Measurement Invariance of Moral Foundations across Population Strata

References

• Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apicella, C., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2020). Beyond WEIRD: A review of the last decade and a look ahead to the global laboratory of the future. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2022, March 4). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q6c9r
   Google Scholar
• Atari, M., Graham, J., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Foundations of morality in Iran. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atari, M., Lai, M. H. C., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., He, J., & Bender, M. (2021). Registered report: Testing ideological asymmetries in measurement invariance. Assessment, 28(3), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120983891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2017). Personalizing politics and realizing democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982868.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C. L., Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire: Independent scale validation in a New Zealand sample. Social Psychology, 45(6), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. E., Rice, K., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N., DeBlaere, C., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Choe, E. (2016). The moral foundations hypothesis does not replicate well in Black samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(4), e23–e30. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğruyol, B., Alper, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2019). The five-factor model of the moral foundations theory is stable across WEIRD and non-WEIRD cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral Foundations Theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 3(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021). Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1303–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Evaluating the evidence for the general factor of personality across multiple inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(5), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iurino, K., & Saucier, G. (2020). Testing measurement invariance of the moral foundations questionnaire across 27 countries. Assessment, 27(2), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118817916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS One, 7(8), e42366 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Okan, C. (2017). Good vs. evil: Predicting sinning with dark personality traits and moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, L. L., Rowatt, W. C., & Fergus, T. A. (2016). Moral foundations and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A preliminary examination. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 11, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2015, November 24). Measuring model fit. Retrieved January 31, 2022, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kivikangas, J. M., Fernández-Castilla, B., Järvelä, S., Ravaja, N., & Lönnqvist, J.-E. (2021). Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(1), 55–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (in press). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Nagengast, B., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Dicke, T. (2018). What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The moral foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self-reported donations, and actual donations to charity. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2019). The complex relation between receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit and political ideology. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1440–1450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219830415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2020). Moral foundations theory and the psychology of charitable giving. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2020). Who are the opponents of nudging? Insights from moral foundations theory. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2020.1756241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson, A., Montgomery, H., Dimdins, G., Sandgren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Taleny, A. (2020). Beyond ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives’: Complexity in ideology, moral intuitions, and worldview among Swedish voters. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review : DR, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P. (2012). Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton, P., & Irwing, P. (2011). The general factor of personality: Normal and abnormal. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 132–161). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., Kenner, J., Iurino, K., Bou Malham, P., Chen, Z., Thalmayer, A. G., Kemmelmeier, M., Tov, W., Boutti, R., Metaferia, H., Çankaya, B., Mastor, K. A., Hsu, K.-Y., Wu, R., Maniruzzaman, M., Rugira, J., Tsaousis, I., Sosnyuk, O., Regmi Adhikary, J., … Altschul, C. (2015). Cross-cultural differences in a global “survey of world views. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114551791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R. (2017). Moral foundations, intuitions of justice, and the intricacies of punitive sentiment. Law & Society Review, 51(2), 413–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2018). Utrikes föddas utbildningsbakgrund 2017 [Educational background 2017 among foreign born persons]. https://www.scb.se/publikation/36497
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2021). Sysselsättning bland flyktingar och deras anhöriga 2019 [Employment by refugees and their family members in 2019]. https://www.scb.se/publikation/41967
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., Johnson, B. B., Sibley, C. G., & Brandt, M. J. (2021). Conservatives' moral foundations are more densely connected than liberals' moral foundations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkel, J. G., & Brandt, M. J. (2019). The effect of ideological identification on the endorsement of moral values depends on the target group. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(6), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218798822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O., Harma, M., Bahçekapili, H. G., & Cesur, S. (2016). Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2021). Remapping the foundations of morality: Well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. PLoS One, 16(10), e0258910 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar