Acceptability and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Translation of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (SOS-10-E) Outside the United States: A Replication and Extension in a Latin American Context

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Bewick, B., Mullin, T., Gilbody, S., Connell, J., Cahill, J., Mellor-Clark, J., Richards, D., Unsworth, G., & Evans, C. (2013). The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.729069
   Google Scholar
• Blais, M. A. (2012). The Schwartz Outcome Scale – 10. Integrating Science and Practice, 2(2), 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, M. A., Lenderking, W. R., Baer, L., DeLorell, A., Peets, K., Leahy, L., & Burns, C. (1999). Development and initial validation of a brief mental health outcome measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-3015(11)70926-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, M. A., Malone, J. C., Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., O'Keefe, S. M., Renna, M., & Sinclair, S. J. (2013). Treatment as usual (TAU) for depression: A comparison of psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and combined treatment at a large academic medical center. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.). 50(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, M. A., Sinclair, S. J., Baity, M. R., Worth, J., Weiss, A. P., Ball, L. A., & Herman, J. (2012). Measuring outcomes in adult outpatient psychiatry. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2014). Adjusting incremental fit indices for nonnormality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(5), 460–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.933697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragomirecka, E., Lenderking, W. R., Motlova, L., Goppoldova, E., & Šelepova, P. (2006). A brief mental health outcomes measure: Translation and validation of the Czech version of the Schwartz Outcomes Scale-10. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 15(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1389-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, C. J., McGrath, L. D., Burlingame, G. M., Schaalje, G. B., Lambert, M. J., & Davies, D. R. (2002). The effects of repeated administrations on self-report and parent-report scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290202000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 180(01), 51–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.1.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Dolan, B., & Toriola, A. (1997). Detection of intra- and cross-cultural non-equivalence by simple methods in cross-cultural research: Evidence from a study of eating attitudes in Nigeria and Britain. Eating and Weight Disorders: EWD, 2(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyon, H., Kop, J.-L., Juhel, J., & Falissard, B. (2018). Measurement, ontology, and epistemology: Psychology needs pragmatism-realism. Theory & Psychology, 28(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318761606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty, G., Blake, M., Naraine, M., Siefert, C., & Blais, M. A. (2010). Construct validity of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10: Comparisons to interpersonal distress, Adult attachment, Alexithymia, the Five-Factor Model, Romantic Relationship length and ratings of childhood memories. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil, L., Dehghani, M., Fathali Lavasani, F., & Mahaki, B. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Schwartz Outcome Scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.90863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetse, M. J., Florax, R. J. G. M., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2010). Consequences of effect size heterogeneity for meta-analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Statistical Methods and Applications, 19(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-009-0125-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M., Hansen, N., & Harmon, S. (2010). Outcome Questionnaire System (The OQ System): Development and practical applications in healthcare settings. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: A guide for the psyhological therapies (pp. 141–155). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingamen, G., & Reisinger, C. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2. American Professional Credentialing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Laux, J. M., & Ahern, B. (2003). Concurrent validity of the Schwartz Outcome Scale with a chemically dependent population. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 24(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1874.2003.tb00177.x
   Google Scholar
• Laux, J. M., Young, J. L., McLaughlin, L. P., & Perera-Diltz, D. (2006). The development and evaluation of the French version of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (SOS-10-F). Canadian Journal of Counselling, 40(4), 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601087
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, H. R. (2008). Development of an Arabic version of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10: A brief mental health outcome measure. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 9(3), 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12785/JEPS/090311
   Google Scholar
• Montero, M. (2018). Community psychology: A Latin American creation. In R. Ardila (Ed.), Psychology in Latin America (pp. 195–219). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93569-0_9
   Google Scholar
• Nalbantoğlu Yılmaz, F. (2019). Comparison of different estimation methods used in confirmatory factor analyses in non-normal data: A Monte Carlo study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(4), 131–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Fields, S. A. (2002). Essentials of outcome assessment. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Oldford, R. W., & MacKay, R. J. (2000). Scientific method, statistical method and the speed of light. Statistical Science, 15(3), 254–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009212817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz, C., Mascialino, G., Proaño, K., & Evans, C. (2020). Psychological intervention change measurement in Latin America: Where from? Where to? Psychotherapy Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1750728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017). Use of Spanish declines among Latinos in major U.S. metros. http://pewrsr.ch/2yhit5k
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas-Vazquez, R. A., Rivas-Vazquez, A., Blais, M. A., Rey, G. J., Rivas-Vazquez, F., Jacobo, M., & Carrazana, E. J. (2001). Development of a Spanish version of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10: A brief mental health outcome measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(3), 436–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. J. (2010). Mental health care systems in Latin America and the Caribbean. International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 22(4), 317–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2010.500863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, S. V. (2007). Using reliability generalization methods to explore measurement error: An illustration using the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(3), 264–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701293908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio-Aparicio, M., Núñez-Núñez, R. M., Sánchez-Meca, J., López-Pina, J. A., Marín-Martínez, F., & López-López, J. A. (2020). The Padua Inventory-Washington State University revision of obsessions and compulsions: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). Art of statistics: Learning from data. Penguin Books, Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Tarescavage, A. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). Psychotherapeutic outcomes measures: A critical review for practitioners. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(9), 808–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebes, J. K. (2005). Community science, philosophy of science, and the practice of research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3–4), 213–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-3399-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, A., Feixas, G., Bados, A., Garcia-Grau, E., Salla, M., Medina, J. C., Montesano, A., Soriano, J., Medeiros-Ferreira, L., Canete, J., Corbella, S., Grau, A., Lana, F., & Evans, C. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation–Outcome measure. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1457–1466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S103079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (2011). Score reliability: A retrospective look back at 12 years of reliability generalization studies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(3), 159–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611409845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bergen, A., & de la Parra, G. (2002). OQ-45.2, Cuestionario para evaluación de resultados y evolución en psicoterapia: Adaptación, validación e indicaciones para su aplicación e interpretación. Terapia Psicológica, 20(2), 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference, American Psychological Association, S. D. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. L., Waehler, C. A., Laux, J. M., McDaniel, P. S., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2003). Four studies extending the utility of the Schwartz Outcome Scale (SOS-10). Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8002_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar