A Structural Validation of an Inventory Based on the Abridged Five Factor Circumplex Model (AB5C)

References

• Aluja , A. , García , O. and García , L. F. 2002 . A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO–PI–R, ZKPQ–III–R, EPQ–RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives . Personality and Individual Differences , 33 : 713 – 725 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluja , A. , García , Ó. , García , L. F. and Seisdedos , N. 2005 . Invariance of the “NEO–PI–R” factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses . Personality and Individual Differences , 38 : 1879 – 1889 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström , M. 2007 . Higher order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability . European Journal of Psychological Assessment , 23 : 63 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström , M. , Björklund , F. and Larsson , M. R. 2009 . Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally . Journal of Research in Personality , 43 : 335 – 344 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett , P. 2007 . Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit . Personality and Individual Differences , 42 : 815 – 824 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler , P. 1989 . Comparative fit indexes in structural models . Psychological Bulletin , 107 : 238 – 246 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne , M. W. and Cudeck , R. 1993 . “ Alternative ways of assessing model fit ” . In Testing structural equation models , Edited by: Bollen , K. A. and Long , J. S. 136 – 162 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Burke , A. L. and Witt , A. L. 2004 . Personality and high-maintenance employee behavior . Journal of Business and Psychology , 18 : 349 – 363 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah , C. S. , Drasgow , F. and Roberts , W. B. 2006 . Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No . Journal of Research in Personality , 40 : 359 – 376 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa , P. T. and McCrae , R. R. 1992a . Four ways five factors are basic . Personality and Individual Differences , 6 : 653 – 665 .
   Google Scholar
• Costa , P. T. and McCrae , R. R. 1992b . Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO–PI–R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO–FFI) professional manual , Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources .
   Google Scholar
• De Raad , B. 1998 . Five big, big five issues: Rationale, content, structure, status and crosscultural assessment . European Psychologist , 3 : 113 – 124 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Raad , B. and Barelds , D. P. H. 2008 . A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 94 : 347 – 364 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Raad , B. and Hofstee , W. K. B. 1993 . A circumplex approach to the five factor model: A facet structure of trait adjectives supplemented by trait verbs . Personality and Individual Differences , 15 : 493 – 505 .
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung , C. G. 2006 . Higher-order factors of the big five in a multi-informant sample . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91 : 1138 – 1151 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung , C. G. , Quilty , L. C. and Peterson , J. B. 2007 . Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 93 : 880 – 896 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman , M. J. 1990 . Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model . Annual Review of Psychology , 41 : 417 – 440 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman , M. J. 1997 . Higher-order factors of the big five . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 73 : 1246 – 1256 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards , L. K. and Edwards , A. L. 1991 . A principal-components analysis of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory factor scales . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 60 : 766 – 772 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García , L. F. , Aluja , A. , García , Ó. and Cuevas , L. 2005 . Is openness to experience an independent personality dimension? Convergent and discriminant validity of the openness domain and its NEO-PI-R facets . Journal of Individual Differences , 26 : 132 – 138 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg , L. R. 1990 . An alternative “Description of Personality”: The big-five factor structure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 59 : 1216 – 1229 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg , L. R. 1992 . The development of markers for the Big-Five structure . Psychological Assessment , 4 : 26 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg , L. R. 1993 . The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American . Psychologist , 48 : 26 – 34 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg , L. R. , Johnson , J. A. , Eber , H. W. , Hogan , R. , Ashton , M. C. Cloninger , C. R. 2006 . The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures . Journal of Research in Personality , 40 : 84 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson , J.-E. and Stahl , P. A. 2005 . STREAMS 3.0 user's guide , Mölndal, , Sweden : MultivariateWare HB .
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee , B. K. W. 2003 . “ Structures of personality traits ” . In Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology , Edited by: Millon , T. and Lerner , M. J. 231 – 254 . Hoboken, NJ : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee , B. K. W. , De Raad , B. and Goldberg , R. L. 1992 . Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 63 : 146 – 163 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John , O. P. 1990 . “ The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires ” . In Handbook of personality , Edited by: Pervin , L. A. 66 – 100 . New York : Guildford .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , A. J. and Ostendorf , F. 1993 . Clarification of the five-factor model with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65 : 563 – 576 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog , K. G. and Sörbom , D. 1993 . LISREL 8: User's reference guide , Chicago : Scientific Software International .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , K. and Ashton , M. C. 2006 . Further assessment of the HEXACO personality inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form . Psychological Assessment , 18 : 182 – 191 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae , R. R. and Costa , T. P. Jr. 1987 . Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 52 : 81 – 90 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae , R. R. and Terracciano, A. &78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project . 2005 . Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 88 : 547 – 561 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae , R. R. , Zonderman , A. B. , Costa , P. T. Jr. and Bond , M. H. 1996 . Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 70 : 552 – 566 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik , S. A. , James , L. R. , Van Alstine , J. , Bennett , N. , Lind , S. and Stilwell , C. D. 1989 . Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models . Psychological Bulletin , 105 : 430 – 445 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen , S. V. , Haddock , G. , Forsterling , F. and Keinonen , M. 2003 . Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures . European Journal of Personality , 17 : 413 – 433 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier , G. and Goldberg , L. R. 2001 . “ Assessing the big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales ” . In Big five assessment , Edited by: de Raad , B. and Perugini , M. 30 – 54 . Ashland, OH : Hogrefe & Huber Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Steiger , J. H. 2007 . Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling . Personality and Individual Differences , 42 : 893 – 898 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick , G. B. and Fidell , S. L. 2007 . Using multivariate statistics, , 5th ed. , Needham Heights, MA : Pearson Education, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins , J. S. 1980 . “ Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior ” . In Review of personality and social psychology , Edited by: Wheeler , L. Vol. 1 , 265 – 293 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman , M. , Kuhlman , D. M. , Joireman , J. , Teta , P. and Kraft , M. 1993 . A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65 : 757 – 768 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar