References
- ACT, Inc. (2017). The ACT® technical manual. ACT, Inc.
- Allport, G., & Odbert, H. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
- Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Wössmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4) (pp. 1–181). Elsevier.
- Anglim, J., Bozic, S., Little, J., & Lievens, F. (2018). Response distortion on personality tests in applicants: Comparing high-stakes to low-stakes medical settings . Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9796-8
- Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Personality and Performance, 9, 9–30.
- Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x
- Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2011). Item response modeling of forced-choice questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(3), 460–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410375112
- Burchett, D., & Bagby, R. M. (2014). Multimethod assessment of distortion. In C. J. Hopwood & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Multimethod clinical assessment (pp. 345–378). Guilford Press.
- Cao, M., & Drasgow, F. (2019). Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(11), 1347–1368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000414
- Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. Human Performance, 18(3), 267–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). Russell Sage Foundation.
- Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2003). An assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance, 16(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1601_4
- Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
- Gough, H. (1960). The Adjective Check List as a personality assessment research technique. Psychological Reports, 6(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1960.6.1.107
- Griffin, B., & Wilson, I. G. (2012). Faking good: Self-enhancement in medical school applicants. Medical Education, 46(5), 485–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04208.x
- Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.9
- Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The five-factor personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00245-1
- Hontangas, P. M., de la Torre, J., Ponsoda, V., Leenen, I., Morillo, D., & Abad, F. J. (2015). Comparing traditional and IRT scoring of forced-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39(8), 598–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621615585851
- Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student's life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391123010
- Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1304_3
- John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guilford Press.
- Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.03.005
- Meade, A. W. (2004). Psychometric problems and issues involved with creating and using ipsative measures for selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/0963179042596504
- Niessen, A. S. M., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2017). Measuring non-cognitive predictors in high-stakes contexts: The effect of self-presentation on self-report instruments used in admission to higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 183–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.014
- Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
- Poropat, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
- Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. [Database] https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
- Rubin, M. (2017). Do p values lose their meaning in exploratory analyses? It depends how you define the familywise error rate. Review of General Psychology, 21(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000123
- Sanchez, E., & Buddin, R. (2016). How accurate are self-reported high school courses, course grades, and grade point average? ACT, Inc.
- Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
- Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 966–974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966
- Sticca, F., Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Hall, N. C., Eberle, F., & Haag, L. (2017). Examining the accuracy of students’ self-reported academic grades from a correlational and a discrepancy perspective: Evidence from a longitudinal study. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187367
- Tett, R. P., Freund, K. A., Christiansen, N. D., Fox, K. E., & Coaster, J. (2012). Faking on self-report emotional intelligence and personality tests: Effects of faking opportunity, cognitive ability, and job type. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.017
- Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00973.x
- Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Dyomina, N. V., Morewitz, C. L., & Reilly, R. R. (2006). Forced-choice personality tests: A measure of personality and cognitive ability? Human Performance, 19(3), 175–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1903_1
- Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921969802
- Whitman, D. W., Van Rooy, D. L., Viswesvaran, C., & Alonso, A. (2008). The susceptibility of a mixed model measure of emotional intelligence to faking: A Solomon four-group design. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 44–63.