76
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Imitation of Touching Dangerous Animals Triggers Motor Inhibition in a Primed Target Grasping-Categorization Task

, , , , , & show all
Pages 410-422 | Received 10 Oct 2022, Accepted 17 May 2023, Published online: 24 May 2023

REFERENCES

  • Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.001
  • Anelli, F., Ranzini, M., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2013). Perceiving object dangerousness: An escape from pain? Experimental Brain Research, 228(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3577-2
  • Bai, L., Ma, H., Huang, Y., & Luo, Y. (2005). The development of native Chinese affective picture system—A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19, 719–722.
  • Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 59(8), 1484–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000204
  • Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351
  • Cao, R., Cao, G., & Liu, P. (2020). Increasing perceptual salience diminishes the motor interference effect from dangerous objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00580
  • Cao, G., & Liu, P. (2021). Arousal modulates the motor interference effect stimulated by pictures of threatening animals. PeerJ, 9, e10876. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10876
  • Caravaglios, G., Costanzo, E., Palermo, F., & Muscoso, E. G. (2008). Decreased amplitude of auditory event-related delta responses in Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 70(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.04.004
  • Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the “negativity bias”, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 41(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1
  • Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano-Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012). Theta lingua franca: A common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology, 49(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x
  • Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: How do we manage threatening objects? Cognitive Processing, 13(S1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0470-z
  • Cohen, M. X. (2011). Error-related medial frontal theta activity predicts cingulate-related structural connectivity. NeuroImage, 55(3), 1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.072
  • Correll, J., Urland, G. R., & Ito, T. A. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.02.006
  • de Cesarei, A., & Codispoti, M. (2011). Affective modulation of the LPP and α-ERD during picture viewing. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1397–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01204.x
  • Decety, J., Yang, C. Y., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroImage, 50(4), 1676–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.025
  • Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trail EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
  • Ergen, M., Saban, S., Kirmizi-Alsan, E., Uslu, A., Keskin-Ergen, Y., & Demiralp, T. (2014). Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 94(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.08.177
  • Folstein, J. R., & van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hanslmayr, S., Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K.-H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., & Klimesch, W. (2008). The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20020
  • Harper, J., Malone, S. M., & Bernat, E. M. (2014). Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025
  • Herd, S. A., Banich, M. T., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2006). Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: an integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892906775250012
  • Huster, R. J., Enriquez-Geppert, S., Lavallee, C. F., Falkenstein, M., & Herrmann, C. S. (2013). Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001
  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science (New York, N.Y.), 286(5449), 2526–2528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5449.2526
  • Kaestner, E. J., & Polich, J. (2011). Affective recognition memory processing and event-related brain potentials. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0023-4
  • Kamarajan, C., Porjesz, B., Jones, K. A., Choi, K., Chorlian, D. B., Padmanabhapillai, A., Rangaswamy, M., Stimus, A. T., & Begleiter, H. (2004). The role of brain oscillations as functional correlates of cognitive systems: A study of frontal inhibitory control in alcoholism. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 51(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPSYCHO.2003.09.004
  • Karakaş, S. (2020). A review of theta oscillation and its functional correlates. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 157, 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.008
  • Kirmizi-Alsan, E., Bayraktaroglu, Z., Gurvit, H., Keskin, Y. H., Emre, M., & Demiralp, T. (2006). Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Brain Research, 1104(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010
  • Klimesch, W. (1999). Full-length review EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2–3), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3
  • Knyazev, G. G. (2007). Motivation, emotion, and their inhibitory control mirrored in brain oscillations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 31(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.10.004
  • Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskoj-Plusnin, J. Y., & Bocharov, A. V. (2009). Event-related delta and theta synchronization during explicit and implicit emotion processing. Neuroscience, 164(4), 1588–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.057
  • Liu, P. (2018). Time-frequency analysis of event-related potentials associated with the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects. Brain Research, 1682, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.005
  • Liu, P., Cao, R., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). Response inhibition or evaluation of danger? An event-related potential study regarding the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects. Brain Research, 1664, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.025
  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x
  • Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford University Press.
  • Meng, X., Liu, W., Zhang, L., Li, X., Yao, B., Ding, X., Yuan, J. J., & Yang, J. (2016). EEG oscillation evidences of enhanced susceptibility to emotional stimuli during adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00616
  • Messerotti Benvenuti, S., Buodo, G., & Palomba, D. (2017). Appetitive and aversive motivation in dysphoria: A time-domain and time-frequency study of response inhibition. Biological Psychology, 125, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.007
  • Mouraux, A., & Iannetti, G. D. (2008). Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 26(7), 1041–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.011
  • Mustile, M., Giocondo, F., Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., & Kourtis, D. (2021). Motor inhibition to dangerous objects: Electrophysiological evidence for task-dependent aversive affordances. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(5), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01690
  • Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society, 9(4), 456–479. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002
  • Schneider, T. R., Hipp, J. F., Domnick, C., Carl, C., Büchel, C., & Engel, A. K. (2018). Modulation of neuronal oscillatory activity in the beta- and gamma-band is associated with current individual anxiety levels. NeuroImage, 178, 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.059
  • Schubring, D., & Schupp, H. T. (2019). Affective picture processing: Alpha‐ and lower beta‐band desynchronization reflects emotional arousal. Psychophysiology, 56, e13386. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13386
  • Subra, B., Muller, D., Fourgassie, L., Chauvin, A., & Alexopoulos, T. (2018). Of guns and snakes: Testing a modern threat superiority effect*. Cognition & Emotion, 32(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1284044
  • Thill, S., Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., Ziemke, T., & Baldassarre, G. (2013). Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(3), 491–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.012
  • Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000144
  • Vainio, L., Alén, H., Hiltunen, S., Lehikoinen, K., Lindbäck, H., Patrikainen, A., & Paavilainen, P. (2013). Response inhibition triggered by the briefly viewed image of a hand: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 51(3), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.004
  • Vainio, L., & Mustonen, T. (2011). Mapping the identity of a viewed hand in the motor system: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021432
  • Verleger, R. (2020). Effects of relevance and response frequency on P3b amplitudes: Review of findings and comparison of hypotheses about the process reflected by P3b. Psychophysiology, 57(7), e13542. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13542
  • Viggiano, M. P., & Kutas, M. (2000). Overt and covert identification of fragmented objects inferred from performance and electrophysiological measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.107
  • Vinogradova, O. S. (2001). Hippocampus as comparator: Role of the two input and two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of information. Hippocampus, 11(5), 578–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.1073
  • Volpe, U., Mucci, A., Bucci, P., Merlotti, E., Galderisi, S., & Maj, M. (2007). The cortical generators of P3a and P3b: A LORETA study. Brain Research Bulletin, 73(4–6), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.03.003
  • Yamanaka, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2010). Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(4), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21258
  • Yener, G. G., Emek-Savaş, D. D., Lizio, R., Çavuşoğlu, B., Carducci, F., Ada, E., Güntekin, B., Babiloni, C. C., & Başar, E. (2016). Frontal delta event-related oscillations relate to frontal volume in mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 103, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.005
  • Yener, G., Güntekin, B., & Başar, E. (2008). Event-related delta oscillatory responses of Alzheimer patients. European Journal of Neurology, 15(6), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02100.x
  • Yiend, J., & Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755991
  • Zhang, W., Lu, J., Liu, X., Fang, H., Li, H., Wang, D., & Shen, J. (2013). Event-related synchronization of delta and beta oscillations reflects developmental changes in the processing of affective pictures during adolescence. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 90(3), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.10.005
  • Zsido, A. N., Deak, A., & Bernath, L. (2019). Is a snake scarier than a gun? the ontogenetic-phylogenetic dispute from a new perspective: The role of arousal. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 19(4), 726–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000478
  • Zsidó, A. N., Stecina, D. T., Cseh, R., & Hout, M. C. (2022). The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 113(2), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12540

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.