Relationships between Ambivalent Sexism and the Five Moral Foundations in Domestic Violence: Is it a Matter of Fairness and Authority?

References

• Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, M. E., Robyak, J., Torosian, E. J., & Hummer, J. (2006). A study of male veterans' beliefs toward domestic violence in a batterers intervention program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1111–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260506290418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eades, R. A. (2003). Ambivalent sexism as a predictor of severity of domestic violence by male offenders. (Order No. AAI3095654). Available from PsycINFO. (620253715; 2003-95024-326). Retrieved from http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/checkip.php?/docview/620253715?accountid=14514
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2012). Dehumanization, demonization, and morality shifting: Paths to moral certainty in extremist violence. Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty (pp. 165–182). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444344073.ch10.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 530–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 70–88). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022736.005
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13091-001
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the Moral Domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The innate mind Volume 3: Foundations and the future (pp. 367–391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 283–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 289–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 82–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, B., Viki, G. T., & Power, C. (2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54, 565–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakalh-Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, I. H., Aquino, K., Koleva, S., & Graham, J. (2014). The moral ties that bind…Even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25, 1554–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614534450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamawaki, N., Ostenson, J., & Brown, C. R. (2009). The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception: A study between Japanese and American college students. Violence Against Women, 15, 1126–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801209340758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar