Developing and Validating a Short-Form Questionnaire for the Assessment of Seven Facets of Conscientiousness in Large-Scale Assessments

References

• Behr, D., Braun, M., & Dorer, B. (2016). Messinstrumente in internationalen Studien. GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (GESIS Survey Guidelines).
   Google Scholar
• Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Ressources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Danner, D., Rammstedt, B., Bluemke, M., Treiber, L., Berres, S., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2016). Die deutsche version des big five inventory 2 (BFI-2). GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (GESIS Survey Guidelines).
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, A., de Vries, R. E., & Born, M. P. (2011). Broad versus narrow traits: Conscientiousness and honesty-humility as predictors of academic criteria. European Journal of Personality, 25(5), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1991). Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence, 15(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(91)90028-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What no child left behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 105(3), 399–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2015). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden: Mit Online-Materialien (4., überarb. und erw. Aufl.). Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Emons, W. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 105–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & McDougall, F. (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiff, S., & Scherer, R. (2018). Still comparing apples with oranges? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampson, S. E., Goldberg, L. R., Vogt, T. M., & Dubanoski, J. P. (2007). Mechanisms by which childhood personality traits influence adult health status: Educational attainment and healthy behaviors. Health Psychology, 26(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 723–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00057-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Lt., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., Werner, K. M., Briskin, J. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 319–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2014). Predicting school success: Comparing conscientiousness, grit, and emotion regulation ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Harms, P. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 501–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, A. B., Schultze, M., & Grötsch, A. (2017). Following the ants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, L. E., Poropat, A. E., & MacCann, C. (2016). Conscientiousness in Education: Its conceptualization, assessment, and utility. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 155–185). Springer series on human exceptionality. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). On the shortcomings of shortened tests: A literature review. International Journal of Testing, 13(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2012.703734
   Google Scholar
• Leite, W. L., Huang, I.-C., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). Item selection for the development of short forms of scales using an ant colony optimization algorithm. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(3), 411–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. W., Steel, R. P., Loveland, J. M., & Gibson, L. W. (2004). An investigation of personality traits in relation to adolescent school absenteeism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000037637.20329.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCann, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Empirical identification of the major facets of conscientiousness. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCann, C., Lipnevich, A. A., Poropat, A. E., Wiemers, M. J., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). Self- and parent-rated facets of Conscientiousness predict academic outcomes: Parent-reports are more predictive, particularly for approach-oriented facets. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magidson, J. F., Roberts, B. W., Collado-Rodriguez, A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). Theory-driven intervention for changing personality: Expectancy value theory, behavioral activation, and conscientiousness. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1442–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Ugen, S., & Fischbach, A. (Eds.). (2014). Épreuves Standardisées. Bildungsmonitoring für Luxemburg. Nationaler Bericht 2011 | 2013 [Épreuves Standardisées: School monitoring for Luxembourg. National report 2011 to 2013]. Men.lu—Website of the Ministry of National Education, Children and Youth http://www.men.public.lu/catalogue-publications/secondaire/statistiques-analyses/autres-themes/epreuves-standard-11-13/epstan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meldrum, R. C., Petkovsek, M. A., Boutwell, B. B., & Young, J. T. N. (2017). Reassessing the relationship between general intelligence and self-control in childhood. Intelligence, 60, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migali, G., & Zucchelli, E. (2017). Personality traits, forgone health care and high school dropout: Evidence from US adolescents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998/2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Niepel, C., Greiff, S., Mohr, J. J., Fischer, J.-A., & Kranz, D. (2019). The English and German versions of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale: Establishing measurement invariance across nationality and gender groups. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 6(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000315
   Google Scholar
• Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaru, G., Witthöft, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2015). Methods matter: Testing competing models for designing short-scale big-five assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2013). On the prediction of academic performance with personality traits: A replication study. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peabody, D., & de Raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perugini, M., & Gallucci, M. (1997). A hierarchical faceted model of the big five. European Journal of Personality, 11(4), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199711)11:4 < 279::AID-PER282 > 3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. E. (2014a). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(Pt 2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. E. (2014b). Other-rated personality and academic performance: Evidence and implications. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: DR, 41, 71–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & Farmer, R. F. (2013). The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1137–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, K. G., Richardson, C. M. E., & Tueller, S. (2014). The short form of the revised almost perfect scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 368–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikoon, S. H., Brenneman, M., Kim, L. E., Khorramdel, L., MacCann, C., Burrus, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2016). Facets of conscientiousness and their differential relationships with cognitive ability factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. E. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00065-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. In Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the big five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeders, U., Wilhelm, O., & Olaru, G. (2016). The influence of item sampling on sex differences in knowledge tests. Intelligence, 58, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaney, R. B., Rice, K. G., Mobley, M., Trippi, J., & Ashby, J. S. (2001). The revised almost perfect scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Ryan, L. H., & Röcke, C. (2013). The day-to-day effects of conscientiousness on well-being. Research in Human Development, 10(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2013.760257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J., Gaspard, H., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2020). The Conscientiousness × interest compensation (CONIC) model: Generalizability across domains, outcomes, and predictors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017a). The next big five inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017b). Short and extra-short forms of the big five inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Y., Edmonds, G. W., Jackson, J. J., & Roberts, B. W. (2013). Longitudinal correlated changes in conscientiousness, preventative health-related behaviors, and self-perceived physical health. Journal of Personality, 81(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, N., Lenski, A., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2015). Using individual interest and conscientiousness to predict academic effort: Additive, synergistic, or compensatory effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T. (2010). The abbreviation of personality, or how to measure 200 personality scales with 200 items. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar