Urbanization impacts on the trophic guild composition of bird communities

References

• Arzamendia V, Giraudo A. 2004. Usando patrones de biodiversidad para la evaluación y diseño de áreas protegidas : las serpientes de la provincia de Santa Fe (Argentina) como ejemplo. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 77:335–348.
   Google Scholar
• Arzamendia V, Giraudo AR. 2012. A panbiogeographical model to prioritize areas for conservation along large rivers. Divers Distrib. 18:168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banville MJ, Bateman HL, Earl SR, Warren PS. 2017. Decadal declines in bird abundance and diversity in urban riparian zones. Landsc Urban Plan. 159:48–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair R. 2004. The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecol and Society. 9(5):2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2
   Google Scholar
• Blair RB. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Appl. 6(2):506–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonier F, Martin PR, Wingfield JC. 2007. Urban birds have broader environmental tolerance. Biol Lett. 3(August):670–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcard D, Legendre P. 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Modell. 153:51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcard D, Legendre P, Avois-Jacquet C, Tuomisto H. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales statistical reports. Ecology. 85(7):1826–1832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology. 73(3):1045–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CabreraÁL. 1994. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. In: En Kugler WF, editor. Enciclopedia argentina de agricultura y jardinería. Tomo 2. 2da. edición. 1ra. reimpresión,  Fascículo 1. Acme: Buenos Aires, Argentina; p. 1–85.
   Google Scholar
• Cao W, Li R, Chi X, Chen N, Chen J, Zhang H, Zhang F. 2017. Island urbanization and its ecological consequences: A case study in the Zhoushan Island, East China. Ecol Indic. 76:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbó-Ramírez P, Zuria I. 2011. The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landsc Urban Plan. 100(3):213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpintero DL, Aramburú RM. 2007. Presencia de Caminicimex furnarii (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) en nidos de golondrina (Passeriformes: Hirundinidae) en Argentina. Rev la Soc Entomol Argentina. 66:153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Casenave LD, Filipello AM. 1995. Las aves acuáticas de la Reserva Costanera Sur: cambios estacionales en la composición específica y en la abundancia de poblaciones y gremios. El Hornero. 14:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chace JF, Walsh JJ. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan. 74(1):46–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L, Dinetti M. 2006. Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv. 127(3):336–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clergeau P, Jokimäki J, Savard J-PL. 2001. Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes? J Appl Ecol. 38(5):1122–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concepción ED, Götzenberger L, Nobis MP, de Bello F, Obrist MK, Moretti M. 2017. Contrasting trait assembly patterns in plant and bird communities along environmental and human-induced land-use gradients. Ecography (Cop). 40:753–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole LE, Kirkpatrick JB. 2011. Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landsc Urban Plan. 100(1–2):11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croci S, Butet A, Clergeau P. 2008. Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? Condor. 110(2):223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinerstein E, Olson DM, Graham DJ, Webster AL, Primm SA, Bookbinder MP, Ledec G, World Wildlife Fund. 1995.A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington (DC): The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Hawkins BA. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geograhical ecology. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 12:53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR. 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Modell. 196(3):483–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fandiño B, Giraudo AR. 2010. Revisión del inventario de aves de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina. Revista FABICIB. 14:116–137.
   Google Scholar
• Fattorini S. 2011. Insect extinction by urbanization: A long term study in Rome. Biol Conserv. 144(1):370–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filloy J, Bellocq MI. 2006. Spatial variations in the abundance of Sporophila seedeaters in the southern Neotropics: contrasting the effects of agricultural development and geographical position. Biodivers Conserv. 15:3329–3340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana S, Sattler T, Bontadina F, Moretti M. 2011. How to manage the urban green to improve bird diversity and community structure. Landsc Urban Plan. 101(3):278–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudo A. 2009. Deforestación, defaunación como consecuencia de las actividades humanas en la llanura del Chaco Argentino. In: Morello JH, Rodriguez AF, editors. El Chaco sin bosques: La Pampa o el desierto del futuro. Buenos Aires: Orientació; p. 315–345. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Giraudo AR, Krauczuk E, Arzamendia V, Povedano H. 2003. Critical analysis of protected areas in the Atlantic forest of Argentina. En: Galindo-Leal C, Câmara IG, editors. State of the hotspots: atlantic forest. Center for Applied Biodiversity Science. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giraudo AR, Matteucci SD, Alonso J, Herrera J, Abramson RR. 2008. Comparing bird assemblages in large and small fragments of the Atlantic Forest hotspots. Biodivers Conserv. 17(5):1251–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Oreja JA, De La Fuente-Díaz-Ordaz AA, Hernández-Santín L, Bonache-Regidor C, Buzo-Franco D. 2012. Can human disturbance promote nestedness? Songbirds and noise in urban parks as a case study. Landsc Urban Plan. 104(1):9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith DA, Peres-Neto PR. 2006. Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. Ecology. 87(10):2603–2613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science (New York, N.Y.). 319(5864):756–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Montes MI, Aide TM. 2011. Impacts of traffic noise on anuran and bird communities. Urban Ecosyst. 14(3):415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikin K, Knight E, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD. 2012. Linking bird species traits to vegetation characteristics in a future urban development zone: implications for urban planning. Urban Ecosyst. 15:961–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INDEC Dirección Nacional de Estadísticas Sociales y de Población. 2010. Dirección de Estadísticas Sectoriales en base al Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010. World Wide Web. [accessed 2016 May 25]. www.indec.mecon.gov.ar.
   Google Scholar
• Juri MD, Chani JM. 2005. Variación en la composición de comunidades de aves a lo largo de un gradiente urbano (Tucumán, Argentina). Acta Zoológica Lilloana. 49:49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A, Banker E. 2007. Living in the city: can anyone become an ?urban exploiter’? J Biogeogr. 34(4):638–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy C, Cuddihy J, Engel-Yan J. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. J Ind Ecol. 11(2):43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MB, Rotenberry JT. 2015. Effects of land use on riparian birds in a semiarid region. J Arid Environ. 119:61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or New Paradigm. Ecology. 74(6):1659–1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre L. 1988. Numerical ecology, volume 24 (Developments in Environmental Modelling) (Vol. 24). doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Lennon JJ. 2000. Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography. 23:101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepš J, Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leveau C, Leveau L. 2006. Ensambles de aves en calles arboladas de tres ciudades costeras del sudeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hornero. 21(1):25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Leveau L, Leveau C. 2004. Comunidades de aves en un gradiente urbano de la ciudad de Mar del Plata, Argentina. Hornero. 19(1):13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Leveau LM. 2013. Bird traits in urban–rural gradients: how many functional groups are there? J Ornithol. 154(3):655–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveau LM, Leveau CM, Villegas M, Cursach JA, Suazo CG. 2017. Bird communities along urbanization gradients: a comparative analysis among three neotropical cities. Ornitol Neotrop. 28:77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim HC, Sodhi NS. 2004. Responses of avian guilds to urbanisation in a tropical city. Landsc Urban Plan. 66:199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T, Coppack T, Lin Q, Kulemeyer C, Schmidt A, Behm H, Luo T. 2012. Does avian flight initiation distance indicate tolerance towards urban disturbance? Ecol Indic. 15(1):30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long X, Ji X, Ulgiati S. 2016. Is urbanization eco-friendly? An energy and land use cross-country analysis. Energy Policy. 2006:387–396.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor-Fors I, Morales-Pérez L, Schondube JE. 2010. Migrating to the city: responses of neotropical migrant bird communities to urbanization. Condor. 112(4):711–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor-Fors I, Schondube JE. 2011. Gray vs. green urbanization: relative importance of urban features for urban bird communities. Basic Appl Ecol. 12(4):372–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markarenkov V, Legendre P. 2002. Nonlinear redundancy analysis and canonical correspondence analysis based on polynomial regression. Ecol. 83(4):1146–1161.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuba M, Nishijima S, Katoh K. 2016. Effectiveness of corridor vegetation depends on urbanization tolerance of forest birds in central Tokyo, Japan. Urban Forest Urban Green. 18:173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonnell AMJ, Pickett STA. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology published by: Ecological Society of America Stable. 71(4):1232–1237. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1938259.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv. 127(3):247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11:161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Meffert PJ, Dziock F. 2012. What determines occurrence of threatened bird species on urban wastelands? Biol Conserv. 153:87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert PJ, Dziock F. 2013. The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landsc Ecol. 28(5):943–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K. 2003. Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species – environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol. 7(1):5.
   Google Scholar
• Menon M, Mohanraj R. 2016. Temporal and spatial assemblages of invasive birds occupying the urban landscape and its gradient in a southern city of India. J Asia-Pacific Biodivers. 9(1):74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Myczko L, Rosin ZM, Skórka P, Tryjanowski P. 2014. Urbanization level and woodland size are major drivers of woodpecker species richness and abundance. PloS One. 9(4):e94218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspot for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, et al. 2016. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-1. [accessed 2016 July 25]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I. 2009. Living in the big city: effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landsc Urban Plan. 90(3–4):189–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paker Y, Yom-Tov Y, Alon-Mozes T, Barnea A. 2014. The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure. Landsc Urban Plan. 122:186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauchard A, Aguayo M, Peña E, Urrutia R. 2006. Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biol Conserv. 127(3):272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauw A, Louw K. 2012. Urbanization drives a reduction in functional diversity in a guild of nectar-feeding birds. 17(2):27. doi:10.5751/ES-04758-170227
   Google Scholar
• Perepelizin PV, Faggi AM. 2009. Diversidad de aves en tres barrios de la ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Multequina. 18:71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 87(10):2614–2625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaud P, Thioulouse J. 2000. Identification of birds as biological markers along a neotropical urban–rural gradient (Cayenne, French Guiana), using co-inertia analysis. J Environ Manage. 59:121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM. 2009. Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 142:1141–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti MA, Giraudo AR. 2003. Comunidades de aves de bosques fluviales habitados y no habitados por el hombre en el río Paraná Medio, Argentina. Hornero. 18(2):89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sattler T, Borcard D, Arlettaz R, Bontadina F, Legendre P, Obrist MK, Moretti M. 2010. Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology. 91(11):3343–3353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sequeira G, Vanasco G, Enria D, Calderon G, Canal A. 2003. Distribución de Pequeños Mamíferos en la Ciudad de Santa Fe, Argentina. Revista FAVE-Ciencias Veterinarias. 2(1):7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Shimazaki A, Yamaura Y, Senzaki M, Yabuhara Y, Akasaka T, Nakamura F. 2016. Urban permeability for birds: an approach combining mobbing-call experiments and circuit theory. Urban Forest Urban Green. 19:167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva CP, Sepúlveda RD, Barbosa O. 2016. Nonrandom filtering effect on birds: species and guilds response to urbanization. Ecol Evol. 6(11):3711–3720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TW, Lundholm JT. 2010. Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography. 33(November 2009):648–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soijet M, Rodríguez M, Tonini R, Mantovani G, Gramaglia V, Celeste M, … Uriarte Y. 2012. Observatorio Del Área Metropolitana Santa Fe-Paraná (Amsf-P). Cuaderno Urbano Espacio Cultura Sociedad. 13(13):149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Suri J, Anderson PM, Charles-Dominique T, Hellard E, Cumming GS. 2017. More than just a corridor: a suburban river catchment enhances bird functional diversity. Landsc Urban Plan. 157:331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJ, Smilauer P 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, New York: Microcomputer Power. www.canoco.com
   Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJF. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology. 67(5):1167–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threlfall CG, Williams NSG, Hahs AK, Livesley SJ. 2016. Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages. Landsc Urban Plan. 153:28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwary NK, Urfi AJ. 2016. Spatial variations of bird occupancy in Delhi: the significance of woodland habitat patches in urban centres. Urban Forest Urban Green. 20:338–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2008. World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. In United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division [CD-ROM]. CD-ROM: Data in digital form (POP/DB/WUP/Rev.2007).
   Google Scholar
• van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Mathieu R. 2008. Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landsc Urban Plan. 87(3):223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rensburg BJ, Peacock DS, Robertson MP. 2009. Biotic homogenization and alien bird species along an urban gradient in South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan. 92(3–4):233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavrek MJ 2011. Fossil: palaeoecological and palaeogeographical analysis tools. Palaeontologia Electronica. [accessed 2016 July 25]:[14:1T]. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2011_1/238/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vignoli L, Scirè S, Bologna MA. 2013. Rural–urban gradient and land use in a millenary metropolis: how urbanization affects avian functional groups and the role of old villas in bird assemblage patterning. Web Ecol. 13(1):49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Yang G, Xu J, Wang Y, Wang X, Pei E, Yuan X, Wang Z. 2015. Evaluation of microhabitats for wild birds in a Shanghai urban area park. Urban Forest Urban Green. 14(2):246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol. 1:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar