Feeling Better About Self After Receiving Negative Feedback: When the Sense That Ability Can Be Improved Is Activated

References

• Arneson, J. J., Sackett, P. R., & Beatty, A. S. (2011). Ability–performance relationships in education and employment settings critical tests of the more–is–better and the good–enough hypotheses. Psychological Science, 22, 1336–1342. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 631–646. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S.W. J. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 497–505. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., & Dutton, K. A. (1995). The thrill of victory, the complexity of defeat: Self-esteem and people's emotional reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 712–722. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mindsets matter: A meta–analytic review of the effects of implicit theories on self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. doi: 10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianci, A. M., Klein, H. J., & Seijts, G. H. (2010). The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: The main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 618–630. doi: 10.1037/a0019130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C. R., Dunning, D., & Armor, D. A. (2010). When self affirmations reduce defensiveness: Timing is key. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 947–959. doi: 10.1177/0146167210369557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodgson, P. G., & Wood, J. V. (1998). Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 178–197. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.75.1.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D. (2003). The zealous self-affirmer: How and why the self lurks so pervasively behind social judgment. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 150, pp. 45–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.54.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. (1980). Rational–emotive therapy and cognitive behavior therapy: Similarities and differences. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 325–340. doi: 10.1007/BF01178210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M. (2006). Try feed forward instead of feedback. In M. Goldsmith & L. Lyons (Eds.), Coaching for Leadership (pp. 45–49). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., & Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550–565. doi: 10.1111/1464–0597.00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., DePater, I. E., & Judge, R. (2007). Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self-esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 590–609. doi: 10.1108/02683940710778459
   Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.90.3.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M. & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta–analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P. (2007). Work motivation: History, theories, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 599–612. doi: 10.1177/0146167207312960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta–analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.92.1.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R. W., & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313–336. doi: 10.1080/15298860290106805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14, 227–234. doi: 10.1037/a0035490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2005). Learning versus performance goals: When should each be used? Academy of Management Executive, 19, 124–131. doi: 10.5465/AME.2005.15841964
   Google Scholar
• Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 603–610. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00503-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevincer, A. T., Kluge, L., & Oettingen, G. (2014). Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 36–46. doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9359-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dellen, M. R., Campbell, W. K., Hoyle, R. H., & Bradfield, E. K. (2011). Compensating, resisting, and breaking: A meta–analytic examination of reactions to self-esteem threat. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 51–74. doi: 10.1177/1088868310372950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D. (1978). Affective consequences of causal ascriptions. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research (pp. 59–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar