A Statistical Consideration Regarding the Threshold of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. doi:10.1037/a0029889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. (2009). Subtypes of psychopathy. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (pp. 113–132). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, J. (2015). Preventative detention decisions: Reliance on expert assessments and evidence of partisan allegiance within the Canadian context. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 74–91. doi:10.1002/bsl.2155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, J., & Forth, A. E. (2014). Prosecution-retained versus court-appointed experts: Comparing and contrasting risk assessment reports in preventative detention hearings. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 531–543. doi:10.1037/lhb0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Rufino, K. A., & Gardner, B. O. (2014). Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist–Revised factor and facet scores. Law & Human Behavior, 38, 337–345. doi:10.1037/lhb0000069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., & Murrie, D. C. (2008). Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower PCL–R scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 262–283. doi:10.1037/a0014523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, D. M., Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2007). Score metric equivalence of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL–R) across criminal offenders in North America and the United Kingdom: A critique of Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clark (2005) and new analyses. Assessment, 14(1), 44–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, D. M., Hare, R. D., Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (2004). A multigroup item response theory analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Psychological Assessment, 16, 155–168. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L. (2013). flexMIRTR version 2: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring [Computer software]. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, D. J., Kosson, D. S., & Michie, C. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL–R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531–542. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Psychological Assessment, 9, 3–14. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. (2005). Searching for the pan-cultural core of psychopathic personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 283–295. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. D., & Balsis, S. (2009). When less is more: How fewer diagnostic criteria can indicate more personality disorder pathology. Psychological Assessment, 21, 285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. D., Balsis, S., & Zimmerman, M. (2010). Challenges associated with a polythetic diagnostic system: Criteria combinations in the personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. D., & Reidy, T. J. (1998). Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy: Diagnostic dilemmas in classifying patterns of antisocial behavior in sentencing evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 16, 333–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Silva, K., Duggan, C., & McCarthy, L. (2004). Does treatment really make psychopaths worse? A review of the evidence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 163–177. doi:10.1521/pedi.18.2.163.32775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., & Formon, D. (2014). The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: A case law survey. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 248–255. doi:10.1037/lhb0000059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., Koller, J. P., & Bersoff, B. (2014). Investigating the role of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in United States case law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 96–107. doi:10.1037/a0035452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., & Hart, A. (2010). The use of measures of psychopathy in violence risk assessment. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 19–40). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F. (2006). Unresolved controversies concerning psychopathy: Implications for clinical and forensic decision making. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 59–65. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Boccaccini, M. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2010). Inter-rater reliability of the PCL–R total and factor scores among psychopathic sex offenders: Are personality features more prone to disagreement than behavioral features? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 106–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Keilen, A., Roskamp, P., & Anthony, C. (2005). Predictions of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: Is it time to “disinvent the wheel?” Law and Human Behavior, 29, 55–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Colwell, L. H., Desforges, D. M., & Fernandez, K. (2005). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: Are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 603–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., & Cox, J. (2012). Examining the prevalence, role and impact of evidence regarding antisocial personality, sociopathy and psychopathy in capital cases: A survey of defense team members. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 239–255. doi:10.1002/bsl.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., DeMatteo, D., & Sörman, K. (2015). How reliable are Psychopathy Checklist–Revised scores in Canadian criminal trials? A case law review. Psychological Assessment, 27, 447–456. doi:10.1037/pas0000048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Marcus, D. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 131–144. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Petrila, J., & Kelley, S.E. (in press). Legal and ethical issues in the assessment and treatment of psychopathy. In C. Patrick (Ed.) Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, J. P., Ruscio, J., Knight, R. A., & Hare, R. D. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: Evidence for dimensionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Edens, J. F., Anthony, C., & Douglas, K. S. (2005). Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1056–1064. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Kusaj, C., Packer, I. K., & Douglas, K. S. (2015). Influence of the HCR-20, LS/CMI, and PCL–R on decisions about parole suitability among lifers. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 232–243. doi:10.1037/lhb0000111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised technical manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D., Clark, D., Grann, M., & Thornton, D. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL–R: An international perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 623–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, S. W., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Psychological Assessment, 25, 233–243. doi:10.1037/a0030391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(Part 1), 139–170. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, M. C., Douglas, K. S., Winter, E. A., & Edens, J. F. (2013). Construct measurement quality improves predictive accuracy in violence risk assessment: An illustration using the Personality Assessment Inventory. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 477–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeandarme, I., Edens, J. F., Habets, P., Bruckers, L., Oei, K., & Bogaerts, S. (2017). Psychopathy Checklist–Revised field validity in prison and hospital settings. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 29–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennealy, P. J., Skeem, J. L., Walters, G. D., & Camp, J. (2010). Do core interpersonal and affective traits of PCL–R psychopathy interact with antisocial behavior and disinhibition to predict violence? Psychological Assessment, 22, 569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhiem, O., Kolko, D. J., & Yu, L. (2013). Quantifying diagnostic uncertainty using item response theory: The posterior probability of diagnosis index. Psychological Assessment, 25, 456–466. doi:10.1037/a0031392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. D., Clark, H. J., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between Psychopathy Checklist–Revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 323–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. S., Kimonis, E. R., Otto, R. K., Kline, S. M., & Wasserman, A. L. (2012). Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings. Psychological Assessment, 24, 944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokros, A., Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., Santtila, P., Habermeyer, E., & Nitschke, J. (2015). Variants of psychopathy in adult male offenders: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 372–386. doi:10.1037/abn0000042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokros, A., Vohs, K., & Habermeyer, E. (2014). Psychopathy and violent reoffending in German-speaking countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 117–129. doi:10.1028/1015-5759
   Google Scholar
• Motzkin, J. C., Newman, J. P., Kiehl, K. A., & Koenigs, M. (2011). Reduced prefrontal connectivity in psychopathy. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17348–17357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M., Johnson, J., & Janke, C. (2008). Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations? Law and Human Behavior, 32, 352–362. doi:10.1007/s/10979-007-9097-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater dis(agreement) on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 19–53. doi:10.1037/a0014897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Marcus, D. K., Douglas, K. S., Lee, Z., Salekin, R. T., & Vincent, G. (2007). Youth with psychopathy features are not a discrete class: A taxometric analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 714–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, I., & Han, K. T. (2013). IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows (item response theory for patient-reported outcomes). Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 242–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poythress, N. G., Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Douglas, K. S., Frick, P. J., … Wang, T. (2010). Identifying subtypes among offenders with antisocial personality disorder: A cluster-analytic study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 389–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Dion, K. (1991). Rethinking the DSM III–R diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 19(1), 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445. doi:10.1037/a0008512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J., Johansson, P., Andershed, H., Kerr, M., & Louden, J. E. (2007). Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 395–409. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturup, J., Edens, J. F., Sörman, K., Karlberg, D., Fredriksson, B., & Kristiansson, M. (2014). Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised among life sentenced prisoners in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 315–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 141–186). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., & Orlando, M. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 73–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. B., Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., & Harris, P. B. (2015). Jurors report that risk measure scores matter in sexually violent predator trials, but that other factors matter more. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 56–73. doi:10.1002/bsl.2154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G. M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17, 377–395. doi:10.1177/1073191109359587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitacco, M. J., Neumann, C. S., & Jackson, R. L. (2005). Testing a four-factor model of psychopathy and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., Gray, N. S., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., Rogers, R., Taylor, J., & Snowden, R. J. (2007). A taxometric analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV): Further evidence of dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 19, 330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., & Heilbrun, K. (2010). Violence risk assessment and Facet 4 of the Psychopathy Checklist: Predicting institutional and community aggression in two forensic samples. Assessment, 17, 259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi:10.1037/a0020473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar