595
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Empirical investigation of workloads of operators in advanced control rooms

, &
Pages 744-751 | Received 12 Nov 2013, Accepted 13 Feb 2014, Published online: 17 Mar 2014

References

  • Silva LCJ, Borges MRS, Carvalho PVR. Human factors evaluation in nuclear power plant control rooms using a mobile system to support collaborative observation. Prog Nucl Energy. 2012;55:93–101.
  • Lin CJ, Yenn T, Jou Y, Hsieh T, Yang C. Analyzing the staffing and workload in the main control room of the advanced nuclear power plant from the human information processing perspective. Safety Sci. 2013;57:161–168.
  • Kim YG, Seong PH. State token petri net modeling method for formal verification of computerized procedure including operator's interruptions of procedure execution flow. Nucl Eng Technol. 2012;44(8):929–938.
  • O’Hara J, Higgins J, Kramer J. Advanced information systems design: technical basis and human factors review guidance (NUREG/Cr-6633). Washington (DC): US NRC; 2000.
  • Kim Y, Kim J, Jang S, Jung W. Empirical investigation of communication characteristics under a computer-based procedure in an advanced control room. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2012;49(10):988–998.
  • Kim S, Kim Y, Jung W. Proposal on framework for measurement of workload of operators in environment of advanced main control room. ANS 2013 Winter Meeting and Nuclear Technology Expo; 2013 Nov 10–14; Washington, DC.
  • Embrey D, Blackett C, Marsden P, Peachey J. Development of a human cognitive workload assessment tool. Dalton (UK): Human Reliability Associates; 2006.
  • Cain B. A review of the mental workload literature. Technical Report, RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II. Toronto (Canada); 2007.
  • Hollnagel E. A cognitive task analysis of the SGTR scenario. Technical report, NKSRAK- 1(96)R3. Risø (Denmark); 1996.
  • Kim S, Park J, Han S, Kim H. Development of extended speech act coding scheme to observe communication characteristics of human operators of nuclear power plants under abnormal conditions. J Loss Prevent Proc. 2010;23:539–548.
  • CE Owners’ Group. Combustion engineering emergency response guidance. CEN-152, Rev. 5.2.; 2001.
  • Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955;11:1–42.
  • Wickens CD. Engineering psychology and human performance. New York (NY): HarperCollins; 1992.
  • Kim Y, Jung W. Quantifying the step following level of an operator in proceduralized scenarios. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting Proceedings; 2012 Oct 25–26; Gyeongju, Korea.
  • Choi SY, Park J. Operator behaviors observed in following emergency operating procedure under a simulated emergency. Nucl Eng Technol. 2012;44(4):379–386.
  • Lin CJ, Yenn T, Yang C. Automation design in advanced control rooms of the modernized nuclear power plants. Safety Sci. 2010;48:63–71.
  • Bhushan N, Rai K. Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. London: Springer-Verlag; 2004.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.