Character Strengths in Adults and Adolescents: Their Measurement and Association with Well-Being

References

• Aust, F., Barth, M. (2020). Papaja: Create AAPA manuscripts with R Markdown [Manual]. https://github.com/crsh/papaja
   Google Scholar
• Blanca, M. J., Ferragut, M., Ortiz-Tallo, M., & Bendayan, R. (2018). Life satisfaction and character strengths in Spanish early adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(5), 1247–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9865-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, T., Kerbeykian, T., & McGrath, R. E. (2019). Why are signature strengths and well-being related? Tests of multiple hypotheses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(6), 2095–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00170-2
   Google Scholar
• Bruna, M. O., Brabete, A. C., & Izquierdo, J. M. A. (2019). Reliability generalization as a seal of quality of substantive meta-analyses: The case of the VIA Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) and their relationships to life satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 122(3), 1167–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118779198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2013). Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.758305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buuren, S. v., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L., Connelly, B. S., & Geeza, A. A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: A meta-analytic multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team, R. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. D. (2014). The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]. Acta Psychologica, 148, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Yu, B., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, T., & Yuen, T. (2012). Factor structure of the chinese virtues questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(6), 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512450074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feraco, T., Casali, N., & Meneghetti, C. (2021). Do strengths converge into virtues? an item-, virtue-, and scale-level analysis of the italian values in action inventory of strengths-120. Journal of Personality Assessment, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1934481
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
   Google Scholar
• Gander, F., Hofmann, J., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2019). Character strengths – Stability, change, and relationships with well-being changes. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9690-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1241–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9380-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Kretzschmar, A. (2017). Evaluating dimensional distinctness with correlated-factor models: Limitations and suggestions. Intelligence, 62, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintz, S., Kramm, C., & Ruch, W. (2019). A meta-analysis of gender differences in character strengths and age, nation, and measure as moderators. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1414297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2021). Cross-sectional age differences in 24 character strengths: Five meta-analyses from early adolescence to late adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1871938
   Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, G., Brachel, R. v., & Thielsch, M. (2014). Selecting items for Big Five questionnaires: At what sample size do factor loadings stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391123010
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, K., & Pornprasertmanit, S. (2016). Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients: Evaluation of methods, recommendations, and software for composite measures. Psychological Methods, 21(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, K. (2019). MBESS: The MBESS r package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBESS
   Google Scholar
• Khumalo, I. P., Wissing, M. P., & Temane, Q. M. (2008). Exploring the validity of the values-in-action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in an African context. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2008.10820180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, A., & Gignac, G. E. (2019). At what sample size do latent variable correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 80, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littman-Ovadia, H., Lavy, S., & Boiman-Meshita, M. (2017). When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9739-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right-camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E. (2016). Measurement invariance in translations of the VIA inventory of strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E. (2019). Technical report: The VIA Assessment Suite for Adults: Development and initial evaluation. VIA Institute on Character.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E., & Walker, D. I. (2016). Factor structure of character strengths in youth: Consistency across ages and measures. Journal of Moral Education, 45(4), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1213709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E., & Wallace, N. (2021 Jan-Feb). Cross-validation of the VIA inventory of strengths-revised and its short forms. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1705465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3), 369–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105283384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, V., Cao, M., Marsh, H. W., Tay, L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2017). The factor structure of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): An item-level exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) bifactor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29(8), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, V. L., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, M. A., & Veprinsky, A. (2012). Correlation attenuation due to measurement error: A new approach using the bootstrap procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(5), 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412443963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partsch, M. V., Bluemke, M., & Lechner, C. M. (2021). Revisiting the hierarchical structure of the 24 VIA character strengths: Three global dimensions may suffice to capture their essence. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211017760
   Google Scholar
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 101–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2009). Classifying and measuring strengths of character. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 25–33). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005b). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E., (2005a). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill, III (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 93–98). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association; Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.777767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2019). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., Harzer, C., Proyer, R. T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010). Ways to happiness in German-speaking countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., & Stahlmann, A. (2020). 15 years after Peterson and Seligman (2004). A brief narrative review of the research on the 12 criteria for character strengths – The forgotten treasure of the VIA classification. In M. Brohm-Badry, C. Peifer, J. M. Greve, & B. Berend (Eds.), Zusammen wachsen –Förderung der positiv-psychologischen Entwicklung von Individuen, Organisationen und Gesellschaft (pp. 142–172). Pabst Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., Weber, M., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the german values in action inventory of strengths for youth (German VIA-Youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021326822957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell, F. A., Yates, T. M., Widaman, K. F., Reynolds, C. A., & Fabricius, W. V. (2019). Data harmonization: Establishing measurement invariance across different assessments of the same construct across adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 48(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2019.1622124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vylobkova, V., Heintz, S., Gander, F., Wagner, L., & Ruch, W. (2021). Convergence and psychometric properties of character strengths measures: The VIA-IS and the VIA-IS-R. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8zvjb
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, L., Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2019). Character Strengths and PERMA: Investigating the relationships of character strengths with a multidimensional framework of well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9695-z
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, L., Holenstein, M., Wepf, H., & Ruch, W. (2020). Character strengths are related to students' achievement, flow experiences, and enjoyment in teacher-centered learning, individual, and group work beyond cognitive ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., Ruch, W., & Huebner, E. S. (2013). Adaptation and initial validation of the German version of the students’ life satisfaction scale (German SLSS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. http://ggplot2.org
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K. (2020). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation [Manual]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (2016). Comparing dependent robust correlations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 69(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann, W. W. (1988). Multivariate reliability theory: Principles of symmetry and successful validation strategies. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 505–560). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions!: Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar