Raman identification and characterization of chemical components included in simulated nuclear fuel debris synthesized from uranium, stainless steel, and zirconium

References

• Grambow B, Nitta A, Shibata A, et al. Ten years after the NPP accident at Fukushima: review on fuel debris behavior in contact with water. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(1):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Tagami K, Watanabe Y, et al. Isotopic evidence of plutonium release into the environment from the Fukushima DNPP accident. Sci Rep. 2012;2:304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochiai A, Imoto J, Suetake M, et al. Uranium dioxides and debris fragments released to the environment with cesium-rich microparticles from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(5):2586–2594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin PG, Louvel M, Cipiccia S, et al. Provenance of uranium particulate contained within Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 ejecta material. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurihara E, Takehara M, Suetake M, et al. Particulate plutonium released from the Fukushima Daiichi meltdowns. Sci Total Environ. 2020;743:140539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissioning (IRID). Subsidy project of decommissioning and contaminated water management in the FY2017 Supplementary budgets, development of analysis and estimation technologies for fuel debris characterization, results for FY2019. Sep 2020. Available from: https://irid.or.jp/en/research/20190000-2/
   Google Scholar
• Kirishima A, Hirano M, Sasaki T, et al. Leaching of actinide elements from simulated fuel debris into seawater. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2015;52(10):1240–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Takeno Y, Kirishima A, et al. Leaching test of gamma-emitting Cs, Ru, Zr, and U from neutron-irradiated UO2/ZrO2 solid solutions in non-filtered surface seawater. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2015;52(2):147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Takeno Y, Kobayashi T, et al. Leaching behavior of gamma-emitting fission products and Np from neutron-irradiated UO2–ZrO2 solid solutions in non-filtered surface seawater. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53(3):303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumagai Y, Takano M, Watanabe M. Reaction of hydrogen peroxide with uranium zirconium oxide solid solution — zirconium hinders oxidative uranium dissolution. J Nucl Mater. 2017;497:54–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirishima A, Hirano M, Akiyama D, et al. Study on the leaching behavior of actinides from nuclear fuel debris. J Nucl Mater. 2018;502:169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirishima A, Nagatomo A, Akiyama D, et al. Study on the chemical structure and actinide leaching of MCCI debris. J Nucl Mater. 2019;527:151795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Sakamoto S, Akiyam D, et al. Leaching behavior of gamma-emitting fission products, calcium, and uranium from simulated MCCI debris in water. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2019;56(12):1092–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayoshi A, Jegou C, De Windt L, et al. Leaching behavior of prototypical corium samples: a step to understand the interactions between the fuel debris and water at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors. Nucl Eng Des. 2020;360:110522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi T, Maeda K, Katsuyama K. Leaching behavior of radionuclides from samples prepared from spent fuel rod comparable to core debris in the 1F NPS. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2021;58(4):383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirishima A, Akiyam D, Kumagai Y, et al. Structure, stability, and actinide leaching of simulated nuclear fuel debris synthesized from UO2, Zr, and stainless-steel. J Nucl Mater. 2022;567:153842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumagai Y, Kusaka R, Nakada M, et al. Uranium dissolution and uranyl peroxide formation by immersion of simulated fuel debris in aqueous H2O2 solution. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2022;59(8):961–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechta SV, Krushinov EV, Almjashev VI, et al. Phase diagram of the UO2–FeO1+x system. J Nucl Mater. 2007;362(1):46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almjashev VI, Barrachin M, Bechta SV, et al. Eutectic crystallization in the FeO1.5–UO2+x–ZrO2 system. J Nucl Mater. 2009;389(1):52–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almjashev VI, Barrachin M, Bechta SV, et al. Phase equilibria in the FeO1+x–UO2–ZrO2 system in the FeO1+x-enriched domain. J Nucl Mater. 2010;400(2):119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto Y, Takano M. Chemical state analysis of simulated corium debris by EXAFS. Prog Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;5:200–203.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama D, Akiyama H, Uehara A, et al. Phase analysis of uranium oxides after reaction with stainless steel components and ZrO2 at high temperature by XRD, XAFS, and SEM/EDX. J Nucl Mater. 2019;520:27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brissonneau L, Ikeuchi H, Piluso P, et al. Material characterization of the VULCANO corium concrete interaction test with concrete representative of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plants. J Nucl Mater. 2020;528:151860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumita T, Kitagaki T, Takano M, et al. Solidification and re-melting mechanisms of SUS-B4C eutectic mixture. J Nucl Mater. 2021;543:152527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen GC, Butler IS, Anh Tuan N. Characterization of uranium oxides by micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Nucl Mater. 1987;144(1–2):17–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manara D, Renker B. Raman spectra of stoichiometric and hyperstoichiometric uranium dioxide. J Nucl Mater. 2003;321(2–3):233–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler T, Burakov BE, Zirlin V, et al. A Raman spectroscopic study of high-uranium zircon from the Chernobyl “lava.” Eur J Mineral. 2005;17(6):883–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak EA, Alsecz A, Sajó IE, et al. Recognition of uranium oxides in soil particulate matter by means of μ-Raman spectrometry. J Nucl Mater. 2008;381(3):278–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H, Shoesmith D. Raman spectroscopic studies of defect structures and phase transition in hyper-stoichiometric UO2+x. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12(28):8108–8117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jégou C, Caraballo R, Peuget S, et al. Raman spectroscopy characterization of actinide oxides (U1-yPuy)O2: resistance to oxidation by the laser beam and examination of defects. J Nucl Mater. 2010;405(3):235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointurier F, Marie O. Identification of the chemical forms of uranium compounds in micrometer-size particles by means of micro-Raman spectrometry and scanning electron microscope. Spectrochim Acta B. 2010;65(9–10):797–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desgranges L, Baldinozzi G, Simon P, et al. Raman spectrum of U4O9: a new interpretation of damage lines in UO2. J Raman Spectrosc. 2012;43(3):455–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointurier F, Marie O. Use of micro-Raman spectrometry coupled with scanning electron microscopy to determine the chemical form of uranium compounds in micrometer-size particles. J Raman Spectrosc. 2013;44(12):1753–1759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimbretière G, Desgranges L, Jegou C, et al. Characterization of nuclear materials in extreme conditions: raman spectroscopy approach. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2014;61(4):2045–2051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao R, Bhagat RK, Salke NP, et al. Raman spectroscopic investigation of thorium dioxide–uranium dioxide (ThO2–UO2) fuel materials. Appl Spectrosc. 2014;68(1):44–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dml H, Jones AE, Goulermas JY, et al. Raman spectroscopy of uranium compounds and the use of multivariate analysis for visualization and classification. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;251:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebreton F, Horlait D, Caraballo R, et al. Peculiar behavior of (U,Am)O2-δ compounds for high americium contents evidenced by XRD, XAS, and Raman spectroscopy. Inorg Chem. 2015;54(20):9749–9760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elorrieta JM, Bonales LJ, Rodríguez-Villagra N, et al. A detailed Raman and X-ray study of UO2+x oxides and related structure transitions. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18(40):28209–28216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colle JY, Naji M, Sierig M, et al. A novel technique for Raman analysis of highly radioactive samples using any standard micro-Raman spectrometer. J Vis Exp. 2017;122:e54889.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim J, Youn YS, et al. Raman study on structure of U1-yGdyO2-x (y=0.005, 0.01, 0.03, 0.05 and 0.1) solid solutions. J Nucl Mater. 2017;486:216–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu G, Haes AJ, Forbes TZ. Detection and identification of solids, surfaces, and solutions of uranium using vibrational spectroscopy. Coord Chem Rev. 2018;374:314–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiryaev AA, Vlasova IE, Yapaskurt VO, et al. Forensic study of early stages of the Chernobyl accident: story of three hot particles. J Nucl Mater. 2018;511:83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epifano E, Naji M, Manara D, et al. Extreme multi-valence states in mixed actinide oxides. Commun Chem. 2019;2:59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miskowiec A, Niedziela JL, Spano TL, et al. Additional complexity in the Raman spectra of U3O8. J Nucl Mater. 2019;527:151790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert K, Prusnick TA, Kimani MM, et al. Assessing UO2 sample quality with μ-Raman spectroscopy. J Nucl Mater. 2019;514:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medyk L, Manara D, Colle JY, et al. Determination of the plutonium content and O/M ratio of (U,Pu)O2-x using Raman spectroscopy. J Nucl Mater. 2020;541:152439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiryaev AA, Burakov BE, Vlasova IE, et al. Study of mineral grains extracted from the Chernobyl “lava.” Mineral Petrol. 2020;114:489–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spano TL, Niedziela JL, Shields AE, et al. Structural, spectroscopic, and kinetic insight into the heating rate dependence of studtite and metastudtite dehydration. J Phys Chem C. 2020;124(49):26699–26713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusaka R, Kumagai Y, Yomogida T, et al. Distribution of studtite and metastudtite generated on the surface of U3O8: application of Raman imaging technique to uranium compound. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2021;58(6):629–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu KT, Zhang Y, Wei T, et al. An investigation of LnUO4 (Ln = Dy and Ho): structures, microstructures, uranium valences and magnetic properties. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2021;41(12):6000–6009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrasin L, Miro S, Jégou C, et al. Studtite formation assessed by Raman spectroscopy and 18O isotopic labeling during the oxidative dissolution of a MOX fuel. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125(35):19209–19218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama D, Kusaka R, Kumagai Y, et al. Study on the relation between the crystal structure and thermal stability of FeUO4 and CrUO4. J Nucl Mater. 2022;568:153847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosterman BD. Raman spectroscopic study of solid solution spinel oxides. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2011; 1087.http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/2476131
   Google Scholar
• D’Ipolito V, Andreozzi GB, Bersani D, et al. Raman fingerprint of chromate, aluminate and ferrite spinels. J Raman Spectrosc. 2015;46(12):1255–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Faria DLA, Silva SV, de Oliveira MT. Raman microspectroscopy of some iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. J Raman Spectrosc. 1997;28(11):873–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergerhoff G, Brown ID, Allen FH, et al., Crystallographic Databases, International Union of Crystallography, Chester; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall TA, Morris K, Law GTW, et al. Uranium fate during crystallization of magnetite from ferrihydrite in conditions relevant to the disposal of radioactive waste. Mineral Mag. 2015;79(6):1265–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidchenko I, Kvashnina KO, Yokosawa T, et al. Uranium redox transformations after U(VI) coprecipitation with magnetite nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(4):2217–2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts HE, Morris K, Law GTW, et al. Uranium(V) incorporation mechanisms and stability in Fe(II)/Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2017;4(10):421–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerisit S, Felmy AR, Ilton ES. Atomistic simulations of uranium incorporation into iron (hydr)oxides. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(7):2770–2776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender WM, Becker U. Quantum-mechanical investigation of the structures and energetics of uranium and plutonium incorporated into the magnetite (Fe3O4) lattice. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019;3(4):637–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Chen Q, Shih K, et al. Uranium(IV) incorporation into inverse spinel magnetite (FeFe2O4): a charge-balanced substitution case analysis. PramanaJ Phys. 2019;93:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoyannis CG, Orkoula M. Quantitative determination of the cubic, tetragonal and monoclinic phases in partially stabilized zirconias by Raman spectroscopy. J Mater Sci. 1994;29:5316–5320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Hahn JW, Han KR. Quantitative phase analysis in tetragonal-rich tetragonal/monoclinic two phase zirconia by Raman spectroscopy. J Mater Sci Lett. 1997;16:669–671.
   Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Hamaguchi H. Mode assignments of the Raman spectrum of monoclinic zirconia by isotopic exchange technique. Phys Stat Solidi B Res. 1997;203(2):557–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard PE, Barbéris P, Mirgorodsky AP, et al. Comparative lattice-dynamical study of the Raman spectra of monoclinic and tetragonal phases of zirconia and hafnia. J Am Ceram Soc. 2002;85(7):1745–1749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DJ, Jung HJ, Yang IS. Raman spectroscopy of tetragonal zirconia solid solutions. J Am Ceram Soc. 1993;76(8):2106–2108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar