Unconscious Semantic Priming Influences Performance of Visuomotor Tasks Differently but the Effects are Similar in Young and Older Adults

References

• Alahyane, N., Salemme, R., Urquizar, C., Cotti, J., Guillaume, A., Vercher, J.-L., & Pélisson, D. (2007). Oculomotor plasticity: Are mechanisms of adaptation for reactive and voluntary saccades separate? Brain Research, 1135, 107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholology, 71(2), 230–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19(9), 967–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beurskens, R., & Bock, O. (2012). Age-related decline of peripheral visual rocessing: The role of eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 217(1), 117–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, O. (2005). Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 160(2), 259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, O., Grigorova, V., & Ilieva-Staneva, M. (2017). Adaptation of reactive saccades is influenced by unconscious priming of the attention focus. Journal of Motor Behavior, 49(5), 477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, O., Ilieva, M., & Grigorova, V. (2014). Effects of old age and resource demand on double-step adaptation of saccadic eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 232(9), 2821–2826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, O., Schmitz, G., & Grigorova, V. (2008). Transfer of adaptation between ocular saccades and arm movements. Human Movement Science, 27(3), 383–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisova, S., & Grigorova, V. (2015). Effect of global/local attention priming on saccadic eye movement adaptation in elder and young persons: Preliminary results. Comptes Rendus de L'Academie Bulgare Des Sciences, 68(9), 1161–1166.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deubel, H. (1987). Adaptivity of gain and direction in oblique saccades. In J. K. O'Regan, & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.). Eye movements: From physiology to cogntition (pp. 181–190). Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Doré-Mazars, K., & Collins, T. (2005). Saccadic adaptation shifts the pre-saccadic attention focus. Experimental Brain Research, 162(4), 537–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & James, J. D. S. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversheim, U., & Bock, O. (2001). Evidence for processing stages in skill acquisition: A dual-task study. Learning & Memory, (8(4), 183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gancarz, G., & Grossberg, S. (1999). A neural model of saccadic eye movement control explains task-specific adaptation. Vision Research, 39(18), 3123–3143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos, A. P. (2000). Neural aspects of cognitive motor control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10(2), 238–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos, A. P., Lurito, J. T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A. B., & Massey, J. T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243(4888), 234–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorova, V., Bock, O., Borisova, S., Ilieva, M., & Schmitz, G. (2010). Double-step adaptation of saccade directions. Comparison of constant and saccade-triggered interstep intervals. Comptes Rendus de L'Academie Bulgare Des Sciences, 63, 157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorova, V., Petkova, G., & Bock, O. (2006). On the distribution of attention in a visuo-manual adaptation task. Experimental Brain Research, 175(4), 754–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttermann, S., Bock, O., & Memmert, D. (2012). The breadth of attention in old age. Ageing Research, 4, 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttermann, S., Bock, O., & Memmert, D. (2014). Subliminal primes for global or local processing influence judgments of vehicular traffic. Consciousness and Cognition, 29, 230–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, H. A., van Donkelaar, P., Cole, J., Vercher, J.-L., Gauthier, G. M., & Miall, R. C. (2000). The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Experimental Brain Research, 132(1), 114–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahnemann, D. (1973). Attention and effort. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., Adams, S. C., & Zovko, M. (2012). Attentional sensitization of unconscious visual processing: Top-down influences on masked priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(1), 50–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, C., & Pelletier, L. G. (2003). On the investigation of primed and chronic autonomous and heteronomous motivational orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1570–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, U., Ansorge, U., & Kiefer, M. (2011). Controlling the unconscious attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially. Psychological Science, 22(2), 282–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, S. C. (1967). Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements. Perception Psychophysics, 2(8), 359–362.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, E., & Willingham, D. (1998). Deficit in learning of a motor skill requiring strategy, but not of perceptualmotor recalibration, with aging. Learning & Memory, 4, 411–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, N. G., Bartelt, O. A., Donner, T. H., Villringer, A., & Brandt, S. A. (2003). A physiological correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(9), 3561–3565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, G., Clark, S., & Wallace, B. (1985). Attention and prism adaptation. Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1996). Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22(2), 379–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidler, R. D., Bernard, J. A., Burutolu, T. B., Fling, B. W., Gordon, M. T., Gwin, J. T., Kwak, Y., & … Ipps, B. D. (2010). Motor control and aging: Links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, (5), 721–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straube, A., Deubel, H., Ditterich, J., & Eggert, T. (2001). Cerebellar lesions impair rapid saccade amplitude adaptation. Neurology, 57(11), 2105–2108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple task performance (pp. 3–34). London: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
   Google Scholar