Aspects of the natural history of Leptodactylus knudseni Heyer, 1972 (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in a pristine forest in Central Amazonia, Brazil, with comments on ontogenetic variation of its tadpoles

References

• Altig R, McDiarmid RW. 1999. Body plan: development and morphology. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, editors. Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press; p. 24–51.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell JP, Lopez PT. 1989. Foam-generating behavior in tadpoles of Leptodactylus mystaceus. Copeia. 1989:498–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis SL, Davis RB, James A, Talyn BCP. 2000. Reproductive behavior and larval development of Leptodactylus fallax in Dominica, West Indies. Herpetological Review. 31:217–220.
   Google Scholar
• de Sá RO, Grant T, Camargo A, Heyer RW, Ponssa ML, Stanley E. 2014. Systematics of the Neotropical Genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae): Phylogeny, the relevance of non-molecular evidence, and species accounts. South American Journal of Herpetology. 9:1–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie JR. 1984. How Leptodactylus fuscus tadpoles make foam, and why. Copeia. 1984:778–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE. 1978. The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publication. 65:1–352.
   Google Scholar
• Duellman WE. 2005. Cusco Amazónico – the lives of amphibians and reptiles in an Amazonian rainforest. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; p. 251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Gascon C. 1991. Breeding of Leptodactylus knudseni: responses to rainfall variation. Copeia. 1991:248–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaretta AA, Kokubum MNC. 2004. Reproductive ecology of Leptodactylus furnarius Sazima & Bokermann, 1978, a frog that lays eggs in underground chambers (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Herpetozoa. 16:115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson RC, Buley KR. 2004. Maternal care and obligatory oophagy in Leptodactylus fallax: a new reproductive mode in frogs. Copeia. 2004:128–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica. 16:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience. 55:207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hero JM. 1990. An illustrated key to tadpoles occurring in the Central Amazon rainforest, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Amazoniana. 11(2):201–262.
   Google Scholar
• Hero JM, Galatti U. 1990. Characteristics distinguishing Leptodactylus pentadactylus and L. knudseni in the Central Amazon Rainforest. Journal of Herpetology. 24(2):226–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer MM, Heyer WR, de Sá RO. 2011. Leptodactylus pentadactylus (Laurenti) Smoky Jungle Frog. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 887:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR. 1969. The adaptive ecology of the species groups of the genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Evolution. 23:421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer WR. 1979. Systematics of the pentadactylus species group of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Smithson Contributions to Zoology. 301:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR. 1995. South American rocky habitat Leptodactylus (Amphibia: Anura: leptodactylidae) with description of two new species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 108(4):695–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer WR. 2005. Variation and taxonomic clarification of the large species of the Leptodactylus pentadactylus species group (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) from Middle America, northern South America, and Amazonia. Arquivos De Zoologia. 37:269–348.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR, Heyer MM. 2001. Leptodactylus lithonaetes Heyer. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 723:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR, Heyer MM. 2006. Leptodactylus knudseni Heyer Knudsen’s Thin-toed Frog. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 807:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer WR, Thompson AS. 2000. Leptodactylus rugosus Noble. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 708:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hödl W. 1990. Biology and physiology of Amphibians. Stuttgart and New York, Fotschritte der Zoologie: W Hanke, Reproductive diversity in Amazonian lowland frogs; p. 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser H. 1994. Leptodactylus fallax. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 583:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Kokubum MNC, Giaretta AA. 2005. Reproductive ecology and behaviour of a species of Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylinae) with endotrophic tadpoles: systematic implications. Journal of Natural History. 39:1745–1758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey LA. 1979. Predação em girinos por uma vespa e outras associações de insetos com ninhos de duas espécies de rãs da Amazônia. Acta Amazonica. 9:755–762.
   Google Scholar
• Lescure J, Letellier F. 1983. Reproduction en captivité de Leptodactylus fallax Müller, 1926 (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Revue Française d’Aquariologie. 10:61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Lima AP, Magnusson WE, Menin M, Erdtmann LK, Rodrigues DJ, Keller C, Hödl W. 2012. Guia de sapos da Reserva Adolpho Ducke, Amazônia Central [Guide to the frogs to Reserva Adolpho Ducke, Central Amazonia]. Manaus: INPA.
   Google Scholar
• Marques-Filho AO, Ribeiro MNG, Santos HM, Santos JM. 1981. Estudos climatológicos da Reserva Florestal Ducke – Manaus – AM. IV. Precipitação. Acta Amazônica. 11:759–768.
   Google Scholar
• Martins M. 1993. Observations on nest dynamics and embryonic and larval development in the nest building gladiator forg, Hyla faber. Amphibia-Reptilia. 14:411–421.
   Google Scholar
• Menin M, Giaretta AA. 2003. Predation on foam nests of leptodactylinae frogs (Anura: Leptodactylidae) by larvae of Beckeriella niger (Diptera: Ephydridae). Journal of Zoology. 261:239–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menin M, Lima AP, Rodrigues DJ. 2010. The tadpole of Leptodactylus pentadactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Central Amazonia. Zootaxa. 2508:65–68.
   Google Scholar
• Menin M, Waldez F, Lima AP. 2008. Temporal variation in the abundance and number of species of frogs in 10,000 ha of a forest in Central Amazonia, Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology. 3:68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Muedeking MH, Heyer WR. 1976. Description of eggs and reproductive patterns of Leptodactylus pentadactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica. 32:137–139.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Filho JC, Giaretta A. 2008. Reproductive behavior of Leptodactylus mystacinus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) with notes on courtship call of other Leptodactylus species. Iheringia, Série Zoologia. 98:508–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponssa ML, Barrionuevo S. 2008. Foam-nesting behaviour in tadpoles of Leptodactylus latinasus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae): significance in systematics. Zootaxa. 1884:51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB. 2002. Description of a new reproductive mode in Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with a review of the reproductive specialization toward terrestriality in the genus. Copeia. 2002:1128–1133.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JELS, Hopkins MG, Vicentini A, Sothers CA, Costa MAS, Brito JM, Souza MAD, Martins LHP, Lohmann LG, Assunção PACL, et al. 1999. Flora da Reserva Ducke: guia de identificação das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra rirme na Amazônia Central. Manaus: INPA.
   Google Scholar
• Rivero JA, Esteves AE. 1969. Observations on the agonistic and breeding behaviour of Leptodactylus pentadactylus and other amphibian species in Venezuela. Breviora Museum of Comparative Zoology. 321:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues DJ, Lima AP, Magnusson WE, Costa FRC. 2010. Temporary pond availability and tadpole species composition in Central Amazonia. Herpetologica. 66:124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues DJ, Menin M, Lima AP. 2007. Redescription of the tadpole of Leptodactylus rhodomystax (Anura: Leptodactylidae) with natural history notes. Zootaxa. 1509:61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rossa-Feres DC, Nomura F. 2006. Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 6(1):223–248.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze A, Jansen M. 2012. One species, two strategies? Oviposition site variation in a member of the Leptodactylus pentadactylus group (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 47:183–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva WR, Giaretta AA. 2009. On the natural history of Leptodactylus syphax with comments on the evolution of reproductive features in the L. pentadactylus species group (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Journal of Natural History. 43:191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva WR, Giaretta AA, Facure KG. 2005. On the natural history of the South American pepper frog, Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Journal of Natural History. 39:555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira WLS, Santana GG, Vieira KS. 2007. Description of the tadpole of Leptodactylus vastus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Zootaxa. 1529:61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Vizotto LD. 1967. Desenvolvimento de anuros da região norte-ocidental do Estado de São Paulo. São José do Rio Preto: Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Vonesh JR. 2000. Dipteran predation on the arboreal eggs of four Hyperolius frog species in Western Uganda. Copeia. 2000:560–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4a ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar