5,350
Views
541
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Statistical Developments and Applications

Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures

, &
Pages 223-237 | Received 10 Aug 2014, Published online: 29 Oct 2015

References

  • *Ackerman, R. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Robbins, R. W. (2012). An item response theory analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 141–155. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.645934
  • *Armon, G., Shirom, A., & Melamed, S. (2012). The big five personality factors as predictors of changes across time in burnout and its facets. Journal of Personality, 80, 403–427. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00731.x
  • *Bados, A., Gomez-Benito, J., & Balaguer, G. (2010). The State–Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: Does it really measure anxiety? Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 560–567. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.513295
  • *Barry, T. J., Hermans, D., Lenaert, B., Debeer, E., & Griffith, J. W. (2013). The eACS: Attentional control in the presence of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 777–782. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.014
  • Beauducel, A. (2011). Indeterminacy of factor score estimates in slightly misspecified confirmatory models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10, 583–598.
  • Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143. doi:10.1007/S11336-008-9100-1
  • Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.938596
  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
  • Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90115-R
  • *Brouwer, D., Meijer, R. R., Weekers, A. M., & Baneke, J. J. (2008). On the dimensionality of the Dispositional Hope Scale. Psychological Assessment, 20, 310–315. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.310
  • *Byrd, A. L., Kahn, R. E., & Pardini, D. A. (2012). A validation of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits in a community sample of young adult males. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 20–34. doi:10.1007/s10862-012-9315-4
  • Cattell, R. B. (1978). Scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • *Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., Franchi, M., Golmaryami, F. N., & Frick, P. J. (2014). The association between callous-unemotional traits and behavioral and academic adjustment in children: Further validation of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 819–200. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9384-z
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
  • *Coco, A. L., Ingoglia, S., & Lundqvist, L. O. (2014). The assessment of susceptibility to emotional contagion: A contribution to the Italian adaptation of the Emotional Contagion Scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 67–87. doi:10.1007/s10919-013-0166-9
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
  • *Davidson, M. M., Gervais, S. J., Canivez, G. L., & Cole, B. P. (2013). A psychometric examination of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale among college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 239–250. doi:10.1037/a0032075
  • *Ebesutani, C., McLeish, A. C., Luberto, C. M., Young, J., & Maack, D. J. (2013). A bifactor model of anxiety sensitivity: Analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index–3. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 452–464. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9400-3
  • *Ebesutani, C., Smith, A., Bernstein, A., Chorpita, B. F., & Higa-McMillan, C. (2011). A bifactor model of negative affectivity: Fear and distress components among younger and older youth. Psychological Assessment, 23, 679–691. doi:10.1037/a0023234
  • *Freedenthal, S., Lamis, D. A., Osman, A., Kahlo, D., & Gutierrez, P. M. (2011). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire–12 in samples of men and women. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 609–623. doi:10.1002/jclp.20782
  • *Gibbins, C., Toplak, M. E., Flora, D. B., Weiss, M. D., & Tannock, R. (2011). Evidence for a general factor model of ADHD in adults. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16, 635–644. doi:10.1177/1087054711416310
  • *Gignac, G. E., Palmer, B. R., & Stough, C. (2007). A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS–20: Corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 247–257. doi:10.1080/00223890701629730
  • *Gomez, R. (2012). Depression Anxiety Stress Scales: Factor structure and differential item functioning across women and men. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 687–691. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.025
  • *Gomez, R. (2014). ADHD bifactor model based on parent and teacher ratings of Malaysian children. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 47–51. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2013.10.009
  • *Gomez, R., Vance, A., & Gomez, R. M. (2013). Validity of the ADHD bifactor model in general community samples of adolescents and adults, and a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054713480034
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430–450. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430
  • Gustafsson, J. E., & Aberg-Bengtsson, L. (2010). Unidimensionality and the interpretability of psychological instruments. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs (pp. 97–121). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Haberman, S. J. (2008). When can subscores have value? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 204–229. doi:10.3102/1076998607302636
  • Haberman, S., Sinharay, S., & Puhan, G. (2008). Reporting subscores for institutions.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 79–95. doi:10.1348/000711007X248875
  • Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Joreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Huang, Y. C., & Lin, S. H. (2015). Development and validation of an inventory for measuring student attitudes toward calculus. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 48, 109–123. doi:10.1177/0748175614563314
  • *Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., Adamson, G., & Boduszek, D. (2013). The factor structure and composite reliability of the Profile of Emotional Distress. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 6, 1–12. doi:10.1017/S1754470X13000214
  • *Iani, L., Lauriola, M., & Costantini, M. (2014). A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in an Italian community sample. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 1–8. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-84
  • *Immekus, J. C., & Imbrie, P. K. (2008). Dimensionality assessment using full-information item bifactor analysis for graded response data: An illustration with the State Metacognition Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 695–709. doi:10.1177/0013164407313366
  • *Innamorati, M., Balsamo, M., Fairfield, B., Fabbricatore, M., Tamburello, A., & Saggino, A. (2014). Construct validity and reliability of the Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire: A comparison of three factor models. Depression Research and Treatment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1155/2014/972424
  • *Jonason, P. K., Kaufman, S. B., Webster, G. D., & Geher, G. (2013). What lies beneath the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Varied relations with the Big Five. Individual Differences Research, 11, 81–90.
  • *Jonason, P. K., & Luévano, V. X. (2013). Walking the thin line between efficiency and accuracy: Validity and structural properties of the Dirty Dozen. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 76–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.010
  • *Luciano, J. V., Barrada, J. R., Osma, J., & Garcia-Campayo, J., (2013). Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the HADS: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in fibromyalgia patients, Psychological Assessment, 26, 395–406. doi:10.1037/a0035284
  • *Martel, M. M., von Eye, A., & Nigg, J. (2012). Developmental differences in structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between childhood and adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 279–292. doi:10.1177/0165025412444077
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • *McKay, M. T., Boduszek, D., & Harvey, S. A. (2014). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A bifactor answer to the two-factor question? Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 654–660. doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.923436
  • *Norton, S., Cosco, T., Doyle, F., Done, J., & Sacker, A. (2013). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A meta confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74, 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.10.010
  • *Ogg, J. A., Bateman, L., Dedrick, R. F., & Suldo, S. M. (2014). The relationship between life satisfaction and ADHD symptoms in middle school students: Using a bifactor model. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054714521292
  • *Olatunji, B. O., Ebesutani, C., Haidt, J., & Sawchuk, C. N. (2014). Specificity of disgust domains in the prediction of contamination anxiety and avoidance: A multimodal examination. Behavior Therapy, 45, 469–481. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.02.006
  • *Olatunji, B. O., Ebesutani, C., & Reise, S. P. (2015). A bifactor model of disgust proneness: Examination of the Disgust Emotion Scale. Assessment, 22, 248–262. doi:10.1177/1073191114541673
  • *Osman, A., Gutierrez, P. M., Bagge, C. L., Fang, Q., & Emmerich, A. (2010). Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scales–Second edition: A reliable and useful instrument. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 1324–1345. doi:10.1002/jclp.20727
  • *Osman, A., Gutierrez, P. M., Smith, K., Fang, Q., Lozano, G., & Devine, A. (2010). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index–3: Analysis of dimensions, reliability estimates, and correlates in nonclinical samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 45–52. doi:10.1080/00223890903379332
  • *Osman, A., Williams, J. E., Espenschade, K., Gutierrez, P. M., Bailey, J. R., & Chowdhry, O. (2009). Further evidence of the reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) in psychiatric inpatient samples. Journal of Psychopathology Behavioral Assessment, 31, 302–314. doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9095-z
  • *Osman, A., Wong, J. L., Bagge, C. L., Freedenthal, S., Gutierrez, P. M., & Lozano, G. (2012). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales–21 (DASS–21): Further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 1322–1338. doi:10.1002/jclp.21908
  • *Reichenheim, M. E., Moraes, C. L., Oliveira, A. S. D., & Lobato, G. (2011). Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): Empirical evidence for a general factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 1–12. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-93
  • *Reininghaus, U., Priebe, S., & Bentall, R. P. (2013). Testing the psychopathology of psychosis: Evidence for a general psychosis dimension. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39, 884–895. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr182
  • Reise, S. P. (2012). Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  • *Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129–140. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Applying unidimensional item response theory models to psychological data. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA Handbook of Testing and Assessment in Psychology. Washington DC: APA.
  • *Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16, 19–31. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7
  • Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26. doi:10.1177/0013164412449831
  • Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154. doi:10.1007/S11336-008-9102-Z
  • Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/S11336-008-9101-0
  • Sinharay, S. (2013). A note on assessing the added value of subscores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32, 38–42. doi:10.1111/emip.12021
  • Sinharay, S., Puhan, G., & Haberman, S. J. (2011). An NCME instructional module on subscores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 29–40. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00208.x
  • *Stratton, K. J., Aggen, S. H., Richardson, L. K., Acierno, R., Kilpatrick, D. G., Gaboury, M. T., & Amstadter, A. B. (2013). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ–20) in a sample of Vietnamese adults. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54, 398–405. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.10.011
  • Stucky, B. D., & Edelen, M. O. (2014). Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. In S. P. Reise & D. A. Revicki (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment (pp.183–206). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., & Edelen, M. O. (2013). Using logistic approximations of marginal trace lines to develop short assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 41–57. doi:10.1177/0146621612462759
  • ten Berge, J. M., & Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69, 613–625. doi:10.1007/BF02289858
  • *Thege, B. K., Kovacs, E., & Balog, P. (2014). A bifactor model of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Health Psychology & Behavioural Medicine, 2, 529–540. doi:10.1080/21642850.2014.905208
  • *Toplak, M. E., Pitch, A., Flora, D. B., Iwenofy, L., Ghelani, K., Jain, U., & Tannock, R. (2009). The unity and diversity of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in ADHD: Evidence for a general factor with separable dimensions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 1137–1150. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9336-y
  • *Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Flora, D. B., Chen, W., Banaschewski, T., Buitelaar, J., … Faraone, S. V. (2012). The hierarchical factor model of ADHD: Invariant across age and national groupings? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 292–303. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02500.x
  • *Wiesner, M., & Schanding, G. T. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling, bifactor models, and standard confirmatory factor analysis models: Application to the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Teacher Form. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 751–763. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.001
  • *Wu, S. M., & Amtmann, D. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Perceived Stress Scale in Multiple Sclerosis. ISRN Rehabilitation, 2013, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2013/608356
  • *Xi, J., Bi, Q., Li, W., Shang, W., Yan, M., Yang, Y., … Zhang, H. (2012). Positive and negative relationships between anxiety and depression of patients in pain: A bifactor model analysis. PLoS One, 7, e47577. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047577
  • *Yang, F. M., & Jones, R. N. (2008). Measurement differences in depression: Chronic health-related and sociodemographic effects in older Americans. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 993–1004. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818ce4fa
  • *Yang, F. M., Tommet, D., & Jones, R. N. (2009). Disparities in self-reported geriatric depressive symptoms due to sociodemographic differences: An extension of the bi-factor item response theory model for use in differential item functioning. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 1025–1035. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.12.007
  • *Yap, S. C. Y., Donnellan, M. B., Schwartz, S. J., Kim., S. Y., Castillo, L. G., Zamboanga, B. L., … Vazsonyi, A. T. (2014). Investigating the structure and measurement invariance of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure in a multiethnic sample of college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 437–446. doi:10.1037/a0036253
  • *Young, M. A., Hutman, P., Enggasser, J. L., & Meesters, Y. (2014). Assessing usual depression symptoms: The Seasonality Assessment Form. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 112–121. doi:10.1007/s10862-014-9440-3
  • *Zhang, J., Cui, M., Wang, W., Wu, Q., Zhu, X., Miao, D., … Xiao, W. (2014). The coexistence of coping resources and specific coping styles in stress: Evidence from full information bifactor analysis. PLoS ONE, 9, e96451. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096451
  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach's α, Revelle's β, and McDonald's ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. doi:10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
  • Zinbarg, R., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., & McDonald, R. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωη. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 121–144. doi:10.1177/0146621605278814

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.