547
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Inconsistent Responding in a Criminal Forensic Setting: An Evaluation of the VRIN-r and TRIN-r Scales of the MMPI–2–RF

, , , &
Pages 286-296 | Received 18 Sep 2014, Published online: 04 Apr 2016

References

  • Arbisi, P. A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). An MMPI–2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The infrequence psychopathology scale, F(p). Psychological Assessment, 7, 424–131. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.424
  • Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. P. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84–94. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012a). Addressing challenges to MMPI–2–RF-based testimony: Questions and answers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 691–705. doi:10.1093/arclin/acs083
  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012b). Interpreting the MMPI–2–RF. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2011). MMPI–2–RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 Restructured Form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
  • Berry, D. T., Wetter, M. W., Baer, R. A., Widiger, T. A., Sumpter, J. C., Reynolds, S. K., & Hallam, R. A. (1991). Detection of random responding on the MMPI–2: Utility of F, Back F, and VRIN scales. Psychological Assessment, 3, 418–423.
  • Braxton, L. E., Calhoun, P. S., Williams, J. E., & Boggs, C. D. (2007). Validity rates of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality–2 in a VA medical center setting. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 5–15. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8801_02
  • Burger, G. K., Calsyn, R. J., Morse, G. A., Klinkenberg, W. D., & Trusty, M. L. (1997). Factor structure of the expanded brief psychiatric rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 451–454.
  • Butcher, J., Graham, J., Ben-Porath, Y., Tellegen, A., Dahlstorm, W., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI–2 manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Dingemans, P. M. A. J., Linszen, D. H., Lenior, M. E., & Smeets, R. M. W. (1995). Component structure of the Expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS–E). Psychopharmacology, 122, 263–267.
  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963). The Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
  • Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist, 54, 5–20. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.1.5
  • Frederick, R. I. (1997). Validity Indicator Profile. Minnetonka, MN: NCS Assessments.
  • Frederick, R. I. (2003). Validity Indicator Profile (Enhancement and Profile Report). Minnetonka, MN: Pearson Assessments.
  • Gallen, R. T., & Berry, D. T. (1996). Detection of random responding in MMPI–2 protocols. Assessment, 3, 171–178.
  • Graham, J. R. (2006). MMPI–2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Green, D., & Rosenfeld, B. (2011). Evaluating the gold standard: A review and meta-analysis of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 23, 95–107. doi:10.1037/a0021149
  • Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218–224.
  • Hafkenscheid, A. (1993). Reliability of a standardized and expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: A replication study. Acta Psychiatric Scandinavia, 88, 305–310.
  • Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Archer, R. P. (2010). Psychometric functioning of the MMPI–2–RF VRIN–r and TRIN–r scales with varying degrees of randomness, acquiescence, and counter-acquiescence. Psychological Assessment, 22, 87–95. doi:10.1037/a0017061
  • Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 491–498. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.491
  • Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 625–631. doi:10.1017/S1355617712000240
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lukoff, D., Nuechterlien, K., & Ventura, A. (1986). Manual for the Expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 261–276.
  • Mason, L. H., Shandera-Ochsner, A. L., Williamson, K. D., Harp, J. P., Edmundson, M., Berry, D. R., & High, W. R. (2013). Accuracy of MMPI–2–RF validity scales for identifying feigned PTSD symptoms, random responding, and genuine PTSD. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 585–593. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.819512
  • Morey, L. C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Pinsoneault, T. B. (2007). Detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 protocols. Psychological Assessment, 19, 159–164. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.159
  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Rogers, R., Payne, J. W., Berry, D. T. R., & Granacher, R. P. (2009). Use of the SIRS in comparison cases: An examination of its validity and generalizability. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 213–224. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9145-9
  • Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 473–489.
  • Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2010). Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI–2–RF validity scales. Psychological Assessment, 22, 757–767. doi:10.1037/a0020825
  • Sellbom, M., Toomey, J. A., Wygant, D. B., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2010). Utility of the MMPI–2–RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment, 22, 22–31. doi:10.1037/a0018222
  • Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2011). MMPI–2–RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 Restructured Form): Technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008).
  • Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). The MMPI–2 restructured clinical scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Thomas, A., Donnell, A. J., & Young, T. R. (2004). Factor structure and differential validity of the expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Assessment, 11, 177–187. doi:10.1177/1073191103262893
  • Thompson, A. H. (1975). Random responding and the questionnaire measurement of psychoticism. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 111–115. doi:10.2224/sbp.1975.3.2.111
  • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering. Toronto, ON, Canada: MultiHealth Systems.
  • Van Beek, J., Vujik, P. J., Harte, J. M., Smit, B. L., Nijman, H., & Scherder, E. J. (2014). The factor structure of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (Expanded version) in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1–14. doi:10.1177/0306624X14529077
  • Van Buuren, S., & Oudshoorn, C. G. M. (2000). Multivariate imputation by chained equations: MICE V1.0 user's manual (TNO Report PG/VGZ/00.038). Leiden, The Netherlands: TNO Prevention and Health.
  • Van Dyke, S. A., Millis, S. R., Axelrod, B. N., & Hanks, R. A. (2013). Assessing effort: Differentiating performance and symptom validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 1234–1246. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.835447
  • Ventura, J., Green, M. F., Shaner, A., & Lieberman, R. P. (1993).Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: The drift busters. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 3, 221–244.
  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third edition. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
  • Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence manual. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
  • Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Second edition (WIAT–II). San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
  • Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: NCS/Pearson.
  • Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence–Second edition manual. San Antonio, TX: NCS/Pearson.
  • Wetter, M. W., Baer, R. A., Berry, D. R., Smith, G. T., & Larsen, L. H. (1992). Sensitivity of MMPI–2 validity scales to random responding and malingering. Psychological Assessment, 4, 369–374. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.369
  • Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4 professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Wise, E. A. (2009). Selected MMPI–2 scores of forensic offenders in a community setting. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9, 299–309. doi:10.1080/15228930902936048
  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  • Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Stafford, K. P., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2010). Further validation of the MMPI–2 and MMPI–2–RF Response Bias scale: Findings from disability and criminal forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 22, 745–756. doi:10.1037/a0020042

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.