Dominance and Prestige as Self-Concept Facets

References

• Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 11(2), 150–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierlein, C., Asbrock, F., Kauff, M., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus-3 (KSA-3): Ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritarer Einstellungen [A short scale for measuring three dimensions of authoritarianism]. GESIS.
   Google Scholar
• Blaker, N. M., Rompa, I., Dessing, I. H., Vriend, A. F., Herschberg, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2013). The height leadership advantage in men and women: Testing evolutionary psychology predictions about the perceptions of tall leaders. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212437211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer, K., Sendatzki, R., & Proyer, R. T. (2021). Testing the associations between dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at and romantic jealousy in couples: An APIM analysis. Journal of Personality, 89(5), 883–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. P., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2004). Narcissism and the non-equivalence of self-esteem measures: A matter of dominance.? Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test-und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction in test development]. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bukowski, W. M. (2009). Friendship as process, function, and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 217–231). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buttermore, N. R. (2004). Status, Dominance, or Prestige? Domains of self-esteem as moderators of reactions to an embarrassing situation [Unpublished master’s thesis].
   Google Scholar
• Buttermore, N. (2006 Distinguishing dominance and prestige: Validation of a self-report scale [Paper presentation]. Poster Presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society’s 18th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Case, C. R., Bae, K. K., & Maner, J. K. (2018). To lead or to be liked: When prestige-oriented leaders prioritize popularity over performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(4), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T. (2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). The impact of wealth on prestige and dominance rank relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.792576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 3–27). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, K. E. (2019). Mate retention strategies of dominance-oriented and prestige-oriented romantic partners. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00189-x
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta‐analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, A. V., Green, S. B., Levy, R., Lo, W. J., Scott, L., Svetina, D., & Thompson, M. S. (2010). Evaluation of parallel analysis methods for determining the number of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(6), 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410379332
   Google Scholar
• Dufner, M., Leising, D., & Gebauer, J. E. (2016). Which basic rules underlie social judgments? Agency follows a zero-sum principle and communion follows a non-zero-sum principle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216640902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(7), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370902815673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. M., & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 8(4), 322–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, Z. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2020). Investigating evolutionary models of leadership among recently settled Ethiopian hunter-gatherers. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), 101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnambs, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of dependability coefficients (test–retest reliabilities) for measures of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, M. P., Leckelt, M., & Back, M. D. (2020). Personality predictors of social status attainment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 52–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, T. W., & Harrell, M. S. (1945). Army general classification test scores for civilian occupations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 5(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316444500500303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaven, P. C. (1987). Authoritarianism, dominance, and need for achievement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538708259057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior: Official Journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, 22(3), 165–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydasch, T. (2014). The hagen matrices test (HMT) (Part of [doctoral dissertation thesis]. University of Hagen.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 14(3), 332–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., & Yarmel, P. W. (1987). Intellectual functioning and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immelman, A., & Griebie, A. (2020 The personality profile and leadership style of U.S. president Donald J. Trump in office [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.InTestCom.org
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, I., & Scholl, W. (2016). IAL-K: Entwicklung einer Kurzform der Interpersonalen Adjektivliste [IAL-K: Development of a short form of the Interpersonal Adjective List]. Diagnostica, 62(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 521–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. T., Burk, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. C. (1991). Friendship satisfaction and gender: An examination of sex differences in contributors to friendship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajanus, A., Afshordi, N., & Warneken, F. (2020). Children’s understanding of dominance and prestige in China and the UK. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, K. (2018). The MBESS R package (Version 4.4.3). http://cran.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, R., Heydasch, T., & Schütz, A. (2022). It's all about power: Validation of trait and state versions of the German Personal Sense of Power Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000642
   Google Scholar
