Tegmina-size variation in a Neotropical cricket with implications on spectral song properties

References

• Alexander RD. 1962. Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution. 16:443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allegrucci G, Cesaroni D, Sbordoni V. 1987. Adaptation and speciation of Dolichopoda cave crickets (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae): geographic variation of morphometric indices and allozyme frequencies. Biol J Linn Soc. 31:151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytekin AM, Terzo M, Rasmont P, Cagatay N. 2007. Landmark based geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape in Sibiricobombus Vogt (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus Latreille). J Entomol. 43:95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey WJ, Yeoh PB. 1988. Female phonotaxis and frequency discrimination in the bushcricket Requena verticalis. Physiol Entomol. 13(4):363‒372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet-Clark HC. 1999. Resonators in insect sound production: how insects produce loud pure-tone songs. J Exp Biol. 202:3347–3357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet-Clark HC. 2003. Wing resonances in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. J Exp Biol. 206:1479–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennet-Clark HC, Bailey WJ. 2002. Ticking of the clockwork cricket: the role of the escapement mechanism. J Exp Biol. 205:613–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidau CJ, Miño CI, Castillo ER, Martí DA. 2012. Effects of abiotic factors on the geographic distribution of body size variation and chromosomal polymorphisms in two Neotropical grasshopper species (Dichroplus: Melanoplinae: Acrididae). Psyche. 2012:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein FL. 1986. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions: comment. Stat Sci. 1:238‒242.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein FL. 1990. Introduction to methods for landmark data. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Michigan: Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan; p. 215‒225.
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown WD. 1999. Mate choice in tree crickets and their kin. Ann Rev Entomol. 44:371–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David JAO, Zefa E, Fontanetti C. 2003. Cryptic species of Gryllus in the light of bioacoustic (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Neotrop Entomol. 32:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Desutter-Grandcolas L. 1998. Pulse duration and the effectiveness of acoustic communication in crickets (Orthoptera: Grylloidea): the case of Paragryllodes campanella, sp. n. (Phalangopsidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr. 34:407–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz-Filho J, Hepburn HR, Radloff S, Fuchs S. 2000. Spatial analysis of morphological variation in African honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) on a continental scale. Apidologie. 31:191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott CJH, Koch UT. 1985. The clockwork cricket. Naturwissenschaften. 72:1–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorochov AV. 2007. Taxonomic study of Mexican Phalangopsinae (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Zoosyst Rossica. 16:177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Gorochov AV. 2014. Classification of the Phalangopsinae subfamily group, and new taxa from the subfamilies Phalangopsinae and Phaloriinae (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Zoosyst Rossica. 23:7–88.
   Google Scholar
• Grodnitsky DL. 1999. Form and function of insect wings. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacot A, Scheuber H, Brinkhof MWG. 2004. Costs of an induced immune response on sexual display and longevity in field crickets. Evolution. 58(10):2280–2286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk WJ, Da Silva CJ, Nunes-da-Cunha CN, Wantzen KM. 2011. The Pantanal: Ecology, biodiversity and sustainable management of a large Neotropical seasonal wetland. Sofia (Bulgaria): Pensoft.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall DG. 1981. The statistics of shape. In: Barnett V, editor. Interpreting multivariate data. New York: Wiley & Sons; p. 75‒80.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Res. 11:353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and symmetry. Evolution. 56:1909–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP, Debat V, Roff DA. 2010. Quantitative genetics of shape in cricket wings: developmental integration in a functional structure. Evolution. 64:2935–2951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg CP, Monteiro LR. 2005. Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: implications for morphometric application. Syst Biol. 54:678–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch UT, Elliott CJH, Schäffner KH, Kleindienst HU. 1988. The mechanics of stridulation of the cricket Gryllus campestris. J Comp Physiol A. 162:213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer W, Sippel M. 1987. Acoustic cues for female choice and male competition in Tettigonia cantans. Anim Behav. 