Techniques to derive additional information of operation actions for computer-based operating procedure

References

• O'Hara J, Higgins J, Kramer J. Advanced information systems design: technical basis and human factors review guidance. Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2000. ( NUREG/CR-6633:2000).
   Google Scholar
• Askwall S. Computer supported reading vs reading text on paper: a comparison of two reading situations. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1985;22(4):425–439.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes JM, Garland KJ. Computer vs paper-based tasks: are they equivalent? Ergonomics. 2008;51(9):1352–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YL, Hwang SL, Wang MY. Reducing cognitive workload of a computer-based procedure system. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2005;63(6):587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara J, Higgins J, Stibler W, et al. Computer-based procedure systems: technical basis and human factors review guidance. Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2000. ( NUREG/CR-6634:2000).
   Google Scholar
• Marsden P, Green M. Optimising procedures in manufacturing systems. Int J Ind Ergonom. 1996;17(1):43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin W, Hibit R, Allen J, et al. Development and evaluation of the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process. Int J Ind Ergonom. 2000;26(2):261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Blanc K, Oxstrand J, Waicosky T. Requirements for computer based-procedures for nuclear power plant field operators: results from a qualitative study. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 2012. ( Report; no. IAEA-CN-194).
   Google Scholar
• Lind M. Means and ends of control. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference of System Man and Cybernetics; 2004 Oct 10–13; The Hague, Holland, IEEE, 2004. p. 833–840.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii H, Gofuku A, Ago T. Operation support in anomalous plant conditions using PKY knowledge. In: Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference; 2008 Aug 20–22; Tokyo, Japan, IEEE, 2008. p. 293–296.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006. Epilogue, Resilience engineering precepts; p. 347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Suryono TJ, Gofuku A. The desirable features of computer based emergency operating procedure for nuclear power operation. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49(19):403–407.
   Google Scholar
• Lind M. Modeling goals and functions of complex plant. Appl Artif Intell Int J. 1994;8(2):259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind M. Control functions in MFM: basic principles. Nucl Saf Simul. 2011;2(2):132–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lind M. An introduction to multilevel flow modeling. Nucl Saf Simul. 2011;2(1):22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yoshikawa H, Wu W, et al. Modeling goals and functions of micro gas turbine system by multilevel flow models. Inf Media Tech. 2006;1:963–972.
   Google Scholar
• Gofuku A, Koide S, Shimada N. Fault tree analysis and failure mode effects analysis based on multi-level flow modeling and causality estimation. In: Proceeding of SICE–ICASE International Joint Conference; 2006 Oct 18–21; Busan, Korea, IEEE, 2006. p. 497–500.
   Google Scholar
• Lind M, Yoshikawa H, Jørgensen SB, et al. Multilevel flow modeling of Monju nuclear power plant. Nucl Saf Simul. 2011;2(3):274–284.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson JE. Knowledge-based methods for control systems [dissertation]. Lund: Lund Institute of Technology; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gofuku A. Multi-level flow modeling and its applications. Nucl Saf Simul. 2015;5(4):305–309.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson J. Diagnostic reasoning based on means–end models: experiences and future prospects. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2002;15(1–2):103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen J. Causal reasoning based on MFM. In: Proceedings of Conference on Cognitive System Engineering in Process Control (CSEPC); 2000 Nov 22-25; Taejon, Korea. p. 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gofuku A, Sato T. Development of a dynamic operation permission agent for preventing commission errors of operators. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control; 2007 Sept 5–7; Kumamoto, Japan: IEEE, 2007,p.108
   Google Scholar
• Gofuku A, Sato T. Dynamic operation permission system for oil refinery plants. In: International Conference of Networking, Sensing and Control; 2009 Mar 26–29; Okayama, Japan, IEEE, 2009. p. 746–751.
   Google Scholar
• Lind M, Zhang X. Functional modelling for fault diagnosis and its applications for NPP. Nucl Eng Technol. 2014;46(6):753–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofuku A, Tanaka Y. Display of diagnostic information from multiple viewpoints in anomalous situation of complex plants. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (IEEE SMC '99); 1999 Oct 12 -15; Tokyo, Japan. IEEE, 1999; p. 642–647.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Lind M, Ravn O. Consequence reasoning in multilevel flow modelling. IFAC Proc Vol. 2013;46(15):187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim K, Eun Y. Analyses of SGTR accident with Mihama unit experience. J Korean Nucl Soc. 1994;26(1):41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo S. Lessons learned for PSA from the SGTR incident at Mihama, unit 2, in 1991. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1994;45(1–2):57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofuku A, Inoue T, Sugihara T. A technique to generate plausible counter-operation for an emergency situation based on a model expressing functions of components. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2017;54:578–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton L, Smedley C, Handy J, et al. Realistic methods for calculating the release of radioactivity following steam generator tube rupture faults: a consensus document. Luxembourg: European Comission; 1994. ( Final Report; EUR 15615 EN).
   Google Scholar