An Examination of Aggressive Beliefs and Attitudes in Relation to Political Affiliation and Candidate Endorsement in the United States

References

• Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1–14. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing, M. N., LeBreton, J. M., Davison, H. K., Migetz, D. Z., & James, L. R. (2007). Integrating implicit and explicit social cognitions for enhanced personality assessment: A general framework for choosing measurement and statistical methods. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 346–389. doi:10.1177/1094428106289396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, B. C., Ko, C. H. E., & James, L. R. (2007). Implicit and explicit personality: A test of a channeling hypothesis for aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1299–1319. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 828–845. doi:10.1037/a0038510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1(2), 131–163. doi:10.1177/109442819812001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., McIntyre, M. D., Glisson, C. A., Green, P. D., Patton, T. W., LeBreton, J. M., … Williams, L. J. (2005). A conditional reasoning measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 69–99. doi:10.1177/1094428104272182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Muliak, S. S., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307–321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. D., & Wronski, J. (2015). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology, 36(1), 35–53. doi:10.1111/pops.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 633–645. doi:10.1037/a0025560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraniss, D. & Samuels, R. (2016). The great unsettling. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/looking-for-america-the-great-unsettling/2016/03/17/e9cb3eaa-e544-11e5-bc08-3e03a5b41910_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A., & Craig, S. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. doi:10.1037/a0028085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanical Turk Monitor. (2016). http://www.mturk-tracker.com
   Google Scholar
• Michel, J. S., Pace, V., Edun, A., Sawhney, E., & Thomas, J. (2014). Development and validation of an explicit aggressive beliefs and attitudes scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 327–338. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.832260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. doi:10.2307/2337038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Partisanship and political animosity in 2016. http://www.people-press.org/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2016). The electoral landscape of 2016. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 50–71. doi:10.1177/0002716216658922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womick, J., Rothmund, T., Azevedo, F., King, L. A., & Jost, J. T. (2018). Group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression predict support for Donald Trump in the 2016 US presidential election. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 643–652. doi:10.1177/1948550618778290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar