The Conceptualization of Team Flow

References

• Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the competitive context: An examination of person–situation interactions. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1615–1635. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00594.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Admiraal, W., Huizenga, J., Akkerman, S., & Dam, G. T. (2011). The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1185–1194. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–56). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2007). Inner work life. Harvard Business Review, 85(5), 72–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. L. (1994). The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the united states. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, A. C. (2008). The fragility of group flow: The experiences of two small groups in a middle school mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(2), 101–115. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123–154. doi:10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–70. doi:10.1037/h0093718
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubé, C., Brunelle, E., & Rousseau, V. (2014). Flow experience and team performance: The role of team goal commitment and information exchange. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 120–130. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9365-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 189–204. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 26–44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. doi:10.1108/13620430810870476
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Emmerik, H. V., & Euwema, M. C. (2006). Crossover of Burnout and Engagement in Work Teams. Work and Occupations, 33(4), 464–489. doi:10.1177/0730888406291310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Oerlemans, W., Demerouti, E., Slot, B. B., & Ali, D. K. (2011). Flow and performance: A study among talented Dutch soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(4), 442–450. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bardram, J. E., & Hansen, T. R. (2010). Context-based workplace awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 19(2), 105–138. doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9110-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. (2015). The influence of flow on standard and adaptive performance in teams (Master's Thesis). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, C. A., Braun, C. C., & Morgan, Jr., B. B. (1997). Team workload: Its meaning and measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, J., & Haworth, J. (2002). Wellbeing and flow in sample of male and female office workers. Leisure Studies, 21(3–4), 249–263. http://doi.org/10.1080/0261436021000030687 doi:10.1080/0261436021000030687
   Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 441–470. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2009). Dynamics of flow: A nonlinear perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 665–684. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9113-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2011). Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within-individual variability using a complexity science approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 627–651. doi:10.1002/job.747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Kanfer, R. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223–267. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. C., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. (2010). Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 225–244. doi:10.1080/13594320143000654
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business: Leadership, flow, and the making of meaning. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In R. Dienstbier & J. E. Jacobs (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation, 1992, 40, Developmental Perspectives on motivation (pp. 57–97). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delarue, A., Van Hootegem, G., Procter, S., & Burridge, M. (2008). Teamworking and organizational performance: A review of survey-based research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(2), 127–148. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Sonnentag, S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 276–295. doi:10.1002/job.760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445–455. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). The relationship between innovation and subjective wellbeing. Research Policy, 41(8), 1489–1498. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 107–114).
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & O'Shea, P. G. (2006). What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(4), 249–271. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming transcendence through organizing. Communication Research, 17(2), 139–164. doi:10.1177/009365090017002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Stinglhamber, F., Shanock, L., & Randall, A. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 755–775. doi:10.1002/job.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Gilder, D. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158–172. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeser, S., & Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2012). Historical lines and an overview of current research on flow. In S. Engeser (Eds.), Advances in flow research (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group dynamics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullagar, C. J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2009). Flow at work: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 595–615. doi:10.1348/096317908X357903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. E., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gevers, J. M. P. (2004). It's about time we align: Meeting deadlines in project teams (Doctoral Dissertation). Eindhoven University of Technology. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.6100/IR580471
   Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beauien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Matthew, J. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307–338. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., & Salas, E. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 87–106. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, MA: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.16387885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., Wageman, R., Ruddy, T. M., & Ray, C. R. (2000). Team effectiveness in theory and practice. In C. Cooper & E. A. Locke (Eds.), Industrial and organizational psychology: Theory and practice (pp. 109–129). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, E., & Hurford, A. (2007). Combining collaborative workspaces with tablet computing: Research in learner engagement and conditions of flow. Proceedings of ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI, Session T3C, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyne, K., Pavlas, D., & Salas, E. (2011). An investigation on the effects of flow state on team process and outcomes. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 475–479. doi:10.1177/1071181311551098
   Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 74–86. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00238
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A. (1995). Factors influencing the occurrence of flow state in elite athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 138–166. doi:10.1080/10413209508406962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., Kimiecik, J. C., Ford, S. K., & Marsh, H. W. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20(4), 358–378. doi:10.1123/jsep.20.4.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, A. P., Krompinger, J., & Baime, M. J. (2007). Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(2), 109–119. doi:10.3758/CABN.7.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1992). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, M., Anderson, G., Dean, D. L., & Gaskin, J. (2014). The effects of team flow on performance: A video game experiment. Proceedings of SIGHCI 2014. Paper 13, Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/sighci2014/13
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74. doi:10.2307/256874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. J., & Mulvey, P. W. (1995). Two investigations of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(1), 44–53. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403–437. doi:10.1177/014920639402000206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K. U., Pihlanto, P., & Vanharanta, H. (2003). Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 281–290. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00030-3
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2012). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, 2nd ed., pp. 333–375). London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Landhäußer, A., & Keller, J. (2012). Flow and its affective, cognitive, and performance-related consequences. In S. Engeser (Eds.), Advances in flow research (pp. 65–85). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J. R. (2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221. doi:10.1037/h0026570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. Strategic Government Resources. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–1265. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Harley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 459–473). New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1984). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works! Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., & Panzer, F. J. (2004). The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance, 17(1), 25–41. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotto, M., Roos, J., & Victor, B. (2007). Collective virtuosity in organizations: A study of peak performance in an orchestra. Journal of Management Studies, 44(3), 388–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic measurement of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57–75. doi:10.1177/001872676501800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275–310. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00512.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. Advances in Group Processes, 9, 237–280.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (Vol 2, pp. 11–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 195–206). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A Review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285–1301. doi:10.2307/256673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, B. Z., Kouzes, J. M., & Schmidt, W. H. (1985). Shared values make a difference: An empirical test of corporate culture. Human Resource Management, 24(3), 293–309. doi:10.1002/hrm.3930240305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. W. (2003). Nuclear weapons and daily deadlines: The energy and tension of flow in knowledge work (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. W. (2005). Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 610–641. doi:10.2189/asqu.50.4.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). The development of the person: An experiential perspective. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 465–515). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ready, D. A., & Truelove, E. (2011). The power of collective ambition. Harvard Business Review, 89(12), 94–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, W. C. (1972). Communication within the organization: An interpretative review of theory and research. New York, NY: Industrial Communication Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, F. (1991). Flow-experience when motorcycling: A study of a special human condition. In R. Brendicke (Eds.), Safety, environment, future. Proceedings of the 1991 International Motorcycle Conference (forschungsheft nr 7) (pp. 349–362). Bochum, Germany: Institut für Zweiradsicherheit (ifZ).
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2011). The effectiveness of teams in organizations: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2749–2769. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.573971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1997). Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 515–546. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, W. (2001). An examination of flow state occurrence in college athletes. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 24(1), 83–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-8854-8
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & Cifre, E. (2014). Flowing together: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups. The Journal of Psychology, 148(4), 435–455. doi:10.1080/00223980.2013.806290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 471–499. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 540–547. doi:10.1518/001872008X288457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., & Fiore, S. M. (2004). Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 123–136. doi:10.1518/001872095779049525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, I. (1988). Bosozoku: Flow in Japanese motorcycle gangs. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 92–117). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165. doi:10.1177/0305735606061850
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893–917. doi:10.1002/job.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (2002). The problem with ‘awareness’: Introductory remarks on awareness in CSCW'. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3–4), 285–298. doi:10.1023/A:1021272909573
   Google Scholar
• Schüler, J. (2012). The dark side of the moon. In S. Engeser (Eds.), Advances in flow research (pp. 123–137). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schüler, J., & Pfenninger, M. (2011). Flow impairs risk perception in kayakers. In B. D. Geranto (Eds.), Sport Psychology (pp. 237–246). New York, NY: Nova Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2000). The effects of goal setting and group size on performance in a social dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 32(2), 104–116. doi:10.1037/h0087105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E., Robbin, R., & Belser, J. R. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, K. Y. (2010). Work relationships that flow: Examining the interpersonal flow experience, knowledge sharing, and organizational commitment (Doctoral Dissertation). Claremont Graduate University. Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/34/36/3436590.html
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55. doi:10.1177/0149206305277792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trausan-Matu, S., Stahl, G., & Sarmiento, J. (2006). Polyphonic support for collaborative learning. In Y. A. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs, & E. Gómez-Sánchez (Eds.), Proceedings of 12^th International CRIWG 2006 (pp. 132–139) Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), The blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 410–427). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ullén, F., de Manzano, Ö., Almeida, R., Magnusson, P. K. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nakamura, J., & Madison, G. (2012). Proneness for psychological flow in everyday life: Associations with personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 167–172. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. (2005). Team diagnostic survey development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 373–398. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305281984 doi:10.1177/0021886305281984
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. J. (2010). Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 3–11. doi:10.1080/17439760903271116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weggeman, M. C. D.P. (2007). Leidinggeven aan professionals? Niet doen!: Over kenniswerkers, vakmanschap en innovatie. Schiedam, the Netherlands: Scriptum.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381. doi:10.2307/2393372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, A. J. (1988). Self-esteem and optimal experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 327–341). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). Measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Canada: Sports Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2004). The role of psychological well-being in job performance: A fresh look at an age-old quest. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 338–351. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumeta, L., Basabe, N., Wlodarczyk, A., Bobowik, M., & Paez, D. (2016). Shared flow and positive collective gatherings. Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 717–727.
   Google Scholar