Exploring Gender Differences in Machiavellianism Using a Measurement Invariance Approach

References

• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 112–130. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 53–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorri, C., Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2017). Does the dark triad manifest similarly in men and women? Measurement invariance of the dirty dozen across sex. Current Psychology, 38: 659–675., doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9641-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorri, C., Marsh, H. W., Ubbiali, A., & Donati, D. (2016). Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance across gender of the Big Five Inventory through exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 88–99. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Collison, K.L., Vize, C.E., Miller, J.D., & Lynam, D.R. (2018). Development and preliminary validation of a Five Factor Model measure of Machiavellianism. Psychological Assessment, 30(10), 1401–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShong, H. L., Helle, A. C., Lengel, G. J., Meyer, N., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2017). Facets of the Dark Triad: Utilizing the five-factor model to describe Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 218–223. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowgwillo, E. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2017). Differentiating dark triad traits within and across interpersonal circumplex surfaces. Assessment, 24(1), 24–44. doi:10.1177/1073191116643161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 217–246. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117–144. doi:10.1080/03610739208253916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1993). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Davis, M. D. (2018). A gender role view of the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 102–105. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Icho, A., & Ireland, K. (2016). Resources, harshness, and unpredictability: The socioeconomic conditions associated with the Dark Triad traits. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1). doi:10.1177/1474704915623699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18. doi:10.1002/per.698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. doi:10.1037/a0019265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. doi:10.1002/per.1893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 679–682. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. doi:10.1177/1073191113514105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Duplicity among the Dark Triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329–342. doi:10.1037/pspp0000139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimstra, T. A., Sijtsema, J. J., Henrichs, J., & Cima, M. (2014). The Dark Triad of personality in adolescence: Psychometric properties of a concise measure and associations with adolescent adjustment from a multi-informant perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, D., Gaughan, E., Miller, J., Miller, D., Mullins-Sweatt, S., & Widiger, T. (2011). Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 108–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam, D. R., Sherman, E. D., Samuel, D., Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). Development of a short form of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment. Assessment, 20(6), 659–669. doi:10.1177/1073191113502072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesza, M., & Kalinowski, K. (2019). Dark triad and impulsivity – an ecological momentary assessment approach. Current Psychology, 1–9. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00320-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCredie, M. N., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Who are the Turkers? A characterization of MTurk workers using the personality assessment inventory. Assessment, 26(5), 759–766. doi:10.1177/1073191118760709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 369–403. doi:10.1177/1094428105283384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Crowe, M., Weiss, B., Maples-Keller, J. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Using online, crowdsourcing platforms for data collection in personality disorder research: The example of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(1), 26–34. doi:10.1037/per0000191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Hyatt, C. S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Carter, N. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference?. Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. doi:10.1111/jopy.12251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The Malevolent Side of Human Nature. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2011). Mplus User’s Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the Dark Triad and Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664. doi:10.1111/jopy.12126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechorro, P., Caramelo, V., Oliveira, J. P., Nunes, C., Curtis, S. R., & Jones, D. N. (2018). The Short Dark Triad (SD3): Adaptation and Psychometrics among At-Risk Male and Female Youths. Deviant Behavior, 40(3), 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollock, D., & Lui, P. P. (2016). Measurement invariance and the five-factor model of personality: Asian international and Euro American cultural groups. Assessment, 23(5), 571–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., South, S. C., & Griffin, S. A. (2015). Factorial Invariance of the Five-Factor Model Rating Form Across Gender. Assessment, 22(1), 65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical, Psychological Science, 1, 213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, E., & Jones, D. N. (2019). Gender differences moderate Machiavellianism and impulsivity: Implications for Dark Triad research. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 160–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vize, C.E., Collison, K.L., Miller, J.D., & Lynam, D.R. (in press). The “core” of the Dark Triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Differences among Dark Triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar