The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring Agentic and Communal Forms of Impression Management

References

• Abele, A.E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aube, J., & Koestner, R., Hodgins, H., & Craig, J. (1994). Masculine traits and reports of social functioning: Evidence for a positivity bias. Sex Roles, 31, 621–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Oxford, UK: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., & Bowden, E.M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckels, E.E., & Paulhus, D.L. (2013). Psychopaths’ self-reports: Negative impression management or antisocial identity? Manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W.K., & Foster, J.D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S.J. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp.115–138). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, R., & Geis, F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.H., & Withey, M.J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C.G., Thake, J., & Vilhena, N. (2010). Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 302–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C.G., Thake, J., & Weekes, J.R. (2012). Impression managers: Nice guys or serious criminals? Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnett, S., Koun, S., & Barber, P.J. (1981). Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A.E. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 90–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A.E. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S.T. (2009). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gebauer, J.E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G.R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., & O’Connor, B. (1987). The interpersonal circumplex as a behavior map. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 1019–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Goffin, R.D., & Boyd, A.C. (2009). Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology, 50, 151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A.K., & Sidanius, J. (2010). Preserving positive identities: Public and private regard for one's ingroup and susceptibility to stereotype threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R.R. (1998). Detecting fakers on a personnel test: Response latencies versus a standard validity scale. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 13, 387–398.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, R.R. (2008). Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of self-report personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R.R., Book, A.S., Edwards, A.J., Wasylkiw, L., & Starzyk, K.B. (2003). Experimental faking in self-reported psychopathology: Unidimensional or multidimensional? Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1107–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R.R., & Evoy, R.A. (2005). Personality inventory faking: A four-dimensional simulation of dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1307–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, R.R., & Fekken, G.C. (1989). Three common social desirability scales: Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D.N., Peacock, A.C., & Holden, R.R. (1982). Professional interviewers’ trait inferential structures for diverse occupational groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D.N., & Paulhus, D.L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M.R. Leary & R.H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kitching, S. & Paulhus, D.L. (2008, June). Why do psychopaths score lower on impression management scales? Poster presented at the Canadian Psychological Association annual meeting, Halifax, NS, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, V.S. Y., Bond, M.H., & Singelis, T.M. (1997). Pan cultural explanations for life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2006). Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self-deception on the criterion validity of personality measures: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L.A., & Ryan, A.M. (2000). Variance in faking across non-cognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L.A., & Ryan, A.M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 979–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, D.S. (1994). Dominance and friendliness: On the interaction of gender and situation. Journal of Personality, 61, 387–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T.M. S., & Sellbom, M. (2012). Examining the factor structure of the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy scale. Journal of PersonalityAssessment, 94, 244–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N.T., Biderman, M.D., & McDaniel, M.A. (2005). Effects of response instruction on faking a situational judgment test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias in questionnaires. In J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H.I. Braun, D.N. Jackson, & D.E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., Bruce, M.N., & Trapnell, P.D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., & John, O.P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic bias in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., & Jones, D.N. (in press). Measures of dark personalities. In G.J. Boyle, D.H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs. San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., Neumann, C.S., & Hare, R.D. (in press). Manual for the Self-Report Psychopathy scale. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., & Trapnell, P.D. (2008). Self-presentation: An agency-communion framework. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 492–517). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, & R.F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., Westlake, B., Calvez, S., & Harms, P.D. (in press). Self-presentation style in job interviews: The role of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauls, C.A., & Stemmler, G. (2003). Substance and bias in socially desirable responding. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R.L., McCrae, R.R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 582–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, R., & Hall, C.S. (1979). A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Gillis, J.R., & Bagby, R.M. (1990). The SIRS as a measure of malingering: Validation with a correctional sample. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of perceived personality trait relationships. In A.K. Romney, R.N. Shepard, & S.B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling (pp.134–162). New York, NY: Seminar.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, D.L., Snyder, C.R., & Pace, L.M. (1986). Dimensions of favorable self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 867–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackeim, H.A., & Gur, R.C. (1978). Self-deception, other-deception and consciousness. In G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2) pp. 139–197. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. Experiments on form, wording, and context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trapnell, P.D., & Campbell, J.D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the Five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapnell, P.D., & Paulhus, D.L. (2012). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uziel, L. (2010). Look at me, I’m happy and creative: The effect of impression management on behavior in social presence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1592–1602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., & Alessandri, G. (2013). Alpha and beta traits and egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement: A point of convergence between two research traditions. Journal of Personality, 81, 39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J.S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J.S. (1964). Convergences among stylistic response measures from objective personality tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24, 551–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J.S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about Psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Meehl (Vol. 2, pp. 89–113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J.S., & Holzmuller, A. (1981). Further evidence on androgyny and interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., & Buehner, M. (2009). Modeling socially desirable responding and its effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 548–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R.D. (2012). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Buhner, M., & Krumm, S. (2007). Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective. Psychology Science, 49, 291–307.
   Google Scholar