The Twenty Item Values Inventory (TwIVI) in Portuguese Adults: Factorial Structure, Internal Consistency, and Criterion-Related Validity

References

• Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The Structural Organization of Human Values-Evidence from Three Rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110362757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8(3), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1113–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, I., & Bardi, A. (2016). Should ratings of the importance of personal values be centered? Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). A hierarchical structure of basic human values in a third-order confirmatory factor analysis. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). The number of distinct basic values and their structure assessed by PVQ-40. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.655817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. J. C., & Moreira, P. A. S. (2021). Further evidences of the role moral foundations play on the psychological, sociopolitical, and spiritual domains using both a variable and person-centered approach. Centro de Investigação em Psicologia para o Desenvolvimento, Universidade Lusíada.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, R., & Peters, G. Y. (2017). Scale quality: alpha is an inadequate estimate and factor-analytic evidence is needed first of all. Health Psychology Review, 11(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1124240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danioni, F., & Barni, D. (2021). Value priorities, impression management and self-deceptive enhancement: Once again, much substance and a little bit of style. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2020.1778619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 cultural groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(3), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B. A., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epskamp, S. (2019). semPlot: Path Diagrams and Visual Analysis of Various SEM Packages' Output. R package version 1.1.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot
   Google Scholar
• Everett, J. A. C. (2013). The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLoS One, 8(12), e82131 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, G. (2021). Personal values and moral foundations: Examining relations and joint prediction of moral variables. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620933434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., & Schwartz, S. (2011). Whence differences in value priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1127–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Self-presentation styles in self-reports: Linking the general factors of response styles, personality traits, and values in a longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 14(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y. (2021). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kulin, J., & Meuleman, B. (2015). Human values and welfare state support in Europe: An east–west divide? European Sociological Review, 31(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marôco, J. (2021). Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics: 8a edição. ReportNumber, Lda.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left‐right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnev, M. (2021). Caveats of non-ipsatization of basic values: A review of issues and a simulation study. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104118
   Google Scholar
• Rudnev, M., Magun, V., & Schwartz, S. (2018). Relations among higher order values around the world. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(8), 1165–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118782644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, R., & McQuilkin, J. (2017). Many Kinds of Kindness: The Relationship Between Values and Prosocial Behaviour. In Roccas S., & Sagiv L. (Eds.), Values and behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_4
   Google Scholar
• Sandy, C. J., Gosling, S. D., Schwartz, S. H., & Koelkebeck, T. (2017). The development and validation of brief and ultrabrief measures of values. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savalei, V. (2018). On the computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(3), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2005). A statistically justified pairwise ML method for incomplete nonnormal data: A comparison with direct ML and pairwise ADF. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 cultural groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In Questionnaire development report of the European Social Survey (pp. 259–319). https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47(4), 929–288. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.474.0929
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2016). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. In T. Brosch, & D. Sander (Eds.), Handbook of value: Perspective from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology and sociology (pp. 63–84). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., Cieciuch, J., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Schoen, H., Silvester, J., Tabernero, C., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., … Zaleski, Z. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A Cross National Study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. (2021). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121998760
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinn, J. S. (2019). Mapping ideology: Combining the Schwartz value circumplex with evolutionary theory to explain ideological differences. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0165-5
   Google Scholar
• Sortheix, F. M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Values that underlie and undermine well–being: Variability across countries. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., Caprara, G., Dentale, F., & Schwartz, S. H. (2013). Voting and values: Reciprocal effects over time. Political Psychology, 34(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., Casconi, T., & Barbaranelli, C. (2009). Assessing the circular structure of the Portrait Values Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.4.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
   Google Scholar
• Wilkowski, B. M., Williamson, L. Z., Rivera, E., Fetterman, A., & Meier, B. P. (2021). What is the “opposite” of a value? A lexical investigation into the structure of generally undesirable goal content. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12670
   Google Scholar