136
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Influence of manufacturing uncertainty treatment on neutronics uncertainty analysis for lattice physics parameters in PWR-UO2 fuel assembly

ORCID Icon
Pages 1526-1537 | Received 19 Jan 2023, Accepted 24 May 2023, Published online: 09 Jul 2023

References

  • Pecchia M, Vasiliev A, Leray O, et al. New PSI methodology for manufacturing and technological uncertainty quantification. Proceedings of PHYSOR2014; 2014 September 28-October 3; Kyoto, Japan.
  • Canuti E, Petruzzi A, D’Auria F, et al. Sensitivity studies for the exercise I-1 of the OECD/UAM benchmark. Sci Technol Nucl Install. 2012;2012:817185. doi:10.1155/2012/817185
  • Fedon C, Garcia Cervantes EY, Salamon L, et al. Application of deterministic sampling methods for uncertainty quantification in manufacturing tolerances in neutron physics. Nucl Eng Design. 2021;373:111023. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.111023
  • Fujita T. An influence of manufacturing tolerances on pin-cell k-infinity of MOX fuel using data from the FUBILA experiment program. Proceedings of PHYSOR2022; 2022 May 15-20; Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Fujita T. Discrepancy of calculation results due to treatment of manufacturing uncertainties in fuel assembly geometry. Trans At Energy Soc Jpn. 2022. Fall Meeting; 2022; September 7-9; Ibaraki, Japan. 3G05. [in Japanese].
  • Macian R, Zimmermann MA, Chawla R. Statistical uncertainty analysis applied to fuel depletion calculations. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(6):875–885. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2007.9711325
  • Ivanov K, Avramova M, Kamerow S, et al. Benchmarks for uncertainty analysis in modelling (UAM) for the design, operation and safety analysis of LWRs volume I: specification and support data for neutronics cases (Phase I). NEA/NSC/DOC(2013)7. OECD/NEA/NSC; 2013.
  • Blyth T, Avramova M, Ivanov K, et al. Benchmarks for uncertainty analysis in modelling (UAM) for the design, operation and safety analysis of LWRs volume II: specification and support data for the core cases (Phase II) version 1.0 (Draft specification). NEA/NSC/DOC(2012)11. OECD/NEA/NSC; 2012.
  • Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, et al. Statistical distributions, fourth. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. doi: 10.1002/9780470627242
  • Lahaye S, de Saint Jean C. Choice of positive distribution law for nuclear data. EPJ Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;4:38. doi: 10.1051/epjn/2018047
  • Matsumoto M, Nishimura T. Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudorandom number generator. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul. 1998;8(1):3–30. doi: 10.1145/272991.272995
  • Leray O, Fiorito L, Rochman D, et al. Uncertainty propagation of fission product yields to nuclide composition and decay heat for a PWR UO2 fuel assembly. Prog Nucl Energy. 2017;101:486–495. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.033
  • CASMO5 user’s manual. USA: Studsvik Scandpower, Inc.; 2012. p. SSP–07/431.
  • Fujita T, Sakai T. Uncertainty analysis of the OECD/NEA LWR UAM benchmark phase I using CASMO5 with JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2020;57(7):858–873. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2020.1727373

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.