Dual-Task and Single-Task Practice Does Not Influence the Attentional Demands of Movement Sequence Representations

REFERENCES

• Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapi, R. S., Doya, K., & Harner, A. M. (2000). Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 13(3), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001504-200005000-00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A., & Kiefer, M. (2021). Comparison of different response time outlier exclusion methods: A simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(June), 675558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr, B. M., Etnier, J. L., & Fisher, K. M. (2013). Examining the time course of attention in a Soccer Kick using a dual task paradigm. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22(1), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscimagna-Hemminger, S. E., Donchin, O., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Shadmehr, R. (2003). Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89(1), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00622.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppone, A. V., Semprini, M., & Konczak, J. (2018). Consolidation of human somatosensory memory during motor learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 347, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyon, J., Gabitov, E., Vahdat, S., Lungu, O., & Boutin, A. (2018). Current issues related to motor sequence learning in humans. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ells, J. G. (1973). Analysis of temporal and attentional aspects of movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034740
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eversheim, U., & Bock, O. (2001). Evidence for processing stages in skill acquisition: A dual-task study. Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 8(4), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.39301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 3–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, H. T., Gordon, J., Sullivan, K. J., & Winstein, C. J. (2014). Evaluation of attentional demands during motor learning: Validity of a dual-task probe paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2013.868337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, H. T., Sullivan, K. J., Gordon, J., Wulf, G., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Dual-task practice enhances motor learning: A preliminary investigation. Experimental Brain Research, 222(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3206-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, H. (1996). Dual-task performance. In O. Neumann & A. S. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 3). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5822(96)80021-1
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (1996). Secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 59(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01792433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikosaka, O., Nakahara, H., Rand, M. K., Sakai, K., Lu, X., Nakamura, K., Miyachi, S., & Doya, K. (1999). Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends in Neurosciences, 22(10), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01439-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., Sakai, K., & Nakahara, H. (2002). Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12(2), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00307-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraga, C. Y., Garry, M. I., Carson, R. G., & Summers, J. J. (2009). Dual-task interference: Attentional and neurophysiological influences. Behavioural Brain Research, 205(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110(2), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1995.9941696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-an integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, A. J., Han, D. W., & Shea, C. H. (2009). Representation of movement sequences is related to task characteristics. Acta Psychologica, 132(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, A. J., Mühlbauer, T., & Shea, C. H. (2009). The coding and effector transfer of movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer, J. W., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (1999). Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/14826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, R. K., Godde, B., & Braun, C. (2004). EEG correlates of coordinate processing during intermanual transfer. Experimental Brain Research, 159(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1942-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinen, P., Shea, C. H., & Panzer, S. (2015). The impact of concurrent visual feedback on coding of on-line and pre-planned movement sequences. Acta Psychologica, 155, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Wright, D. L. (2000). An assessment of the attention demands during random- and blocked-practice schedules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2017). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Massing, M., Blandin, Y., & Panzer, S. (2018). The influence of eye-movements on the development of a movement sequence representation during observational and physical practice. Acta Psychologica, 182, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Nissen, Bullemer – 1987 – Attention requirements of learning evidence from performance measures.pdf. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzer, S., Muehlbauer, T., Krueger, M., Buesch, D., Naundorf, F., & Shea, C. H. (2009). Short article: Effects of interlimb practice on coding and learning of movement sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 62(7), 1265–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802671370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., & Shea, C. H. (2005). Sequence learning: Response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 387–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, C., Panzer, S., & Shea, C. H. (2023). Attentional demand of a movement sequence guided by visual-spatial and by motor representations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 55(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2022.2101424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1969). Reduced attention and the performance of “automated” movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1969.10734850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60(1–2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E. H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138(2), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, V. A., Thomas, A., Mrotek, L. A., Casadio, M., & Scheidt, R. A. (2023). Extended training improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 241(2), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06533-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Kennedy, D., & Panzer, S. (2019). Information processing approach to understanding and improving physical performance. APA Handbook of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Volume 1: Sport Psychology, 1(1), 557–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000123-028
   Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Kovacs, A. J., & Panzer, S. (2011). The coding and inter-manual transfer of movement sequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, C. H., Panzer, S., & Kennedy, D. M. (2016). Effector transfer. In F. Loffing, N. Hagemann, B. Strauss, & C. MacMahon (Eds.), Laterality in Sports: Theories and Applications (1st ed., pp. 179–203). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801426-4.00009-2
   Google Scholar
• Soechting, J. F., & Flanders, M. (1992). Moving in three-dimensional space: Frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15(1), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.15.1.167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stets, A., Smith, S. L., & Helton, W. S. (2020). Dual-task interference between swimming and verbal memory. Human Factors, 62(7), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819871743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T. (2020). The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01619-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Salminen, T., Karbach, J., & Schubert, T. (2014). Practice-related optimization and transfer of executive functions: A general review and a specific realization of their mechanisms in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 78(6), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0563-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (1995). A forthcoming key press can be selected while earlier ones are executed. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1995.9941717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey, W. B. (2001). Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica, 106(1–2), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00027-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke, J. T., & Vaughn, S. C. (1976). Temporal distribution of attention during a throwing motion. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1976.10735058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105(3), 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.105.3.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K., Ashe, J., & Willingham, D. T. (2008). An egocentric frame of reference in implicit motor sequence learning. Psychological Research, 72(5), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0129-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research. Gait & Posture, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00156-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C. A., & Shea, C. H. (1978). Shifts in attention demands and motor program utilization during motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1978.10735148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar