An Inventory of Problems–29 Study on Random Responding Using Experimental Feigners, Honest Controls, and Computer-Generated Data

References

• Archer, R. P., & Elkins, D. E. (1999). Identification of random responding on the MMPI-A. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(3), 407–421. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7303_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, R. A., Kroll, L. S., Rinaldo, J., & Ballenger, J. (1999). Detecting and discriminating between random responding and overreporting on the MMPI-A. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72(2), 308–320. doi:10.1207/S15327752JP720213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (2015). Personality assessment in the diagnostic manuals: On mindfulness, multiple methods, and test score discontinuities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(5), 446–455. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1027346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Erard, R. E., & Evans, F. B. (2017). The Rorschach in multimethod forensic assessment conceptual foundations and practical applications. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fronczyk, K. (2014). The identification of random or careless responding in questionnaires: The example of the NEO-FFI. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 459–473.
   Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Ales, F., de Campora, G., Zennaro, A., & Pignolo, C. (2017). Developing age and gender adjusted normative reference values for the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(4), 705–714. doi:10.1007/s10862-017-9611-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Lettieri, S. C., Zizolfi, S., Zizolfi, D., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., … Zennaro, A. (2019). Beyond rare-symptoms endorsement: A clinical comparison simulation study using the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, Advance Online Publication, 23(1), 203–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09357-7
   Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2018). A clinical comparison, simulation study testing the validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an Italian sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 340. doi:10.1007/s12207-018-9314-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2019). An Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29) sensitivity study investigating feigning of four different symptom presentations via malingering experimental paradigm. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi:10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. L. (1991). The MMPI-2/MMPI: An interpretative manual. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. New York: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., Bowling, N. A., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2015). Detecting insufficient effort responding with an infrequency scale: Evaluating validity and participant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 299–311. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9357-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, J. W., Webb, C., Peterson, D., Roussin, L., & Flanagan, E. H. (2016). Development of a response inconsistency scale for the personality inventory for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(4), 351–359. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Donnellan, M. B., Somma, A., Fossati, A., de Ruiter, C., … Vaughn, M. G. (2017). Detecting inconsistent responding on the youth psychopathic traits inventory–short form. Assessment, 26(3), 465–478 doi:10.1177/1073191117738048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePage, J., Mogge, N. L., & Garcia-Rea, E. A. (2009). Detecting random responding using the assessment of depression inventory: A brief screening measure of depression. Depression and Anxiety, 26(6), 592–595. doi:10.1002/da.20397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T. W. (2007). Toward international normative reference data for the comprehensive system. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(supp1), S201–S216. doi:10.1080/00223890701629342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., … Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128–165. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 548–605. doi:10.1037/a0029406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the personality assessment inventory (PAI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality assessment inventory (PAI). Professional manual. 2nd ed, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, D. S., Greene, R. L., & Schmolck, P. (1989). Criteria for assessing inconsistent patterns of item endorsement on the MMPI: Rationale, development, and empirical trials. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(2), 239–250. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198903)45:2<239::AID-JCLP2270450210>3.0.CO;2-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W., & Blanchard, M. R. (2011). Random responding from participants is a threat to the validity of social science research results. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 220. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsoneault, T. B. (2007). Detecting random, partially random, and nonrandom Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 protocols. Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 159–164. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robie, C., Brown, D. J., & Beaty, J. C. (2007). Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(4), 489–509. doi:10.1007/s10869-007-9038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Bender, D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, J. A., Miskey, H. M., Brearly, T. W., Martindale, S. L., & Shura, R. D. (2017). Word Memory Test performance across cognitive domains, psychiatric presentations, and mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(3), 306–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive-processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299–314. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., & Landis, P. (2017). The development of the Inventory of Problems–29: A brief self-administered measure for discriminating bona fide from feigned psychiatric and cognitive complaints. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 534–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., Landis, P., McCullaugh, J. M., Pizitz, T. D., O’Brien, S., … Abramsky, A. (2018). Development and validation of the false disorder score: The focal scale of the inventory of problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, in Press, 1. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1492413
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M. (2011). Applicant faking: A look into the black box. The Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 49(1), 29–36.
   Google Scholar