Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulation part 6: introduction of detailed dose calculation method

References

• Nagai H, Chino M, Yamazawa H. Development of scheme for predicting atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides during nuclear emergency by using atmospheric dynamic model. , Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan. 1999;41(7):777–785. in Japanese. .
   Google Scholar
• Terada H, Nagai H, Furuno A, et al. Development of worldwide version of system for prediction of environmental emergency dose information: WSPEEDI 2nd Version. Trans At Energy Soc Jpn. 2008;7(3):257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Sada K, Komiyama S, Michioka T, et al. Numerical model for atmospheric diffusion analysis and evaluation of effective dose for safety analysis. Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan. 2009;8(2):184–196. in Japanese. .
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Nagai H. Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using Large-Eddy simulation part 1: turbulent flow and plume dispersion over a flat terrain. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2009;46(12):1170–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Nagai H. Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulation part 2: turbulent flow and plume dispersion around a cubical building. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2011;48(3):374–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Nagai H. Large-Eddy Simulation on turbulent flow and plume dispersion over a 2-dimensional hill. Advances in Science and Research. 2010;4(1):71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jurcakova K, Nagai H. Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulation. Part 3: turbulent flow and plume dispersion in building arrays. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2013;50(5):503–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Leitl B, Harms F, et al. Development of local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulation. Part 4: turbulent flows and plume dispersion in an actual urban area. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2014;51(5):626–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Nagai H. Local-scale High-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large-eddy simulation: LOHDIM-LES, JAEA-Data/Code, 2015–2026.
   Google Scholar
• Ono H, Takimoto H, Sato A, et al. Development of a numerical model for predicting the atmospheric dispersion of hydrogen-sulfide emitted from geothermal power plants. Trans At Energy Soc Jpn. 2017;52: 19–29. in Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Takemi T, Nagai H. Large-eddy simulation of urban boundary-layer flows by generating turbulent inflows from mesoscale meteorological simulations. Atmospheric Science Letters. 2012;13(3):180–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Takemi T, Nagai H. Development of LO cal-scale High-resolution atmospheric DI spersion Model using Large-Eddy Simulation. Part 5: detailed simulation of turbulent flows and plume dispersion in an actual urban area under real meteorological conditions. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2016;53(6):887–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, et al. Features of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version 3.02. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2018;55(6):684–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh D, Kojima K, Oizumi A, et al. Development of a calculation system for the estimation of decontamination effects. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2014;51(5):656–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh D, Nakayama H, Furuta T, et al. Simulation code for estimating external gamma-ray doses from a radioactive plume and contaminated ground using a local-scale atmospheric dispersion model. Plos One. 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245932.g011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow F, Welch JE. Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface. Physics of Fluids. 1965;8(12):2182–2189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev. 1963;91(3):99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein D, Handler R, Sirovich L. Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field. Journal of Computational Physics. 1993;105(2):354–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan. Meteorological guide for safety analysis of nuclear power plant reactor. Tokyo: Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan; 1982. in Japanese.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh TAM, MacKenzie AR, Whyatt JD, et al. Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012;46(14):7692–7699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeng H, Sullivan P. A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J Atmos Sci. 1994;51(7):999–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto S, Okanishi S, Hiroh A. Comparison and evaluation of plume rise formulas. J Japan Society Air Pollution. 1977;12:456–465.
   Google Scholar
• Brummage KG. The calculation of atmospheric dispersion from a stack, Stichhting CONCAWE. The Hague, The Netherlands: 57; August 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson M, Mylne K, Jones C, et al. Plume dispersion through large groups of obstacles—A field investigation. Atmospheric Environment. 1995;29(22):3245–3256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe K, Iyogi T, Kawabata H, et al. Estimation of 85Kr dispersion from the spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in Rokkasho, Japan, using an atmospheric dispersion model. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;167(1–3):331–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms F, Leitl B, Schatzmann M, et al. Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2011;99(4):289–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JC, Hanna SR. Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phy. 2004;87(1–3):167–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna SR, Hansen OR, Dharmavaram S. FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observations. Atmos Environ. 2004;38(28):4675–4687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna SR, Chang JC. Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys. 2012;116(3–4):133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2003: Control room habitability at light-water nuclear power reactors, Regulatory guide 1.196.
   Google Scholar
• Monin A, Obukhov M. Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the ground layer of the atmosphere. Tr Akad Nauk SSSR Geophiz Inst. 1954;24:163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanjean APR, Monks PS, Leigh RJ. Modelling the effectiveness of urban trees and grass on PM2.5 reduction via dispersion and deposition at a city scale. Atmospheric Environment. 2016;147:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka H, Mizuno M. Numerical flow computation around aeroelastic 3D square cylinder using inflow turbulence. Wind and Structures. 2002;5(2_3_4):379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna SR, Tehranian S, Carissimo B, et al. Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays. Atmospheric Environment. 2002;36(32):5067–5079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolias IC, Koutsourakis N, Hertwig D, et al. Large Eddy Simulation study on the structure of turbulent flow in a complex city. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2018;177:101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineering Science Data Unit, 1985: Characteristics of atmospheric turbulence near the ground part2 single point data for strong winds (neutral atmosphere), ESDU Item, 85020.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Takemi T. Large-eddy simulation studies for predicting plume concentrations around nuclear facilities using an overlapping technique. International Journal of Environment and Pollution. 2018;64(1/2/3):125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar