XIX.—A synopsis of the suborders and families of Teleostean fishes

References

• 1885 . Morphol. Jahrb. , x : 22 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• For the nomenclature of these ossicles, cf. Bridge Haddon Proc. Roy. Soc. 1889 xlvi 310 310
   Google Scholar
• 1902 . Quart. Journ. Micr. Sic. , xlv : 503 – 503 .
   Google Scholar
• 1902 . Ann. Sci. Nat. , xiv ( 8 ) : 197 – 197 .
   Google Scholar
• 1902 . Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. , x ( 7 ) : 147 – 147 .
   Google Scholar
• Starks , E. C. 1902 . P. U.S. Nat. Mus. , xxv : 619 – 619 . in an important paperhas shown that the so-called “infraclavicle” of sticklebacks and allies does not exist as a distinct element.
   Google Scholar
• 1903 . Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. , xxvi : 915 – 915 .
   Google Scholar
• Swinnerton . 1902 . Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. , xlv : 554 – 554 . has pointed out that the skull of the Scombresoces belongs to what he terms the Acrartete typ.e (e. g. in which the attachment, of the palatine, cartilage or its derivates is confined to the pre-ethmoid cornua), whilst the other Percesoces examined by him, as well as the Cyprinodonts, are Disartete (the attachment being at the par-ethmoid and pre-ethmoid cornua) ; but the character is so indistinctly defined in some adult Cyprinodonts, that I feet some diffidence in making use of this character for systematic purposes in the present state of our knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• 1902 . Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. , x ( 7 ) : 295 – 295 .
   Google Scholar
• 1903 . Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. , xi : 460 – 460 .
   Google Scholar
• Cf. Thilo Zool. Anz. 1902 305 305
   Google Scholar
• Cf. Boulenger Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 1902 x 7 295 295
   Google Scholar
• 1901 . Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. , viii ( 7 ) : 261 – 261 .
   Google Scholar
• 1903 . Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. , xi : 459 – 459 .
   Google Scholar
• 1850 . Ann. Sci. Nat., Zool. , xiv ( 3 ) : 105 – 105 . C. R. Ac. Sci. lxxiv. 1872, p. 1527.
   Google Scholar
• 1902 . P. Z. S. , ii : 284 – 284 .
   Google Scholar