• Körner, R., & Schütz, A. (2020). Dominance or prestige: A review of the effects of power poses and other body postures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(8), e12559. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, R., & Schütz, A. (2021). The German standard and short Authentic and Hubristic Pride Scales: Psychometric properties, validity testing, self-other agreement, and linguistic correlates. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, R., Schütz, A., Zverling, E., & Sha’ked, A. (2022). Revisiting the power to forgive: A dyadic approach for determining the relations between power, self-esteem, and forgiveness in romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(7), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211056516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, D. J., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2011). Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, T., Kroll, L., Müters, S., & Stolzenberg, H. (2013). Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland [Measurement of socioeconomic status in a study on adult’s health in Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 56(5-6), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1663-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leising, D., Vogel, D., Waller, V., & Zimmermann, J. (2021). Correlations between person-descriptive items are predictable from the product of their mid-point-centered social desirability values. European Journal of Personality, 35(5), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890207020962331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, K. D. (2006). Interpersonal circumplex measures. In S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 383–400). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, K. D. (2010). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic intervention (pp. 313–324). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417714323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan, K. J., Maner, J. K., & Cheng, J. T. (2022). Two ways to stay at the top: Prestige and dominance are both viable strategies for gaining and maintaining social rank over time. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(10), 1516–1528. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211042319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, L. M., Grosz, M. P., Zimmermann, J., & Back, M. D. (2022). Assessing maladaptive personality in the forensic context: Development and validation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Forensic Faceted Brief Form (PID-5-FFBF). Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(1), 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. E. (2003). Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village. Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 14(2), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1003-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, S. H., Kurtz, J. E., & Houts, D. C. (1996). Four-month test-retest reliability of the MMPI-2 with normal male clergy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(2), 341–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redhead, D., Cheng, J. T., Driver, C., Foulsham, T., & O'Gorman, R. (2019). On the dynamics of social hierarchy: A longitudinal investigation of the rise and fall of prestige, dominance, and social rank in naturalistic task groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Z. C., & Rios, K. (2018). Social hierarchies. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds,), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rueb, J. D., Erskine, H. J., & Foti, R. J. (2008). Intelligence, dominance, masculinity, and self-monitoring: Predicting leadership emergence in a military setting. Military Psychology, 20(4), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600802345139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1998). Assertive, offensive, and defensive self-presentation. A taxonomy. The Journal of Psychology, 132(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., Fehn, T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). Self. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., Marcus, B., & Sellin, I. (2004). Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt [The measurement of narcissism as a personality trait. Diagnostica, 50(4), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenyna, S. W., & Honey, P. L. (2015). Dominance styles mediate sex differences in Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. (1972). Authoritarianism and education: A comparative approach. Sociometry, 35(2), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786619
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder, J. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The dominance dilemma: Do women really prefer dominant mates? Personal Relationships, 15(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderen, E. V., Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLOS One, 8(7), e68967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, M. D., & Grieder, S. (2020). EFAtools: An R package with fast and flexible implementations of exploratory factor analysis tools. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(53), 2521. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02521
   Google Scholar
• Suessenbach, F., Loughnan, S., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Moore, A. B. (2019). The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielmann, I., Akrami, N., Babarović, T., Belloch, A., Bergh, R., Chirumbolo, A., Čolović, P., de Vries, R. E., Dostál, D., Egorova, M., Gnisci, A., Heydasch, T., Hilbig, B. E., Hsu, K.-Y., Izdebski, P., Leone, L., Marcus, B., Međedović, J., Nagy, J., … Lee, K. (2020). The HEXACO–100 across 16 languages: A large-scale test of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(5), 714–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663
   Google Scholar
• Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 558–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 506–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zalk, M., & Denissen, J. (2015). Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 121–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Collani, G., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg [A revised version of the German adaptation of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle Und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1024//0170-1789.24.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Werner, R., & von Collani, G. (2014). Deutscher Aggressionsfragebogen [German aggression questionnaire]. GESIS.
   Google Scholar
• West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(4), 517–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105(2), 230–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkower, Z., Tracy, J. L., Cheng, J. T., & Henrich, J. (2020). Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 89–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, E., & Shen, W. (2019). Can pride be a vice and virtue at work? Associations between authentic and hubristic pride and leadership behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler-Hill, V., Sauls, D., & Malay, P. (2021). Through the eyes of Narcissus: Competitive social worldviews mediate the associations that narcissism has with ideological attitudes. Self and Identity, 20(6), 811–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1779118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short scales–five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar