A Validation Study of the Need for Affect Questionnaire–Short Form in Legal Contexts

References

• Ambwani, S., & Chmielewski, J. F. (2013). Weighing the evidence: Social desirability, eating disorder symptomatology, and accuracy of self-reported body weight among men and women. Sex Roles. 68, 474–483. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0244-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, M., Gnambs, T., & Maio, G. R. (2012). A short measure of the need for affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 418–426. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.666921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34, 23–42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00925.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, P. R., Marcus, D. K., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2008). Is there an allegiance effect for assessment instruments? Actuarial risk assessment as an exemplar. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 346–360. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, J. A. (2005). Law and the emotions: The problems of affective forecasting. Indiana Law Journal, 8, 155–238.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., Miller, M. K., Nemeth, R. J., Page, G., & Musil, S. (2005). Juror reactions to jury duty: Perceptions of the system and potential stressors. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 321–346. doi:10.1002/bsl.635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., & Wiener, R. L. (Eds.). (2010). Emotion and the law: Psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, S. L. (2009). Principles and practice of trial consultation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, S. L., Griffin, M. P., & Cramer, R. J. (2010). The Witness Credibility Scale: An outcome measure for expert witness research. Behavioral Science & the Law, 28, 892–907. doi:10.1002/bsl.917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeldue, M. K., Cramer, R. J., Kehn, A., Crosby, J. W., Anastasi, J. S. (in press). Measuring attitudes about hate: Development of the Hate Crimes Beliefs Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. W., Jarvis, A., & Blair, G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, M. P., Miller, P. M., Li, E. Y., & Gutheil, T. G. (2012). Forensic experts' perceptions of expert bias. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 362–371. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin, E. P., Cramer, R. J., Griffin, D. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2012). Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40(1), 41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. J., Adams, D. D., & Brodsky, S. L. (2009). Jury selection in child sex abuse trials: A case analysis. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 18(2), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10538710902743974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. J., Brodsky, S. L., & DeCoster, J. (2009). Expert witness confidence and juror personality: Their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(1), 63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. J., Clark, J. W., Kehn, A., Burks, A. C., & Wechsler, H. J. (2014). A mock juror investigation of blame attribution in the punishment of hate crime perpetrators. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37, 551–557. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. J., Kehn, A., Pennington, C. R., Wechsler, H. J., Clark, J. W., & Nagle, J. (2013). An examination of sexual orientation- and transgender-based hate crimes in the post-Matthew Shepard era. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 355–368. doi:10.1037/a0031404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. J., Parrott, C. T., Gardner, B. O., Stroud, C. H., Boccaccini, M. T., Doevedo, L. F., & Griffin, M. P. (2014). An exploratory study of meta-factors of expert witness persuasion. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 1–11. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cush, R. K., & Delahunty, J. G. (2006). The influence of limiting instructions on processing and judgments of emotionally evocative evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law. 13, 110–123. doi:10.1375/pplt.13.1.110
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, A., Scherndl, T., & Kuhberger, A. (2013). A comprehensive review of reporting effect sizes in psychological journals: Are effect sizes really enough? Theory & Psychology. 23, 98–122. doi:10.1177/0959354312436870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. O., Titcomb, C., Cramer, R. J., Stroud, C. H., & Bate, B. P. (2013). Perceived personality similarity and perceptions of expert testimony. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 185–192. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckett, T., & Krampen, G. (2010). Empirical test of an integrative model explaining higher prevalence of subclinical depression in women: A normative sex-role orientation approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Research. 15, 144–160. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2010.00058.x
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2, 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69, 583–615. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.694156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, S. J. H. (2008). Societal threat, authoritarianism, conservatism, and U.S. state death penalty sentencing (1977–2004). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94, 913–923. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. L., & Brodsky, S. L. (2011). Risky business: Addressing the consequences of predicting violence. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law. 39, 396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Guarnera, L. A., & Rufino, K. A. (2013). Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them? Psychological Science, 24, 1889–1897. doi:10.1177/0956797613481812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 47, 90–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T. M. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2014). Occupational socialization's role in forensic psychologists' objectivity. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 14, 23–44. doi:10.1080/15228932.2013.863054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 200–211. doi:10.1037/a0035824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. P. (1998). SIMPLE: All-in-one programs for exploring interactions in moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 836–840. doi:10.1177/0013164498058005009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayburn, N. R., Mendoza, M., & Davison, G. C. (2003). Bystanders' perceptions of victims and perpetrators of hate crimes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1055–1074. doi:10.1177/0886260503254513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods. 17, 354–373. doi:10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, C. H., Cramer, R. J., & Miller, R. S. (2014). A trait-affect model of understanding perceptions of expert witness testimony. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 21, 333–350. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.815601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukas, A. A., & Cumming, G. (2014). Interpreting effect sizes: Toward a quantitative cumulative social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology. 44, 711–722. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullaway, M. (2004). Psychological perspectives on hate crime laws. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 10, 250–292. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.10.3.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wallendael, L., & Cutler, B. (2004). Limitations on empirical approaches to jury selection. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 4, 79–86. doi:10.1300/J158v04n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Varela, J. G., & Conroy, M. A. (2012). Professional competencies in forensic psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 43, 410–421. doi:10.1037/a0026776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C., Eth, S., & Leong, G. B. (2012). Commentary: Pursuing justice in death penalty trials. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40(1), 50–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wevodau, A. L., Cramer, R. J., Clark, J. W., & Kehn, A. (2014). The role of emotion and cognition in juror perceptions of victim impact statements. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 45–66. doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0203-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wevodau, A. L., Cramer, R. J., Kehn, A., & Clark, J. W. (2014). Why the impact? Negative affective change as a mediator of the effects of victim impact statements. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 29, 2884–2903. doi:10.1177/0886260514527170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, R. L., Krauss, D. A., & Lieberman, J. D. (2011). Mock jury research: Where do we go from here? Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 29, 467–479. doi:10.1002/bsl.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 913–934. doi:10.1177/0013164413495237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar