Personality Assessment in the Diagnostic Manuals: On Mindfulness, Multiple Methods, and Test Score Discontinuities

References

• Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations. (2006). Psychodynamic diagnostic manual. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2010). Rationale for revised “A” criteria for personality disorders and levels of personality functioning. Unpublished manuscript, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2012, December 1). American Psychiatric Association Board of Trustees approves DSM–5 (News release No. 12-43. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. (1900). Manual of international classification of causes of death. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, R. A. (2007). Mindfulness, assessment, and transdiagnostic processes. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 238–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, L. L., Parker, S. C., Nelson, B. W., & Siegel, D. J. (2014). The clinician as neuroarchitect: The importance of mindfulness and presence in clinical practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42, 218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Williams, E. L. (2006). The automaticity of social life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batstra, L., & Frances, A. (2011). Holding the line against diagnostic inflation in psychiatry. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81, 5–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., & Verheul, R. (2014). Specific personality traits and general personality dysfunction as predictors of the presence and severity of personality disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 410–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (1998). Implicit and self-attributed dependency needs in dependent and histrionic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2002). A process dissociation approach to objective–projective test score interrelationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 47–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2006a). A Freudian construct lost and reclaimed: The psychodynamics of personality pathology. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23, 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2006b). Self-schema priming and desire for test performance feedback: Further evaluation of a cognitive/interactionist model of interpersonal dependency. Self and Identity, 5, 110–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2007). Might the Rorschach be a projective test after all? Social projection of an undesired trait alters Rorschach Oral Dependency scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 354–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2009). Heisenberg, Kandinsky, and the heteromethod convergence problem: Lessons from within and beyond psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2011). Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: Improving psychological assessment in science and practice. Psychological Assessment, 23, 532–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2012). From dysfunction to adaptation: An interactionist model of dependency. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 291–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., Becker-Matero, N., Winarick, D. J., & Reichman, A. E. (2010). Interpersonal dependency in borderline personality disorder: Clinical context and empirical evidence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 109–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., Bianucci, V., Fishman, D. P., & Biars, J. W. (2014). Toward a firmer foundation for DSM–5.1: Domains of impairment in DSM–IV/DSM–5 personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., & Huprich, S. K. (2011). Beyond dysfunction and threshold-based classification: A multidimensional model of personality disorder diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., & McLeod, B. A. (in press). Beyond biology: Sex, gender, and personality disorders. In V. M. Brabender & J. L. Mihura (Eds.), Handbook of gender, sex, and psychological assessment. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brabender, V., & Whitehead, M. L. (2011). Using the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual in the training of the competent assessor. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bram, A. D., & Peebles, M. J. (2014). Psychological testing that matters: Creating a road map for effective treatment. Washington, DC: APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI–2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, P. J., & Cosgrove, L. (Eds.). (2004). Bias in psychiatric diagnosis. New York, NY: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. C., & Goldstein, E. G. (1981). Approaches to the diagnosis of borderline conditions by the use of psychological tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 563–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cates, J. A. (1999). The art of assessment in psychology: Ethics, expertise, and validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 631–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A. (1993). Manual for the Schedule of Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology and Personality, Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Cogswell, A. (2008). Explicitly rejecting an implicit dichotomy: Integrating two approaches to assessing dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO–FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. J., Koldobsky, N., Mulder, R., & Tyrer, P. (2011). Classifying personality disorder according to severity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, J. P., & Sprock, J. (2004). Effect of patient sex, clinician sex, and sex role on the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder: Models of underpathologizing and overpathologizing biases. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 583–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E. (1998). A cognitive design system approach for generating valid tests: Approaches to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3, 300–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzi, J. (2014). The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual M axis: Toward an articulation of what it can assess. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31, 119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J. (2013). Self-deception and self-knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 162, 379–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., … MacKillop, J. (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM–5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ganellen, R. J. (2007). Assessing normal and abnormal personality functioning: Strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 30–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganellen, R. J. (2008). Rorschach assessment of malingering and defensive response sets. In C. B. Gacono, F. B. Evans, N. Kaser-Boyd, & L. A. Gacono (Eds.), Handbook of forensic Rorschach assessment (pp. 89–119). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 67–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzillo, F., Lingiardi, V., & Del Corno, F. (2012). Towards the validation of three assessment instruments derived from the PDM M axis: The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Prototypes, the Core Preoccupations Questionnaire, and the Pathogenic Beliefs Questionnaire. Bolletino di Psichologia Applicata, 265, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzillo, F., Lingiardi, V., Del Corno, F., Genova, F., Bornstein, R. F., Gordon, R., & McWilliams, N. (in press). Clinicians’ emotional responses and PDM P axis personality disorders: A clinically relevant empirical investigation. Psychotherapy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, F., Vall, G., Peri, J. M., Bailles, E., Ferraz, L., Garriz, M., & Caseras, X. (2012). Personality disorders through the life course. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 763–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, E., & Hartmann, T. (2014). The impact of exposure to Internet-based information about the Rorschach and MMPI on psychiatric outpatients’ ability to simulate mentally healthy test performance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 432–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds.). (2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., … Morey, L. C. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM–5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C, Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L., (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 270–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, S., & Morf, C. C. (2009). Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1252–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huprich, S. K. (2011). Contributions from personality- and psychodynamically oriented assessment to the development of the DSM–5 personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 354–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huprich, S. K., Bornstein, R. F., & Schmitt, T. (2011). Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and classification of Axis II personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 557–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insel, T. R., & Wang, P. S. (2010). Rethinking mental illness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303, 1970–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephs, L., & Bornstein, R. F. (2011). Beyond the illusion of structural change: A process priming approach to psychotherapy outcome research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28, 420–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, R., & Yalof, J. A. (2010). The assessment competency. In M. B. Kenkel & R. L. Peterson (Eds.), Competency-based education for professional psychology (pp. 87–104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingiardi, V., McWilliams, N., Bornstein, R. F., Gazzillo, F., & Gordon, R. M. (2015). The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual, Version 2 (PDM–2): Assessing patients for improved clinical practice and research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32, 94–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobbestael, J., Cima, M., & Arntz, A. (2013). The relationship between adult reactive and proactive aggression, hostile interpretation bas, and antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 53–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, K. D. (2011). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology (pp. 313–324). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, S. H., & DeGruy, F. V. (2014). An introduction to primary care and psychology. American Psychologist, 69, 325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, N. (1994). Psychoanalytic diagnosis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, N. (2011). The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual: An effort to compensate for the limitations of descriptive psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., … Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., & Kurtz, J. E. (2006). Advancing personality assessment terminology: Time to retire “objective” and “projective” as personality test descriptors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 223–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., Mihura, J. L., Erard, R. E., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Rorschach Performance Assessment System: Administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Toledo, OH: Rorschach Performance Assessment System.
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T. (2011). Classifying personality disorders: An evolution-based alternative to an evidence-based approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 279–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltmanns, T. F., & Powers, A. D. (2013). Gender and personality disorders. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), Oxford textbook of psychopathology (pp. 206–218). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, J. (2008). Recent advances in research on personality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 4, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pincus, A. L., Sadler, P., Woody, E., Roche, M. J., Thomas, K. M., & Wright, A. G. C. (2014). Multimethod assessment of interpersonal dynamics. In C. J. Hopwood & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Multimethod clinical assessment (pp. 51–91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, R. (Ed.). (2005). Cognitive illusions. East Sussex, England: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Protopopescu, X., & Gerber, A. J. (2013). Bridging the gap between neuroscientific and psychodynamic models in child and adolescent psychiatry. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 22, 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomsky, A. S., Senn, J. M., Lahoud, M., & Gelfand, L. A. (2014). An informational pathway to the development of contamination-related memory bias. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 339–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2003). Standardizing DSM–IV diagnoses: The clinical applications of structured interviews. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 220–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostik [Psychodiagnostics]. Bern, Switzerland: Bircher. (Original work published 1921)
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2009). Comparative gender biases in models of personality disorder.Personality and Mental Health, 3, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C. P., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, R. (2010). Face validity in personality tests: Psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison. Quality and Quantity, 44, 749–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. L., Jazaieri, H., & Goldin, P. R. (2012). Mindfulness-based stress reduction effects on moral reasoning and decision making. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 504–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibinga, E. M. S., & Wu, A. W. (2010). Clinician mindfulness and patient safety. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304, 2532–2533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM–5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaney, K. L., & Maraun, M. D. (2008). A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis. Psychological Methods, 13, 376–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Williams, J. M. G. (2003). Mindfulness training and problem formulation. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 157–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrer, P., Crawford, M., Mulder, R., Blashfield, R., Farnam, A., Fossati, A., … Reed, G. M. (2011). The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD–11). Personality and Mental Health, 5, 246–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrer, P., & Johnson, T. (1996). Establishing the severity of personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1593–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanheule, S. (2012). Diagnosis in the field of psychotherapy: A plea for an alternative to the DSM–5.x. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 85, 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B. (2004). Rorschach Inkblot Method. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp. 553–588). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A. (2011). Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: A proposal for DSM–V. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 338–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2012). Measures to assess maladaptive variants of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of personality disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 278–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D. (2009). Know thyself. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 384–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2004). International classification of diseases and health related problems (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Zeigler-Hill, V., Fulton, J. J., & McLemore, C. (2012). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-esteem: Implications for mate retention strategies and perceived infidelity. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 670–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M., Chelminski, I., Young, D., Dalrymple, K., & Martinez, J. (2013). Is dimensional scoring of borderline personality disorder important only for subthreshold levels of severity? Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 244–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar