References
- (Asterisk Indicates Manuscripts Included In Meta-Analyses)
- Akirmak, U., & Ayla, P. (In press). How is time perspective related to burnout and job satisfaction? A conservation of resources perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 109667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109667
- *Alansari, M., Worrell, F. C., Rubie-Davies, C., & Webber, M. (2013). Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS) scores and academic outcomes in secondary school females in New Zealand. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2013.057687
- Andre, L., van Vianen, A. E. M., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Oort, F. J. (2018). Motivational power of future time perspective: Meta-analysis in education, work, and health. Plos One, 13(1), e0190492. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190492
- Andretta, J. R., Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2014). Predicting educational outcomes and psychological well-being in adolescents using time attitude profiles. Psychology in the Schools, 51(5), 434–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21762.
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- *Buhl, M., & Linder, D. (2009). Time perspectives in adolescence: Measurement, profiles, and links with personality characteristics and scholastic experience. Diskurs Kindheits Und Jugendforschung [Research on Child and Adolescent Development], 2, 197–216.
- *Çelik, E., Sahranç, Ü., Kaya, M., & Turan, M. E. (2017). Adolescent Time Attitude Scale: Adaptation into Turkish. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 249–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050210
- Chishima, Y., McKay, M. T., & Murakami, T. (2017). The reliability and validity of the Temporal Focus Scale in young Japanese Adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 230–235.
- *Chishima, Y., Murakami, T., Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2019). The Japanese Version of the Adolescent Time Inventory-Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) scale: Internal consistency, structural validity, and convergent validity. Assessment, 26(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116683800
- *Cole, J. C., Andretta, J. R., & McKay, M. T. (2017). An exploratory examination of the viability and meaningfulness of time attitudes profiles in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 146–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.046.
- Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Davis, M. A., & Cernas-Ortiz, D. A. (2017). Revisiting the structural and nomological validity of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 98–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.037.
- *Donati, M. A., Boncompagni, J., Scabia, A., Morsanyi, K., & Primi, C. (2019). Using the Adolescent Time Inventory—Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) to assess time attitudes in Italian adolescents and young adults: Psychometric properties and validity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5), 424–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418797020.
- Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 40, 532–538.
- Froiland, J. M., Worrell, F. C., & Oh, H. (2019). Teacher-student relationships, psychological need satisfaction, and happiness among diverse students. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 856–870. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22245
- Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
- Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 313–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12252
- *Juriševič, M., Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2017). Measuring time attitudes in Slovenia: Psychometric proprieties of the Adolescent and Adult Time Attitude Scale (AATI- TA). Psihološka Obzorja / Horizons of Psychology, 26, 89–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20419/2017.26.472
- Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- *Konowalczyk, S., Rade, F. C. A., & Mello, Z. R. (2019). Time perspective, sports club membership, and physical self-concept among adolescents: A person-centered approach. Journal of Adolescence, 72, 141–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.02.008
- *Konowalczyk, S., Mello, Z. R., Röske, L. A. S., Buhl, M., Heim, R., & Worrell, F. C. (2018). Adolescent and adult time inventory-time attitude scales: Validity and contributions to physical activity and self-concept in Spanish adolescents. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 7, 76–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000084.
- Labăr, A. V., & Ţepordei, A. M. (2019). The interplay between time perspective, internet use, and smart phone in-class multitasking: A mediation analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 33–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.050
- Loose, T., Du Pont, L. R., Acier, D., & El-Baalbaki, G. (2019). Time perspectives mediate the relationship between Personality traits, and alcohol consumption. Time & Society, 28(3), 1148–1166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X18758515.
- MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
- McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., & Percy, A. (2015). Further Evidence for a Bifactor Solution for the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Measurement and Conceptual Implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 219–222.
- *McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., Percy, A., Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2015). Reliability and factorial validity of Adolescent Time Inventory-Time Attitude (ATI-TA) scores in Scottish and Northern Irish adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 412–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.040.
- McKay, M. T., Morgan, G. B., Van Exel, N. J. A, & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Back to ‘the Future’: Evidence of a Bifactor Solution for Scores on the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 395–402.
- McKay, M. T., Percy, A., Goudie, A. J., Sumnall, H. R. & Cole, J. C. (2012). The Temporal Focus Scale: Factor Structure and association with alcohol use in a sample of Northern Irish school children. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1361–1368.
- McKay, M. T., & Worrell, F. C. (2020). Technical Comment on Stolarski, M., Zajenkowski, M., Jankowski, K. S., & Szymaniak, K. (2020). Deviation from the balanced time perspective: A systematic review of empirical relationships with psychological variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109772. Personality and Individual Differences, 165, 110132.
- McKay, M. T., Worrell, F. C., Temple, E. C., Perry, J. & Cole, J. C. (2015). Less is not always more: The case of the 36-item short form of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 68–71.
- *Mello, Z. R., Oladipo, S. E., Paoloni, V. C., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). Time perspective and risky behaviors among Nigerian young adults. Journal of Adult Development, 26(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9304-2
- *Mello, Z. R., Zhang, J. W., Barber, S. J., Paoloni, V. C., Howell, R. T., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Psychometric properties of time attitude scores in young, middle, and older adult samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 57–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.037.
- Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2007). The adolescent and adult time inventory – English. The University of California. https://faculty.sfsu.edu/∼zmello/content/adolescent-time-inventory.
- Mooney, A., Earl, J. K., Mooney, C. H., & Bateman, H. (2017). Using balanced time perspective to explain well-being and planning in retirement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01781
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Pyschometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
- Perry, J. L., Nicholls, A. R., Clough, P. J., & Crust, L. (2015). Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370
- Przepiorka, A., & Sobol-Kwapinska, M. (2020). People with positive time perspective are more grateful and happier: Gratitude mediates the relationship between time perspective and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00221-z.
- *Prow, R. M., Worrell, F. C., Andretta, J. R., & Mello, Z. R. (2016). Demographic differences in adolescent time attitude profiles in an urban high school: A person- oriented analysis using model-based clustering. Berkeley Review of Education, 6, 79–95. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4bb6r8n6 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5070/B86110030
- *Şahin-Baltaci, H., Tagay, Ö., Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2017). Psychometric properties of Turkish Adolescent Time Inventory-Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) scores. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, & Consultation, 6, 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000066.
- Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Schurer-Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001
- Shirai, T. (1997). The life-span developmental psychology of time perspective. Keisoshobo.
- Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., Zimbardo, P. G., Djarallah, S., Chorfi, M. S., Leite, U. d R., Lin, H., Lv, H., Bunjevac, T., Tomaš, T., Punek, J., Vrlec, A., Matić, J., Bokulić, M., Klicperová-Baker, M., … Boyd, J. N. (2014). A global look at time: A 24-country study of equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. SAGE Open, 4(1), 215824401351568–215824401351512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013515686
- StataCorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.
- Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society (Vol. 758, pp. 424–453).
- Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170.
- *Worrell, F. C., Andretta, J. R., Wells, K. E., Cole, J. C., & McKay, M. T. (In press, a). Time attitudes and mental well-being, psychological, and somatic symptomatology in final year high school students. Current Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00386-8.
- Worrell, F. C., McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., Zivkovic, U., Perry, J. R., Musil, B., & Mello, Z. R. (2018). A Theoretical Approach to the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory: Results from America, Australia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34, 41–51.
- *Worrell, F. C., Mello, Z. R., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., & Lonigro, A. (In press, b). Time perspective constructs in Albanian and Italian adolescents: Exploratory analyses. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120913493
- *Worrell, F. C., McKay, M. T., & Andretta, J. R. (2018). Psychometric properties of adolescent time inventory time attitude (ATI-TA) scores in three waves of longitudinal data. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000457
- *Worrell, F. C., Mello, Z. R., & Buhl, M. (2013). Introducing English and German versions of the Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS). Assessment, 20(4), 496–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110396202
- *Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2009). Convergent and discriminant validity of time attitude scores on the adolescent time perspective inventory. Diskurs Kindheits Und Jugendforschung, [Research on Child and Adolescent Development], 4, 185–196. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-334572.
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271