). Manual asymmetries in goal-directed movement. In D. Elliott & E. A. Roy (Eds.), Manual asymmetries in motor performance (pp. 143–156). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., Hansen, S., Grierson, L. E., Lyons, J., Bennett, S. J., & Hayes, S. J. (2010). Goal-directed aiming: Two components but multiple processes. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1023–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodale, M. A., Pélisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., Tremblay, L., & Elliott, D. (2008). Real-time manipulation of visual displacement during manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 27, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, M. (2005). Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control, 9, 281–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, M., Neely, K., & Krigolson, O. (2008). Response modes influence the accuracy of monocular and binocular reaching movements. Motor Control, 12, 252–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy, A., Bhattacharjee, A., Hansen, S., Reid, C., & Tremblay, L. (2015). Online vision as a function of real-time limb velocity: Another case for optimal windows. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47, 465–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., Lawrence, G. P., Chua, R., Bernier, P. M., … & Weeks, D. J. (2006). Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 1106–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan, D., Manson, G., Heath, M., Tremblay, L., & Welsh, T. N. (2016). Corrections in saccade endpoints scale to the amplitude of target displacements in a double-step paradigm. Neuroscience Letters, 611, 46–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, A., Servos, P., Goodale, M. A., Mendarozqueta, N., & Mon-Williams, M. (2004). When two eyes are better than one in prehension: Monocular viewing and end-point variance. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 317–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, F. H. (1932). The dependence of eye-hand coordinations upon eye-dominance. The American Journal of Psychology, 44, 756–762.
   Google Scholar
• Melmoth, D. R., & Grant, S. (2006). Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, W. R. (1930). Ocular dominance in human adults. The Journal of General Psychology, 3, 412–430.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P. (1987). A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 449–456.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porac, C., & Coren, S. (1976). The dominant eye. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 880–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainburg, R. L., & Kalakanis, D. (2000). Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2661–2675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, R. H. (1976). Visual Fields. In: H. K. Walker, W. D. Hall, & J. W. Hurst, (Eds.), Clinical methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations (pp. 565–572). Boston, MA: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Tapley, S. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1985). A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia, 23, 215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, L., Crainic, V. A., de Grosbois, J., Bhattacharjee, A., Kennedy, A., Hansen, S., & Welsh, T. N. (2017). An optimal velocity for online limb-target regulation processes? Experimental Brain Research, 235, 29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, L., Hansen, S., Kennedy, A., & Cheng, D. T. (2013). The utility of vision during action: Multiple visuomotor processes? Journal of Motor Behavior, 45, 91–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1–119.
   Google Scholar
• Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & Kisselburgh, L. (1983). Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 217–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar