Contributions of Multimethod Personality Assessment in Indirect Evaluation

References

• Acklin, M. W. (2020). Beyond the boundaries: Ethical issues in the practice of indirect personality assessment in non-health-service psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1522639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, C. (2000, June). Harvard and the making of the Unabomber. The Atlantic. Retrieved April 29, 2022, from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/06/harvard-and-the-making-of-the-unabomber/378239/
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., & Salekin, R. T. (2018). Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment, 25(5), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116676889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2019). Uses and misuses of Ted Kaczynski’s MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1468337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2: Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) manual for administration. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.583808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørkly, S., Hartvig, P., Heggen, F. A., Brauer, H., & Moger, T. A. (2009). Development of a brief screen for violence risk (V-RISK-10) in acute and general psychiatry: An Introduction with emphasis on findings from a naturalistic test of interrater reliability. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 24(6), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagov, P. S., Bi, W., Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2012). The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Evaluating psychometric questions about its reliability, validity, and impact of its fixed score distribution. Assessment, 19(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112436667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. (2015). The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Developmental and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(6), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böckler, N., Allwinn, M., Metwaly, C., Wypych, B., Hoffmann, J., & Zick, A. (2020). Islamist Terrorists in Germany and their warning behaviors: A comparative assessment of attackers and other convicts using the TRAP-18. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 7(3-4), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000150
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., & Sellbom, M. (2020). Further validation of the MMPI-2-RF Personality Disorder Spectra scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 42(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09789-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., Hilsenroth, M., Guarnaccia, C., & Westen, D. (2007). Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Karmmer, B. (1989). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Hass, G. A., Greene, R. L., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Using the MMPI-2 in forensic assessment. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Haas, G. A., Greene, R. L., Nelson, L. D., Nichols, D. S., & Williams, C. L. (2018). Using the MMPI-2 in forensic assessment: Response to criticism about a case study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(2), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1965). Factor analysis: An introduction to essentials II. The role of factor analysis in research. Biometrics, 21(2), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challacombe, D. J., & Lucas, P. A. (2019). Postdicting violence with sovereign citizen actors: An exploratory test of the TRAP-18. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 6(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000105
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, K., Johansson, F., Kaati, L., & Mork, J. C. (2014). Detecting linguistic markers for radical violence in social media. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(1), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2014.849948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan, R., & Porcerelli, J. H. (2012). Test-retest reliability and discriminant validity of the SWAP-200 in a psychoanalytic treatment sample. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 85(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta, M. J., & Peralta, V. (1994). Lack of insight in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 20(2), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/20.2.359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. J., Skadberg, R. M., Schmidt, M., Bierma, S., Shorter, R. L., & Waugh, M. H. (2018). It’s not that difficult: An interrater reliability study of the DSM-5 Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1428982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. J., Waugh, M. H., Skadberg, R. M., Crittenden, E. B., Finn, M. T. M., Schmidt, M. R., & Kurdziel-Adams, G. (2021). Deconstructing criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(4), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heatherington, L., Messer, S. B., Angus, L., Strauman, T. J., Friedlander, M. L., & Kolden, G. H. (2012). The narrowing of theoretical orientations in clinical psychology doctoral training. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 19(4), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., & Goldstein, A. M. (2009). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollewell, G. F., & Longpré, N. (2021). Radicalization in the social media era: Understanding the relationship between self-radicalization and the internet. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211028771
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., Mulay, A. L., & Waugh, M. H. (2019). The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendell, R. E., Malcolm, D. E., & Adams, W. (1993). The problem of detecting changes in the incidence of schizophrenia. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 162(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.162.2.212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendler, K. S. (2016). Phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(10), 1082–1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendler, K. S. (2017). The clinical features of paranoia in the 20th century and their representation in diagnostic criteria from DSM-III through DSM-5. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(2), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremyar, A. J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2021). Further examining the construct validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) Personality Disorder Spectra scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1828434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, E., Shecter, O. (2011, May 25). Improved assessment of personality disorders that are security risks [Paper presentation]. International Applied Military Psychology Symposium (IAMPS), Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Laqueur, W. (2017). A history of terrorism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. Ronald Press Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzenweger, M. F. (2015). Factors underlying the psychological and behavioral characteristics of Office of Strategic Services candidates: The Assessment of Men data revisited. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.935980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin-Abellan, L. E., Mcgauley, G., Campbell, C. D., & Fonagy, P. (2014). The validity and clinical utility of structured diagnoses of antisocial personality disorders with forensic patients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20(3), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. R. (2004). Indirect personality assessment of the violent true believer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. R. (2017). TRAP-18: The terrorist radicalization assessment protocol. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. R. (2018). The operational development and empirical testing of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1481077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. R., & Gill, P. (2016). The lone-actor terrorist and the TRAP-18. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000061
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, J. R., Goodwill, A. M., Meloy, M. J., Amat, G., Martinez, M., & Morgan, M. (2019). Some TRAP-18 indicators discriminate between terrorist attackers and other subjects of national security concern. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 6(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000119
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T. (1987). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory-II: Manual for the MCMI-II. 2nd ed. National Computer Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2021). QAnon: Radical opinion versus radical action. Perspectives on Terrorism, 15(2), 142–146.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Mulay, A. L., & Waugh, M. H. (2019). Forensic applications of the AMPD and case illustration. In C. J. Hopwood, A. L. Mulay, & M. H. Waugh (Eds.), The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 209–220). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neller, D. J. (2019). Foundations of indirect assessment. In M. A. Staal & S. C. Harvey (Eds.), Operational psychology: A new field to support national security and public safety (pp. 211–240). Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Strategic Services Assessment Staff. (1948). Assessment of men: Selection of personnel for the Office of Strategic Services. Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. C., Lee, K. U., & Choi, J. (2016). Factor structure of the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Investigation, 13(2), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2016.13.2.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, J. M. (2005). The psychological assessment of political leaders: With profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, T., Zheng, L., & Meloy, J. R. (2021). DSM-5 cultural and personality assessment of extreme overvalued beliefs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 60(101552), 101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101552
   Google Scholar
• Roaldset, J. O., Hartvig, P., & Bjørkly, S. (2011). V-RISK-10: Validation of a screen for risk of violence after discharge from acute psychiatry. European Psychiatry, 26(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Thomas, K. M., & Ruggero, C. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 20(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Waugh, M. H., & Hopwood, C. J. (2018). Development and validation of personality disorder spectra scales for the MMPI-2-RF. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1407327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, E. D. (2003). Saddam Hussein: Political psychological profiling results relevant to his possession, use, and possible transfer of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to terrorist groups. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 26(5), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100390227962
   Google Scholar
• Shecter, O., & Lang, E. (2011). Identifying personality disorders that are security risks: Field test results (Technical Report TR 11-05). Defense Personnel Security Research Center (PERSEREC).
   Google Scholar
• Shedler, J. (2009). Guide to SWAP-200 interpretation. Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://swapassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Guide-to-SWAP-200-Interpetation-DRAFT6c.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2007). The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701357092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, P. G., Lie Sam Foek-Rambelje, K., Rinne, T., Van Der Heijden, P. T., Kempes, M. M., & Egger, J. I. M. (2021). Personality assessment with the Shedler-Westen assessment procedure 200 in a forensic sample: Criterion validity and contribution to structured forensic clinical judgement. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(5), 736–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2021.1903066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares-Weiser, K., Maayan, N., Bergman, H., Davenport, C., Kirkham, A. J., Grabowski, S., & Adams, C. E. (2015). First rank symptoms for schizophrenia. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1(1), CD010653. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010653.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United States v. Kaczynski, 923 F. Supp. 161 (D. Mont. 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, M. H. (2014). Clinician rated personality disorder level and traits [Unpublished manuscript].
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, M. H., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Pincus, A. L., & Wright, A. G. C. (2017). Psychological assessment with the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders’: Tradition and innovation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P., Schnurr, P. P. (2013). The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 – Standard Form. Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/documents/PCL5_Standard_form.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler memory scale-Revised. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. The American Psychologist, 59(7), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A. (2019). Considering the research: Commentary on "The trait-type dialectic: Construct validity, clinical utility, and the diagnostic process”. Personality Disorders, 10(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar