1,039
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of Carver and White's BIS/BAS Scales in a Diverse Sample of Young Adults

, , &
Pages 485-494 | Received 08 Jul 2012, Published online: 08 Jan 2014

References

  • Alloy, L.B., Abramson, L.Y., Walshaw, P.D., Cogswell, A., Grandin, L.D., Hughes, M.E., … Hogan, M.E. (2008). Behavioral approach system and behavioral inhibition system sensitivities and bipolar spectrum disorders: Prospective prediction of bipolar mood episodes. Bipolar Disorders, 10, 310–322.
  • Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P.Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203.
  • Byrne, B.B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measing instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.
  • Caci, H., Deschaux, O., & Baylé, F.J. (2007). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the BIS/BAS scales and the SPSRQ. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 987–998.
  • Carver, C.S., & White, T.L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
  • Cogswell, A., Alloy, L.B., van Dulmen, M.H. M., & Fresco, D.M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1649–1658.
  • Corr, P.J. (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333–352.
  • Cortina, J.M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
  • Fan, W., & Hancock, G.R. (2006). Impact of post hoc measurement model overspecification on structural parameter integrity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 748–764.
  • Fowles, D.C. (1987). Application of a behavioural theory of motivation to the concepts of anxiety and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 417–435.
  • Fowles, D.C. (1993). Biological variables in psychopathology: A psychobiological perspective. In P.B. Sutker & H.E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 57–82). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Fowles, D.C. (2007). The three arousal model: Implications of Gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17, 87–104.
  • Franken, I.H. A., Muris, P., & Rassin, E. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Dutch BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 25–30.
  • Gray, J.A. (1978). The 1977 Myers lecture: The neuropsychology of anxiety. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 417–434.
  • Gray, J.A. (Ed.). (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Gray, J.A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gray, J.A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gray, J.A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288.
  • Gray, J.A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement. Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 105–128). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Gray, J.A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Heubeck, B.G., Wilkinson, R.B., & Cologon, J. (1998). A second look at Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 785–800.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
  • Johnson, S.L., Turner, R.J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 25–36.
  • Jorm, A.F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A.S., Jacomb, P.A., Korten, A.E., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 49–58.
  • Knyazev, G.G., Slobodskaya, H.R., & Wilson, G.D. (2004). Comparison of the construct validity of the Gray–Wilson personality questionnaire and the BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1565–1582.
  • Leone, L., Perugini, M., Bagozzi, R.P., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2001). Construct validity and generalizability of the Carver–White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales. European Journal of Personality, 15, 373–390.
  • Little, R.J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
  • MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L.B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504.
  • Muller, J.M., & Wytykowska, A.M. (2005). Psychometric properties and validation of a Polish adaptation of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 795–805.
  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2011). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Newcomb, M.D., & Bentler, P.M. (1988). Impact of adolescent drug use and social support on problems of young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 64–75.
  • O’Connor, R.M., Stewart, S.H., & Watt, M.C. (2009). Distinguishing BAS risk for university students’ drinking, smoking, and gambling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 514–519.
  • Poythress, N.G., Skeem, J.L., Lilienfeld, S.O., Douglas, K.S., & Edens, J.F. (2009). Carver and White's (1994) BIS scale and Lykken's (1995) primary psychopath: A reply to Newman and Malterer (2009). Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 678–681.
  • Poythress, N.G., Skeem, J.L., Weir, J., Lilienfeld, S.O., Douglas, K.S., Edens, J.F., & Kennealy, P.J. (2008). Psychometric properties of Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales in a large sample of offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 732–737.
  • Quay, H.C. (1997). Inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 7–13.
  • Ross, S.R., Millis, S.R., Bonebright, T.L., & Bailley, S.E. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioral inhibition and activation scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 861–865.
  • Smillie, L.D., & Jackson, C.J. (2005). The appetitive motivation scale and other BAS measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 981–994.
  • Smillie, L.D., Pickering, A.D., & Jackson, C.J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–335.
  • Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Molto, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862.
  • Ullman, J.B., & Bentler, P.M. (2009). Structural equation modeling. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), The handbook of data analysis (pp. 431–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K.J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S.G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.