Comparative Content Analysis of Self-Report Scales for Level of Personality Functioning

References

• Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., & Salekin, R. T. (2018). Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment, 596–607. doi:10.1177/1073191116676889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, D. S. (2019). The P-factor and what it means to be human: Commentary on criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 356–359. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1492928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332–346. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.583808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., First, M. B., & Oldham, J. M. (2018). Structured clinical interview for the DSM-5® alternative model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) module I level of personality functioning scale. Washington, DC: APPI.
   Google Scholar
• Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., & Verheul, R. (2014). Specific personality traits and general personality dysfunction as predictors of the presence and severity of personality disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 410–416. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.834825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blashfield, R. K., & Livesley, W. J. (1991). Metaphorical analysis of psychiatric classification as a psychological test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 262–270. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.100.3.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., Bianucci, V., Fishman, D. P., & Biars, J. W. (2014). Toward a firmer foundation for DSM-5.1: Domains of impairment in DSM-IV/DSM-5 personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(2), 212–224. doi:10.1521/pedi_2013_27_116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bram, A. D., & Yalof, J. (2015). Quantifying complexity: Personality assessment and its relationship with psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35(sup1), 74–97. doi:10.1080/07351690.2015.987595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2005). Dimensional versus categorical classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders and beyond: Comment on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(4), 551–556. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, A. J., Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2017). Exploring the assessment of the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders with the personality assessment inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(2), 211–218. doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1217872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Williams, C. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Development and use of the MMPI-2 content scales. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 227–257. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., Nuzum, H., & Ro, E. (2018). Manifestations of personality impairment severity: Comorbidity, course/prognosis, psychosocial dysfunction, and ‘borderline’ personality features. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 117–121. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment. Advance Online Publication, 31(12), 1412–1427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor, M. H., Distel, M. A., Trull, T. J., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Assessment of borderline personality features in population samples: Is the Personality Assessment Inventory–Borderline Features scale measurement invariant across sex and age? Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 125–130. doi:10.1037/a0014502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet, H. C., Mokkink, L. B., Mosmuller, D. G., & Terwee, C. B. (2017). Spearman–Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach's alpha: Different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85, 45–49. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, W. D., & Levy, K. N. (2012). Factor structure of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization in a nonclinical sample using exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 503–517. doi:10.1037/a0026264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foelsch, P. A., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., Somavia, J., Normandin, L., & Lenzenweger, M. F. (2000). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Initial psychometric properties. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., & Allison, E. (2015). Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(5), 575–609. doi:10.1521/pedi.2015.29.5.575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T. (2007). Fragmented selves: Temporality and identity in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 40(6), 379–387. doi:10.1159/000106468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., & Côté, A. (2019). Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM–5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(5), 438–447. doi:10.1037/per0000335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. J., Skadberg, R. M., Schmidt, M., Bierma, S., Shorter, R. L., & Waugh, M. H. (2018). It's not that Difficult: An Interrater Reliability Study of the DSM–5 Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1428982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. M., & Bornstein, R. F. (2018). Construct validity of the Psychodiagnostic Chart: A transdiagnostic measure of personality organization, personality syndromes, mental functioning, and symptomatology. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 35(2), 280–288. doi:10.1037/pap0000142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104–114. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. & (1989). MMPI Restandardization Committee. MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E.S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C.J. (2019). Research and assessment with the AMPD. In C. J. Hopwood, A. L. Mulay, & M. H. Waugh (Eds.), The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 77–95). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Good, E. W., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM–5 levels of personality functioning scale–self report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–10. doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Mulay, A. L., & Waugh, M. H. (Eds.). (2019). The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G., Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270–295. doi:10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huprich, S. K., Nelson, S. M., Meehan, K. B., Siefert, C. J., Haggerty, G., Sexton, J., … Baade, L. (2018). Introduction of the DSM-5 levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(6), 553–563. doi:10.1037/per0000264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report questionnaire for the assessment of the DSM–5 level of personality functioning scale: The LPFS brief form (LPFS-BF). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 192–197. doi:10.1037/per0000159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutsebaut, J., Kamphuis, J. H., Feenstra, D. J., Weekers, L. C., & De Saeger, H. (2017). Assessing DSM–5-oriented level of personality functioning: Development and psychometric evaluation of the semi-structured interview for personality functioning DSM–5 (STiP-5.1). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(1), 94–101. doi:10.1037/per0000197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. In Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–96). Amsterdam: Academic Press, INC, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobo, M. C., Blais, M. A., Baity, M. R., & Harley, R. (2007). Concurrent validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory Borderline Scales in patients seeking dialectical behavior therapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(1), 74–80. doi:10.1080/00223890709336837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A. (2004). The impact of item characteristics on item and scale validity. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 273–302. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. L. (1927). interpretation of educational Measurements. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N.Y.: World Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Identity: Recent findings and clinical implications. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 75(4), 969–1004. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2006.tb00065.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2016). What is personality? Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(2), 145–156. doi:10.1521/pedi.2106.30.2.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The personality inventory for DSM-5—brief form (PID-5-BF)—adult. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Kotov, R., Watson, D., Forbes, M. K., Eaton, N. R., Ruggero, C. J., … Zimmermann, J. (2018). Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 17(3), 282–293. doi:10.1002/wps.20478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 477–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 577–591. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzenweger, M. F., McClough, J. F., Clarkin, J. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2012). Exploring the interface of neurobehaviorally linked personality dimensions and personality organization in borderline personality disorder: The Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire and Inventory of Personality Organization. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(6), 902–918. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.6.902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, P. M. (2007). On preserving a legacy: Psychoanalysis and psychological testing. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(2), 208–230. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.24.2.208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. N. (2007). Manual for the dimensional assessment of personality problems-basic questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Port Huron, ON: Sigma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3(3), 635–694. doi:10.2466/pr0.1957.3.3.635
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, P., & Blatt, S. J. (2013). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition in normal and disrupted personality development: Retrospect and prospect. American Psychologist, 68(3), 172–183. doi:10.1037/a0032243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55(2), 95–107. doi:10.1037/h0056029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfie, J., & Swan, S. A. (2009). Representations of the caregiver–child relationship and of the self, and emotion regulation in the narratives of young children whose mothers have borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 993–1011. doi:10.1017/S0954579409000534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20(3), 370–383. doi:10.1177/1073191113486513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1986). Diagnostic taxa as open concepts: Metatheoretical and statistical questions about reliability and construct validity in the grand strategy of nosological revision. In T. Millon & G. L. Klerman (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Toward the DSM-IV (pp. 215–231). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1991). Classification of mental disorder as a collection of hypothetical constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(3), 289–293. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.100.3.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM–5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29(10), 1302–1308. doi:10.1037/pas0000450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 347–353. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulay, A. L., Cain, N. M., Waugh, M. H., Hopwood, C. J., Adler, J. M., Garcia, D. J., … Skadberg, R. (2018). Personality constructs and paradigms in the alternative DSM-5 model of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–10. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1477787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulay, A. L., Waugh, M. H., Finn, T. M., Jenna, E., Gilmore, M. A., Whitley, M. L., … & Gina, M. P. (2019). MMPI-2 Personality Disorder Spectra Scales. Archives of Assessment Psychology, 9(1), 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Edmundson, M., Sauer-Zavala, S., Lynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). Five-factor measure of borderline personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 475–487. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.672504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuzum, H., Shapiro, J. L., & Clark, L. A. (2019). Affect, behavior, and cognition in personality and functioning: An item-content approach to clarifying empirical overlap. Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 905–912. doi:10.1037/pas0000712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olajide, K., Munjiza, J., Moran, P., O'Connell, L., Newton-Howes, G., Bassett, P., … & Crawford, M. J. (2018). Development and psychometric properties of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD). Journal of Personality Disorders, 32(1), 44–56. doi:10.1521/pedi_2017_31_285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, 1, 224–239.
