Further Validation of the Response Inconsistency Scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5

References

• Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2018). The validity and clinical utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 response inconsistency scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 398–405. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI–2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, J. W., Webb, C., Peterson, D., Roussin, L., & Flanagan, E. H. (2016). Development of a response inconsistency scale for the personality inventory for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(4), 351–359. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 477–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, J. E., & Parrish, C. L. (2001). Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: The case of the NEO-PI-R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(2), 315–332. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7602_12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., … Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1195–1210. doi:10.1037/pas0000120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. D., Pocknell, V., & King, A. R. (2017). Lesbians and bisexual women and men have higher scores on the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) than heterosexual counterparts. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 119–124. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(1), 127–138. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6801_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Dhillon, S., & Bagby, R. M. (2018). Development and validation of an overreporting scale for the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID-5). Psychological Assessment, 30(5), 582–593. doi:10.1037/pas0000507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somma, A., Borroni, S., Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., & Fossati, A. (2018). Further evidence for the validity of a response inconsistency scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Italian community-dwelling adolescents, community-dwelling adults, and clinical adults. Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 929–940. doi:10.1037/pas0000547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20(3), 312–326. doi:10.1177/1073191113485810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters, C. A., & Bagby, R. M. (2018). A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1255–1260. doi:10.1037/pas0000605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62(2), 71–83. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. M., Rogers, R., Sharf, A. J., & Ross, C. A. (2019). Faking good: An investigation of social desirability and defensiveness in an inpatient sample with personality disorder traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(3), 253–263. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1455691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016). Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history. Psychological Medicine, 46(1), 1–10. doi:10.1017/S0033291715001543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pretsch, J., Alexopoulos, J., … Leising, D. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 518–540. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(9), 92. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar