Methods for Selecting the Best Process

References

• Baten, W. D., Tack, P. I. and Baeder, H. A. (1958), “Testing for Differences,” Industrial Quality Control, Vol. 14, No. 7, January, pp. 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, R. E. (1954), “A Single-Sample Multiple Decision Procedure for Ranking Means of Normal Populations with Known Variances,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, R. E., Dunnett, C. W. and Sobel, M. (1954), “A Two-Sample Multiple Decision Procedure for Ranking Means of Normal Populations with a Common Unknown Variance,” Biometrika, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 170–176.
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, R. E. and Sobel, M. (1954), “A Single-Sample Multiple-Decision Procedure for Ranking Variances of Normal Populations,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R. J. and Gupta, S. S. (1977), “On the Probabilities of Rankings of k Populations with Applications,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Dudewicz, E. J. (1980), “Ranking (Ordering) and Selection: An Overview of How to Select the Best,” Technometrics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. D., Olkin, I. and Sobel, M. (1977), Selecting and Ordering Populations: A New Statistical Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. D., Olkin, I. and Sobel, M. (1979), “An Introduction to Ranking and Selection,” The American Statistician, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 185–195.
   Google Scholar
• Girshick, M. A. (1946), “Contributions to Sequential Analysis: I,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. S. (1956), “On a Decision Rule for a Problem in Ranking Means,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series, No. 150, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. S. and Panchapakesan, S. (1980), Multiple Decision Procedures: Theory and Methodology of Selecting and Ranking Populations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. S. and Sobel, M. (1957), “On a Statistic Which Arises in Selection and Ranking Problems,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 957–967.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, C. R. (1956), “Fundamentals of Analysis of Variance,” Industrial Quality Control, Vol. 13, No. 2, August, pp. 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C., Naylor, T. H. and Seaks, T. G. (1972), “The Use of Multiple Ranking Procedures to Analyze Simulations of Management Systems: A Tutorial,” Management Science, Applications Series, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. B245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Mamrak, S. A. and Amer, P. D. (1979), Computer Science & Technology: A Methodology for the Selection of Interactive Computer Services, U.S. Government Printing Office, National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 500–44, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, T. H. (1971), Computer Simulation Experiments With Models of Economic Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, T. H., Wertz, K. and Wonnacott, T. H. (1967), “Methods for Analyzing Data from Computer Simulations,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 10, pp. 703–710.
   Google Scholar
• Panchapakesan, S. (1980), Review of Selecting and Ordering Populations, by J. D. Gibbons, I. Olkin and M. Sobel, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 239–240.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. W. and Taylor, R. E. (1970), Simulation and Analysis of Industrial Systems, Richard Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Seal, K. C. (1958), “On Ranking Parameters of Scale in Type III Populations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 164–175.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, A. (1947), Sequential Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wernimont, G. (1947), “Quality Control in the Chemical Laboratory,” Industrial Quality Control, Vol. 3, No. 6, May, pp. 5–11.
   Google Scholar