   Google Scholar
• Pincus, A. L. (2011). Some comments on nomology, diagnostic process, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM–5 proposal for personality and personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2(1), 41–53. doi:10.1037/a0021191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapaport, D., Schafer, R., Gill, M. M., & Holt, R. R. (1968). Diagnostic psychological testing. Madison, CT: Intl Universities Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, G. M. (2018). Progress in developing a classification of personality disorders for ICD‐11. World Psychiatry, 17(2), 227–229. doi:10.1002/wps.20533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rek, K., Thielmann, I., Henkle, M., Crawford, M., Piccirrilli, L., Graff, A., … Zimmermann, J. (2019, August 19). A comprehensive evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in clinical and non-clinical German samples. doi:10.31234/osf.io/unqhm.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G., Debast, I., & Van Alphen, S. P. J. (2017). Measuring personality functioning in older adults: Construct validity of the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning–Short Form (SIPP-SF). Aging & Mental Health, 21(7), 703–711. doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1154012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M. A., Hopwood, C. J., Edens, J. F., Morey, L. C., & Cox, J. (2018). Initial development of pathological personality trait domain measures using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(6), 564–574. doi:10.1037/per0000286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B. (2015). A review of the agreement between clinicians’ personality disorder diagnoses and those from other methods and sources. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22(1), 1–19. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utk.edu/10.1111/cpsp.12088. doi:10.1111/cpsp.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, C., & Wall, K. (2018). Personality pathology grows up: Adolescence as a sensitive period. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 111–116. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, C., Wright, A. G., Fowler, J. C., Frueh, B. C., Allen, J. G., Oldham, J., & Clark, L. A. (2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 387–398. doi:10.1037/abn0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siefert, C. J., Sexton, J., Meehan, K., Nelson, S., Haggerty, G., Dauphin, B., & Huprich, S. (2019). Development of a short-form for the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–11. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00223891.2019.1594842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 380–389. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepp, S. D., Scott, L. N., Morse, J. Q., Nolf, K. A., Hallquist, M. N., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2014). Emotion dysregulation as a maintenance factor of borderline personality disorder features. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(3), 657–666. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thylstrup, B., Simonsen, S., Nemery, C., Simonsen, E., Noll, J. F., Myatt, M. W., & Hesse, M. (2016). Assessment of personality-related levels of functioning: A pilot study of clinical assessment of the DSM-5 level of personality functioning based on a semi-structured interview. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 298. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1011-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trull, T. (2001). Structural Relations Between Borderline Personality Disorder Features and Putative Etiological Correlates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 471–481. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrer, P. (2005). The problem of severity in the classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(3), 309–314. doi:10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrer, P., Mulder, R., Kim, Y. R., & Crawford, M. J. (2019). The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 481–502. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheul, R., Andrea, H., Berghout, C. C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J. J. V., van der Kroft, P. J. A., … Fonagy, P. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity. Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 23–34. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrens, M. J. (2017). Transforming intraclass correlation coefficients with the Spearman–Brown formula. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85, 14–16. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, M. H., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Pincus, A. L., & Wright, A. G. C. (2017). Psychological Assessment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and Innovation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(2), 79–89. doi:10.1037/pro0000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed, N. C., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1990). Failure of Wiener and Harmon Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtle scales as personality descriptors and as validity indicators. Psychological Assessment, 2(3), 281–285. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.2.3.281
   Google Scholar
• Weekers, L. C., Hutsebaut, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2019). The Level of Personality Functioning Scale‐Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 3–14. doi:10.1002/pmh.1434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59(7), 595–613. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., Bach, B., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C., Hopwood, C. J., … Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2018). Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–11. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1465431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T., Livesley, W., & Clark, L. (2009). An Integrative Dimensional Classification of Personality Disorder. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 243–255. doi:10.1037/a0016606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (1966). Substantive dimensions of self-report in the MMPI item pool. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(22), 1–42. doi:10.1037/h0093901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, T. F., & Simms, L. J. (2016). Personality disorder models and their coverage of interpersonal problems. Personality Disorders, 7(1), 15–27. doi:10.1037/per0000140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Rev.). Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., Ehrenthal, J. C., Cierpka, M., Schauenburg, H., Doering, S., & Benecke, C. (2012). Assessing the level of structural integration using Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Implications for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 522–532. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.700664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(9). doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar