Corruption as a Propensity: Personality and Motivational Determinants Among Nigerians

References

• Agbiboa, D. E. (2012). Between corruption and development: The political economy of state robbery in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 325–345. doi 10.1007/s10551-011-1093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut, Y., Şendağ, S., Birinci, G., Kılıçer, K., Şahin, M. C., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2008). Exploring the types and reasons of Internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS). Computers & Education, 51, 463–473. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185–201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18–26. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00778.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84–93. doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andershed, H., Gustafson, S. B., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2002). The usefulness of self-reported psychopathy-like traits in the study of antisocial behaviour among non-referred adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 16, 383–402. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrigo, B. A., & Claussen, N. (2003). Police corruption and psychological testing: A strategy for preemployment screening. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 272–290. doi:10.1177/0306624×03047003003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., & Hongladarom, C. (2014). Bribe taking acceptability and bribe payment among Thai organizational employees: The mediating effect of reciprocity obligation. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3, 184. doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000018
   Google Scholar
• Ashour, A. (2006). Combating corruption: Systemic and strategic perspectives. UNDP POGAR concept paper for United Nations Development Programme, Beirut.
   Google Scholar
• Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2004). Psychology and law (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R, & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489–520. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424. doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P., & Klein, U. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology, 55, 220–233. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonigen, D. M. (2010). Explaining the relationship between age and crime: Contributions from the developmental literature on personality. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, L. R., Becker, L. K., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behavior dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 537–541. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boduszek, D., Dhingra, K., Stander, C., Ioannou, M., & Palmer, D. (2014). Latent classes of criminal intent associated with criminal behaviour. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2, 92–102. doi:10.5114/cipp.2014.44305
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, N. A., Burns, G. N., Stewart, S. M., & Gruys, M. L. (2011). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as moderators of the relationship between neuroticism and counterproductive work behaviors: A constructive replication. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 320–330. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. J. (2006). What are we trying to measure? Reviewing the basics of corruption definition. In C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption (pp. 57–79). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Barker, E. D., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Eysenck's personality dimensions as predictors of male adolescent trajectories of physical aggression, theft and vandalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1309–1320. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin J. M., & Ford M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewardsjointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 4, 980–1008. doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin, B. (2003). Breaking the silence on white collar crime. Risk Management, 50, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. M., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Personality, integrity, and white collar crime: A construct validity study. Personnel Psychology, 46, 295–311. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00875.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2008). The personality of corruption a national-level analysis. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 353–385. doi:10.1177/1069397108321904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of tshe NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursey, D. H., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Public service motivation measurement testing an abridged version of Perry's proposed scale. Administration & Society, 39, 547–568. doi:10.1177/009539970730363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, M. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Personality and counterproductive behavior workplace behavior. In M. Barrick, & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass-Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., & Ruhe, J. A. (2003). Perceptions of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 275–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47, 259. doi.org/10.1037/a0020729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144, 215–238. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9513-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, S. (1997). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of human nature. Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty (pp. 109–121). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecified structural or measurement model components: rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. C. (2004). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 295–330. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K., & Okruhlik, G. (1991). The political dimensions of corruption cleanups: A framework for analysis. Comparative Politics, 77–95. doi:10.2307/422202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giluk, T. L., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2015). Big Five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of the Big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73–96. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M. A., & Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2008). On the individual decisions to commit corruption: A methodological complement. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 65, 357–372. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruys, M. L. (2000). The dimensionality of deviant employee behavior in the workplace. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2008). Partners in crime A study of the relationship between female offenders and their co-defendants. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8, 147–164. doi:10.1177/1748895808088992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 329–337. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 233–247. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.8 for windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2009). Testing the structure of public service motivation in Korea: A research note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 839–851. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Schmutte, P. S., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Campbell, K., & Silva, P. A. (1994). Personality traits are linked to crime among men and women: evidence from a birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 328.
   Google Scholar
• Kruh, I. P., Frick, P. J., & Clements, C. B. (2005). Historical and personality correlates to the violence patterns of juveniles tried as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 69–96. doi:10.1177/0093854804270629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO personality inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182–191. doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méon, P. G., & Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?. Public Choice, 122, 69–97. doi:10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta analytic review. Criminology, 39, 765–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 168–178. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1469–1480. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mõttus, R., Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2010). An attempt to validate national mean scores of Conscientiousness: No necessarily paradoxical findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 630–640. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. (2006). Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, 591–622. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153–200.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41, 129–145. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229. doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, S., & Fischer, R. (2012). Predicting societal corruption across time: Values, wealth, or institutions? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 644–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, J., & Willing, R. (2003, May 12). Prison time gets harder for white-collar crooks. USA Today, p. 1A.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Ezama, D., Prelec, D., & Dunfield, D. (2013). Motivation, money, prestige and cheats. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 367–373. Available online at http://www.davidpascualezama.com/uploads/1/5/6/5/15655300/1-s2.0-s0167268113000607-main.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perri, F. S. (2011). White-collar criminals: The “Kinder, gentler” offender? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 217–241. doi:10.1002/jip.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, M. (1997). Defining political corruption. Political Studies, 45, 436–62. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, M. (2006). Corruption definition and measurement. In C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption (pp. 45–56). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafter, N. (2006) Shots in the mirror: Crime films and society (2nd edn). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in english and german. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572. doi:10.2307/256693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–164). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., & Koetzle, W. (2000). Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade. International Studies Quarterly, 44, 31–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shacklock, A., Sampford, C., & Connors, C. (eds.) (2006). Introduction. In Measuring corruption. London, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 599–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seleim, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). The relationship between culture and corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 165–184. doi/abs/10.1108/14691930910922978
   Google Scholar
• Tay, L., Herian, M. N., & Diener, E. (2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being, whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 751–759. doi:10.1177/1948550614528544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. R., Ward, D. A., & Grasmick, H. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333–365. doi:10.1023/B:JOQC.0000005439.45614.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief- to medium-length Big Five and Big Six questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice, 4, 33–83.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399–457. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 213–226. doi.org/10.1037/a0015167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner M. J. (2014), An investigation of big five personality and propensity to commit white-collar crime. In B. S. Donna (ed.), Advances in accounting behavioral research (Vol 17, pp. 57–94). United Kingdom: Emerald Group
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, J. L., & De Vries, R. E. (2012). Traits and states: Integrating personality and affect into a model of criminal decision making. Criminology, 50, 637–671. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi, A. T., Pickering, L. E., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. (2001). An empirical test of a general theory of crime: A four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 91–131. doi:10.1177/0022427801038002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vian, T. (2008). Review of corruption in the health sector: theory, methods and interventions. Health Policy and Planning, 23, 83–94. doi:10.1093/heapol/czm048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vian, T., Brinkerhoff, D. W., Feeley, F. G., Salomon, M., & Vien, N. T. K. (2012). Confronting corruption in the health sector in Vietnam: patterns and prospects. Public Administration and Development, 32, 49–63. doi:10.1002/pad.1607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 243–257. doi:10.1080/10683160410001662744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 87–107. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, R. P. (2004). Delinquent behavior and the five-factor model: Hiding in the adaptive landscape. Individual Differences Research, 2, 38–62.
   Google Scholar
• Zaloznaya, M. (2014). The social psychology of corruption: Why it does not exist and why it should. Sociology Compass, 8, 187–202. doi:10.1111/soc4.12120
   Google Scholar