35:887‒900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima CBS, Nunes LA, Ribeiro MF, Carvalho CAL. 2014. Population structure of Melipona subnitda Ducke (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) at the southern limit of its distribution based on geometric morphometrics of forewings. Sociobiol. 61:478–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima RM, Martins LDP, Pereira MR, Ganchev TD, Jahn O, Lhano MG, Marques MI, Schuchmann KL. 2016. Lerneca inalata beripocone subsp. nov. (Orthoptera: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae): a new taxon for the northern Pantanal of Brazil. Zootaxa. 4175:366–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxdale HD. 2010. Rapid genetic changes in natural insect populations. Ecol Entomol. 35(Suppl.):155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason AC. 1996. Territoriality and the function of song in the primitive acoustic insect Cyphoderris monstrosa (Orthoptera: Haglidae). Anim Behav. 51:211‒214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montealegre ZF. 2009. Scale effects and constraints for sound production in katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): correlated evolution between morphology and signal parameters. J Evol Biol. 22(2):355‒366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montealegre ZF, Windmill JFC, Morris GK, Robert D. 2009. Mechanical phase shifters for coherent acoustic radiation in the stridulating wings of crickets: the plectrum mechanism. J Exp Biol. 212:257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris GK. 2008. Size and carrier in the bog katydid, Metrioptera sphagnorum (Orthoptera: Ensifera, Tettigoniidae). J Orthoptera Res. 17(2):333–342.
   Google Scholar
• Nocke H. 1971. Biophysik der Schallerzeugung durch die Vorderflügel der Grillen. Z Vergl Physiol. 74:272–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes LA, Araújo ED, Carvalho CAL, Waldschmidt AM. 2008. Population divergence of Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera: Apidae) endemic to the semi-arid region of the State of Bahia, Brazil. Sociobiol. 52:81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes LA, Araújo ED, Marchini LC, Moreti ACCC. 2012. Variation morphogeometrics of Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera) in Brazil. Iheringia. 102:321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini MP, Da-Costa MKM, Szinwelski N, Martins LDP, Correa RC, Timm VF, Zefa E. 2017. New species of Miogryllus Saussure, 1877 and new record of Miogryllus piracicabensis Piza, 1960 (Orthoptera: gryllidae) from State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, with calling song and chromosome complement. Zootaxa. 4290(3):547‒558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchers WR, Klingenberg CP, Tregenza T, Hunt J, Dworkin I. 2014. The potential influence of morphology on the evolutionary divergence of an acoustic signal. J Evol Biol. 27(10):2163‒2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestwich KN, Lenihan KM, Martin DM. 2000. The control of carrier frequency in cricket calls: a refutation of the subalar-tegminal resonance/auditory feedback model. J Exp Biol. 203:585–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragge DR. 1955. The wing-venation of the Orthoptera Saltatoria with notes on dictyopteran wing-venation. London: British Museum of Natural History; p. 159.
   Google Scholar
• Ragge DR. 1965. Grasshoppers, crickets and cockroaches. London (UK): Frederick Warne and Co LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf FJ. 2006. TPSDIG2 for Windows version 1.46. Stony Brook (NY): Stony Brook Morphometrics.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuber H, Jacot A, Brinkhof MW. 2003. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim Behav. 65(4):721–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons LW. 1995. Correlates of male quality in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L.: age, size, and symmetry determine pairing success in field populations. Behav Ecol. 6:376–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons LW, Ritchie MG. 1996. Symmetry in the songs of crickets. Proc R Soc. 263:1305–1311.
   Google Scholar
• Song H. 2009. Species-specificity of male genitalia is characterized by shape, size, and complexity. Insect Syst Evol. 40:159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe RS. 2008. Biometric analysis of geographic variation and racial affinities. Biol Rev. 51:407–452.
   Google Scholar
• Verburgt L, Ferguson JWH. 2010. Mate choice in field crickets: can females acoustically detect male body size? J Ethol. 28(1):141‒151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker TJ. 1962. Factors responsible for intraspecific variation in the calling songs of cricket. Evolution. 16:407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb KL, Roff DA. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim Behav. 44:823–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zefa E. 2006. Comparison of calling songs in three allopatric populations of Endecous itatibensis (Orthoptera, Phalangopsinae). Iheringia. 96:13–16.
   Google Scholar