Internal Structure of Beck Hopelessness Scale: An Analysis of Method Effects Using the CT-C(M–1) Model

References

• Aish, A., & Wasserman, D. (2001). Does Beck's Hopelessness Scale really measure several components? Psychological Medicine, 31(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701003300
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. EEUU. http://www.apa.org/ethics
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Mplus Web Notes: N° 10. http://statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barredo, J., Aiken, E., van 't Wout-Frank, M., Greenberg, B. D., Carpenter, L. L., & Philip, N. S. (2019). Neuroimaging correlates of suicidality in decision-making circuits in posttraumatic stress disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(6), 861–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boduszek, D., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Construct validity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) among university students: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Psychological Assessment, 28(10), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifay, W., Lane, S. P., & Reise, S. P. (2016). Three concerns with applying a Bifactor Model as a structure of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(1), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616657069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. K., Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Grisham, J. R. (2000). Risk factors for suicide in psychiatric outpatients: A 20-year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.68.3.371
   Google Scholar
• Burns, G. L., Geiser, C., Servera, M., Becker, S. P., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2020). Application of the bifactor S – 1 model to multisource ratings of ADHD/ODD symptoms: An appropriate bifactor model for symptom ratings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(7), 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00629-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M. (2020). Multi-faceted constructs in abnormal psychology: Implications of the bifactor S-1 model for individual clinical assessment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(7), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00624-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M., Geiser, C., & Koch, T. (2016). Measuring method effects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416649624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Liporace, M., & Casullo, M. M. (2006). Validación factor de una escala para evaluar riesgo suicida [Factor validity of a scale to assess suicidal risk]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 21(1), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Kanter, P. E. (2017). El lugar de la psicología en las investigaciones empíricas del suicidio en argentina: Un estudio Bibliométrico [State of psychological empirical research on suicide in argentine: A bibliometric study]. Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2017.34.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Kanter, P. E., & Medrano, L. A. (2020). Commentary: Putting ‘emotional intelligences' in their place: Introducing the integrated model of affect-related individual differences.Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Kanter, P. E., Dominguez-Lara, S., Trógolo, M. A., & Medrano, L. A. (2018). Best practices in the use of bifactor models: Conceptual grounds, fit indices and complementary indicators. Revista Evaluar, 18(3), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n3.22221
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Kanter, P. E., García-Batista, Z. E., Moretti, L. S., & Medrano, L. A. (2019). Towards an explanatory model of suicidal ideation: The effects of cognitive emotional regulation strategies, affectivity and hopelessness. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, C., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: A comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological Methods, 13(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., & Watson, S. D. (2017). Confirmatory factor analysis of the combined social phobia scale and social interaction anxiety scale: Support for a bifactor model. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 70 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gönen, M. (2007). Analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves with SAS. SAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Granat, A., Gadassi, R., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., & Feldman, R. (2017). Maternal depression and anxiety, social synchrony, and infant regulation of negative and positive emotions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 17(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granö, N., Oksanen, J., Kallionpää, S., & Roine, M. (2017). Specificity and sensitivity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale for suicidal ideation among adolescents entering early intervention service. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 71(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2016.1227370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibzadeh, F., Habibzadeh, P., & Yadollahie, M. (2016). On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: The case of tests with continuous results. Biochemia Medica, 26, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, M., Zagorscak, P., Eid, M., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2020). Giving G a meaning: An application of the bifactor-(S-1) approach to realize a more symptom-oriented modeling of the beck depression inventory–II. Assessment, 27(7), 1429–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118803738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innamorati, M., Lester, D., Balsamo, M., Erbuto, D., Ricci, F., Amore, M., Girardi, P., & Pompili, M. (2014). Factor validity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in Italian medical patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(2), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9380-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Marcusson-Clavertz, D., Yoshiuchi, K., & Smyth, J. M. (2019). Potential benefits of integrating ecological momentary assessment data into mHealth care systems. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 13(1), 19.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0160-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliem, S., Lohmann, A., Mößle, T., & Brähler, E. (2018). Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): Results from a German representative population sample. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1646-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocalevent, R.-D., Finck, C., Pérez-Trujillo, M., Sautier, L., Zill, J., & Hinz, A. (2017). Standardization of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in the general population. Journal of Mental Health, 26(6), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1244717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, T., Kelava, A., & Eid, M. (2018). Analyzing different types of moderated method effects in confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1373595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227.supp
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Random intercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulic, I. M., Casullo, G. L., Crespi, M. C., & Marconi, A. (2009). Escala de Desesperanza BHS (A. Beck, 1974): Estudio de las propiedades psicométricas y baremización de la Adaptación Argentina [Beck Hopelessness Scale BHS (A. BECK, 1974): Psychometric study and standardization of Argentinian adaptation]. Anuario de Investigaciones, 16, 365–373.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011). pROC: An open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, L., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, G. (2017). Competing factor structures of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and its measurement invariance across clinical and non-clinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savalei, V., & Falk, C. F. (2014). Recovering substantive factor loadings in the presence of acquiescence bias: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.931800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, G., Lamis, D. A., Aguglia, A., Amerio, A., Nebbia, J., Geoffroy, P. A., … Amore, M. (2020). Hopelessness and its correlates with clinical outcomes in an outpatient setting. Journal of Affective Disorders, 263, 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.144
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, M., Mészáros, V., Sallay, J., Ajtay, G., Boross, V., Udvardy-Mészáros, À., Vizin, G., & Perczel-Forintos, D. (2016). The beck hopelessness scale. specific factors of method effects? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Test Commission. (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg's self‐esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujii, N., Shirakawa, O., Niwa, A., Yonemoto, N., Kawanishi, C., Yamamoto, K., Sugimoto, T., & Hirayasu, Y. (2020). Hopelessness is associated with repeated suicidal behaviors after discharge in patients admitted to emergency departments for attempted suicide. Journal of Affective Disorders, 272, 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecco, G. A., Flores-Kanter, P. E., & Luque, L. E. (2021). Análisis psicométrico del inventario de orientación suicida ISO-19, en adolescentes cordobeses escolarizados [Psychometric analysis of the Inventory of Suicide Orientation ISO-19, in scholarized adolescents]. Revista Evaluar, 21(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v21.n1.32831
   Google Scholar
• Weigold, A., Weigold, I. K., & Russell, E. J. (2013). Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods. Psychological Methods, 18(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, A., Brown, G. K., & Beck, A. T. (2009). Cognitive therapy for suicidal patiens. Scientific and clinical applications. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherall, K., Cleare, S., Eschle, S., Ferguson, E., O'Connor, D. B., O'Carroll, R. E., & O'Connor, R. C. (2018). From ideation to action: Differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 241, 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, E., & Roberts, B. W. (2020). Commentary on Hussey and Hughes (2020): Hidden Invalidity Among 15 Commonly Used Measures in Social and Personality Psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920957618.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Structural equation modeling. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics, Volume 26: Psychometrics (pp. 297–358). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Savalei, V. (2016). Improving the factor structure of psychological scales: The expanded format as an alternative to the likert scale format. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415596421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., Yuan, Z., Zhang, Q., Tang, F., Lin, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, L., & Xue, F. (2013). Identification of cardiovascular risk components in urban Chinese with metabolic syndrome and application to coronary heart disease prediction: A longitudinal study. PLoS One, 8(12), e84204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar