Heterospecific mating between distantly related species of stink bugs and its evolutionary implications

References

• Adams TS. 2001. Morphology of the internal reproductive system of the male and female two-spotted stink bug, Perillus bioculatus (F.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and the transfer of products during mating. Invertebr Reprod Dev. 39:45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich JR, Hoffmann MP, Kochansky JP, Lusby WR, Eger JE, Payne JA. 1991. Identification and attractiveness of a major pheromone component for Nearctic Euschistus spp. stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Environ Entomol. 20:477–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagwell GJ, Čokl A, Millar JG. 2008. Characterization and comparison of substrate-borne vibrational signals of Chlorochroa uhleri, Chlorochroa ligata, and Chlorochroa sayi (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 101:235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick GH, Bick JC. 1981. Heterospecific pairing among Odonata. Odonatologica. 10:259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Blassioli-Moraes MC, Laumann RA, Oliveira MWM, Woodcock CM, Mayon P, Hooper A, Pickett JA, Birkett MA, Borges M. 2012. Sex pheromone communication in two sympatric Neotropical stink bug species Chinavia ubica and Chinavia impicticornis. J Chem Ecol. 38:836–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges M, Jepson PC, Howse PE. 1987. Long‐range mate location and close‐range courtship behaviour of the Green Stink Bug, Nezara viridula and its mediation by sex pheromones. Entomol Exp Appl. 44:205–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capone TA. 1995. Mutual preference for large mates in green stink bugs, Acrosternum hilare (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Anim Behav. 49:1335–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocroft RB, Rodríguez RL. 2005. The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. Bioscience. 55:323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čokl A. 2008. Stink bug interaction with host plants during communication. J Insect Physiol. 54:1113–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čokl A, Laumann RA, Až K, Blassioli-Moraes MC, Virant-Doberlet M, Borges M. 2015. Interference of overlapping insect vibratory communication signals: an Eushistus heros model. PloS One. 10(6):e0130775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa J, Peterson AT, Dujardin JP. 2009. Morphological evidence suggests homoploid hybridization as a possible mode of speciation in the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae). Infect Genet Evol. 9:263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution. 43:362–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot M, Čokl A, Virant-Doberlet M. 2011. Species identity cues: possibilities for errors during vibrational communication on plant stems. Behav Ecol. 22:1209–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn DJ, Vermette R, Kapoor NN, Zahiri N. 2003. Functional morphology of sexually selected genitalia in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Can J Zool. 81:400–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari A, Schwertner CF, Grazia J. 2010. Review, cladistic analysis and biogeography of Nezara Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Zootaxa. 2424:1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Foot K, Strobell EC. 1914. Results of Crossing Euschistus variolarius and Euschistus servus with reference to the Inheritance of an Exclusively Male Character. Zool J Linn Soc. 32:337–373.
   Google Scholar
• Foot K, Strobell EC. 1917. Results of Crossing Euschistus variolarius and Euschistus ictericus with Reference to the Inheritance of Two Exclusively Male Characters. Biol Bull. 32:322–342.
   Google Scholar
• Fürstenau BBRJ, Schwertner CF, Grazia J. 2013. Comparative morphology of immature stages of four species of Chinavia (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae), with a key to the species of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. ZooKeys. 319:59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genevcius BC, Caetano DS, Schwertner CF. 2017. Rapid differentiation and asynchronous coevolution of male and female genitalia in stink bugs. J Evol Biol. 3:461–473.
   Google Scholar
• Genevcius BC, Schwertner CF. 2014. Review and phylogeny of the geniculata group, genus Chinavia (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), with notes on biogeography and morphological evolution. Zootaxa. 3847:33–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gozlan RE, Burnard D, Andreou D. 2014. Evidence of female preference for hidden sex signals in distant fish species. Behav Ecol. 25:53–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrabar N, Virant-Doberlet M, Čokl A. 2004. Species specificity of male southern green stink bug Nezara viridula (L.) reactions to the female calling song. Acta Zool Sin. 50:566–575.
   Google Scholar
• Ito K. 1984. Interspecific hybridization between Cletus punctiger and C. rusticus (Heteroptera: Coreidae). Appl Entomol Zool. 19:142–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izzo AS, Gray DA. 2011. Heterospecific courtship and sequential mate choice in sister species of field crickets. Anim Behav. 81:259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner R, Vollmeister E, Feldbrügge M, Begerow D. 2011. Interspecific sex in grass smuts and the genetic diversity of their pheromone-receptor system. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiritani K, Hokyo N, Yukawa J. 1963. Co-existence of the two related stink bugs Nezara viridula and N. antennata under natural conditions. Res Popul Ecol. 5:11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kon M, Oe A, Numata H. 1993. Intra-and interspecific copulations in the two congeneric green stink bugs, Nezara antennata and N. viridula (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae), with reference to postcopulatory changes in the spermatheca. J Ethol. 11:83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kon M, Oe A, Numata H. 1994. Ethological isolation between two congeneric green stink bugs, Nezara antennata and N. viridula (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). J Ethol. 12:67–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kon M, Oe A, Numata H, Hidaka T. 1988. Comparison of the mating behaviour between two sympatric species, Nezara antennata and N. viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), with special reference to sound emission. J Ethol. 6:91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupke CH, Brunner JF, Jones VP. 2008. Factors influencing mate choice in Euschistus conspersus Uhler (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Environ Entomol. 37:192–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann RA, Čokl A, Blassioli-Moraes MC, Borges M. 2016. Vibratory Communication and its relevance to reproductive isolation in two sympatric stink bug species (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae). J Insect Behav. 29:643–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmen J, Evenden M. 2015. Environmental conditions terminate reproductive diapause and influence pheromone perception in the long‐lived moth Caloptilia fraxinella. Physiol Entomol. 40:30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet J. 2005. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masly JP. 2012. 170 years of “lock-and-key”: genital morphology and reproductive isolation. Int J Evol Biol. 2012:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Matesco VC, Schwertner CF, Grazia J. 2006. Description of the immature stages of Chinavia erythrocnemis (Berg)(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Neotrop Entomol. 35:483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes MC, Pareja M, Laumann RA, Borges M. 2008. The chemical volatiles (Semiochemicals) produced by neotropical stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Neotrop Entomol. 37:489–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes MCB, Laumann RA, Cokl A, Borges M. 2005. Vibratory signals of four Neotropical stink bug species. Physiol Entomol. 30:175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-García M, Cordero C. 2008. On the function of male genital claspers in Stenomacra marginella (Heteroptera: Largidae). J Ethol. 26:255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ord TJ, King L, Young AR. 2011. Contrasting theory with the empirical data of species recognition. Evolution. 65:2572–2591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira AIA, Silva RB, Tavares WS, Malaquias JB, Zanuncio JC. 2017. Lightweight males of Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) neglect lightweight females due low reproductive fitness. Braz J Biol. 77:267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfennig KS. 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc Royal Soci Lond B Biol Sci. 265:1743–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolston LH. 1983. A revision of the genus Acrosternum Fieber, subgenus Chinavia Orian, in the Western Hemisphere (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J NY Entomol Soc. 91:97–176.
   Google Scholar
• Schwertner CF, Grazia J. 2007. O gênero Chinavia Orian (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae, Pentatominae) no Brasil, com chave pictórica para os adultos [The genus Chinavia Orian (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae, Pentatominae) in Brazil, with pictorical-key for adults]. Rev Bras Entomol. 51:416–435.
   Google Scholar
• Silva CCA, Laumann RA, Ferreira JBC, Moraes MCB, Borges M, Čokl A. 2012. Reproductive biology, mating behavior, and vibratory communication of the brown-winged stink bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Psyche. 598086:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Spence JR. 1990. Introgressive hybridization in Heteroptera: the example of Limnoporus Stål (Gerridae) species in western Canada. Can J Zool. 68:1770–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacconi MVR, Romani R. 2011. Ultrastructure and functional aspects of the spermatheca in the American Harlequin Bug Murgatia histronica (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Neotrop Entomol. 40:222–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takakura KI, Nishida T, Iwao K. 2015. Conflicting intersexual mate choices maintain interspecific sexual interactions. Popul Ecol. 57:261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaru M, Matsubayashi H, Oguma Y. 1998. Effects of courtship song in interspecific crosses among the species of the Drosophila auraria complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Insect Behav. 11:383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen T, Faulks J, Tyler F, Lloyd J, Tregenza T. 2013. Diverse reproductive barriers in hybridising crickets suggests extensive variation in the evolution and maintenance of isolation. Evol Ecol. 27:993–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AR, Tompkins L. 1997. Sexual interactions between two distantly related Drosophila species, D. melanogaster and D. willistoni (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Insect Behav. 10:771–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Záveská E, Fér T, Šída O, Marhold K, Leong-Škorničková J. 2016. Hybridization among distantly related species: examples from the polyploid genus Curcuma (Zingiberaceae). Mol Phylogenetics Evol. 100:303–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar