Research Issues and Ideas in Statistical Process Control

References

• Adams, B. M. and Lin, Q. (1998). “Monitoring Autocorrelated Processes: Control Charts for Auto-correlated Data”. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ajmani, V.; Randles, R.; and Vining, G. (1998). “Robust Multivariate Control Charts”. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, S. (1998). “Bibliography and Review of Distribution-Free Quality Control Charts”. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, D. (1993). “Is Industrial Statistics Out of Control?” (with discussion). Statistical Science 8, pp. 356–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borror, C. M.; Montgomery, D. C.; and Runger, G. C. (1997). “Confidence Intervals for Variance Components from Gauge Capability Studies”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 13, pp. 361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1990). “Commentary on ‘Communications Between Statisticians and Engineers/Physical Scientists’”. Technometrics 32, pp. 251–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1994). “Statistics and Quality Improvement”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 157, pp. 209–229.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1995). “Scientific Statistics—The Way Ahead”. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P.; Bisgaard, S.; and Fung, C. (1988). “An Explanation and Critique of Taguchi's Contributions to Quality Engineering”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 4, pp. 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P.; Coleman, D. E.; and Baxley, R. V., Jr. (1997). “A Comparison of Statistical Process Control and Engineering Process Control”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 128–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. and Luceno, A. (1997). Statistical Control by Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Burdick, R. K. and Larsen, G. A. (1997). “Confidence Intervals on Measures of Variability in R & R Studies”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, S.; Van der Laan, P.; and Bakir, S. (1999). “Nonparametric Statistical Process Control: An Overview”. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. T. and Fricker, R. D., Jr. (1998). “Nonparametric Control Charts for Multivariate Data”. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (1997). “The Mean and Standard Deviation of the Run Length Distribution of X̄ Charts When Control Limits Are Estimated”. Statistica Sinica 7, pp. 789–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. (1997). “X̄ Chart with Variable Sample Size and Sampling Intervals”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, S. V.; Hawkins, D. M.; Reynolds, M. R., Jr.; and Yashchin, E. (1997). “Process Control and Statistical Inference”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Castillo, E.; Grayson, J.; Runger, G.; and Montgomery, D. C. (1996). “A Review of SPC Methods for Short Runs”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 25, pp. 2723–2737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Center for Advanced Engineering Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1993). The New Economics for Industry, Government, and Education. Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. J. (1956). “The Economic Design of X̄-Charts Used to Maintain Current Control of a Process”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 51, pp. 228–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faltin, F. W.; Mastrangelo, C. M.; Runger, G. C.; and Ryan, T. P. (1997). “Considerations in the Monitoring of Autocorrelated and Independent Data”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 131–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, D. Y. T. and Lawless, J. F. (1998). “The Analysis of Process Variation Transmission with Multivariate Measurements”. Statistica Sinica 8, pp. 151–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, B. K.; Reynolds, M. R., Jr.; and Hui, Y. V. (1981). “Shewhart X̄-Charts with Estimated Process Variance”. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 10, pp. 1797–1822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibra, I. N. (1975). “Recent Developments in Control Chart Techniques”. Journal of Quality Technology 7, pp. 183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B. (1998). “Farewell Fusillade: An Unvarnished Opinion on the State of the Quality Profession”. Quality Progress April, pp. 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. M. (1991). “Multivariate Quality Control Based on Regression-Adjusted Variables”. Technometrics 33, pp. 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. M. (1995). “Discussion of Q-Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 27, pp. 324–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. M. and Olwell, D. H. (1998). Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. and Case, K. E. (1994). “Economic Design of Control Charts: A Literature Review for 1981–1991”. Journal of Quality Technology 26, pp. 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. A. and Woodall, W. H. (1998). “The Performance of Bootstrap Control Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 30, pp. 362–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keats, J. B.; Del Castillo, E.; von Collani, E.; and Saniga, E. (1997). “Economic Modeling for Statistical Process Control”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 144–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesar, P. J. (1993). “The Relevance of Research on Statistical Process Control to the Total Quality Movement”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 10, pp. 317–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kourti, T. and MacGregor, J. F. (1996). “Multivariate SPC Methods for Process and Product Monitoring”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 409–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T. L. (1995). “Sequential Changepoint Detection in Quality Control and Dynamical Systems” (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57, pp. 613–658.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. (1998). “Analysis of Variation Transmission in Manufacturing Processes”. Presented at the Spring Research Conference on Statistics in Industry and Technology of the ASA/IMS, Santa Fe, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, C. A. and Montgomery, D. C. (1995). “A Review of Multivariate Control Charts”. IIE Transactions 27, pp. 800–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. M. and Saccucci, M. S. (1990). “Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Charts: Properties and Enhancements” (with discussion). Technometrics 32, pp. 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, J. F. (1987). “Interfaces Between Process Control and On-Line Statistical Process Control”. Computing and Systems Technology Division Communications 10, pp. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, J. F. (1997). “Using On-Line Process Data to Improve Quality: Challenges for Statisticians”. International Statistical Review 65, pp. 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. L.; Champ, C. W.; Tracy, N. D.; Wierda, S. J.; and Young, J. C. (1997). “Assessment of Multivariate Process Control Techniques”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 140–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo, C. M. (1998). “Multivariate Process Monitoring of Autocorrelated Data”. Presented at the VIth International Workshop on Intelligent Statistical Quality Control, Wurzburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo, C. M.; Runger, G. C.; and Montgomery, D. C. (1996). “Statistical Process Monitoring with Principal Components”. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 12, pp. 203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (1992). “The Use of Statistical Process Control and Design of Experiments in Product and Process Improvement”. IIE Transactions 24, pp. 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (1996). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. (1998). “A Perspective on Models and the Quality Sciences: Some Challenges and Future Directions”. W. J. Youden Memorial Address presented at the 42nd Annual Fall Technical Conference of the American Statistical Association and the American Society for Quality, Corning, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C.; Keats, J. B.; Runger, G. C.; and Messina, W. S. (1994). “Integrating Statistical Process Control and Engineering Process Control”. Journal of Quality Technology 26, pp. 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. and Mastrangelo, C. M. (1991). “Some Statistical Process Control Methods for Autocorrelated Data” (with discussion). Journal of Quality Technology 23, pp. 179–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. (1993a). “Gauge Capability and Designed Experiments, Part I: Basic Methods”. Quality Engineering 6, pp. 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C. (1993b). “Gauge Capability and Designed Experiments, Part II: Experimental Design Models and Variance Component Estimation”. Quality Engineering 6, pp. 289–305.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. and Woodall, W. H., Eds. (1997). “A Discussion on Statistically-Based Process Monitoring and Control”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 121–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, V. N., Ed. (1992). “Taguchi's Parameter Design: A Panel Discussion”. Technometrics 34, pp. 127–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neave, H. R. (1990). The Deming Dimension. SPC Press, Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, A. C.; Rodriguez, R. N.; Spiring, F. A.; and Wheeler, D. J. (1997). “Some Perspectives and Challenges for Control Chart Methods”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 122–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappanastos, E. A. and Adams, B. M. (1996). “Alternative Designs of the Hodges-Lehmann Control Chart”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. S. (1935). The Application of Statistical Methods to Industrial Standardisation and Quality Control. British Standards Institution, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. S. (1967). “Some Notes on W. A. Shewhart's Influence on the Application of Statistical Methods in Great Britain”. Industrial Quality Control August, pp. 81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Quesenberry, C. P. (1993). “The Effect of Sample Size on Estimated Limits for X and X Control Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 25, pp. 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., Jr.; Amin, R. W.; and Arnold, J. C. (1990). “CUSUM Charts with Variable Sampling Intervals” (with discussion). Technometrics 32, pp. 371–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. N. (1992). “Recent Developments in Process Capability Analysis”. Journal of Quality Technology 24, pp. 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runger, G. C.; Willemain, T. R.; Grayson, J. M.; and Messina, W. S. (1997). “Statistical Process Control for Massive Datasets”. Presented at the 41st Annual Fall Technical Conference of the American Statistical Association and the American Society for Quality, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. P. (2000). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, T. R.; Pignatiello, J. J., Jr.; and Calvin, J. A. (1998). “Identifying the Time of a Step Change with X Control Charts”. Quality Engineering 10, pp. 521–527.
   Google Scholar
• Saniga, E. (1989). “Economic Statistical Control Chart Designs with an Application to X̄ and R Charts”. Technometrics 31, pp. 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoumbos, Z. G. (1999). “The Detection and Estimation of the Change-Point in a Discrete-Time Stochastic System”. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 17, pp. 637–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagaras, G. (1998). “A Survey of Recent Developments in the Design of Adaptive Control Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 30, pp. 212–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, P. F. and Barnett, N. S. (1996a). “Dispersion Control for Multivariate Processes”. Australian Journal of Statistics 38, pp. 235–251.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, P. F. and Barnett, N. S. (1996b). “Dispersion Control for Multivariate Processes—Some Comparisons”. Australian Journal of Statistics 38, pp. 253–273.
   Google Scholar
• Vance, L. C. (1983). “A Bibliography of Statistical Quality Control Techniques, 1970–1980”. Journal of Quality Technology 15, pp. 59–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Wiel, S. A.; Tucker, W. T.; Faltin, F. W.; and Doganaksoy, N. (1992). “Algorithmic Statistical Process Control: Concepts and an Application”. Technometrics 34, pp. 286–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardeman, S. B. (1986). “The Legitimate Role of Inspection in Modern SQC”. The American Statistician 40, pp. 325–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardeman, S. B. and Van Valkenburg (1999). “Two-Way Random-Effects Analyses and Gauge R & R Studies”. Technometrics 41, pp. 202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierda, S. J. (1994). “Multivariate Statistical Process Control—Recent Results and Directions for Future Research”. Statistica Neerlandica 48, pp. 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Willemain, T. R. and Runger, G. C. (1996). “Designing Control Charts Using an Empirical Reference Distribution”. Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. (1987). “Conflicts Between Deming's Philosophy and the Economic Design of Control Charts” in Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 3 edited by H.-J. Lenz, G. B. Wetherill, and P.-Th. Wilrich. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 242–248.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. (1997). “Control Charts Based on Attribute Data: Bibliography and Review”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp. 172–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. (1999). “Controversies and Contradictions in Statistical Process Control”. Presented at the 50th Anniversary Meeting of the Statistics Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. and Adams, B. M. (1998). “Statistical Process Control” in Handbook of Statistical Methods for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd ed. edited by Harrison Wadsworth, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H.; Crowder, S. V.; and Wade, M. R. (1995). “Discussion of Q-Charts”. Journal of Quality Technology 27, pp. 328–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. and Faltin, F. W. (1993). “Autocorrelated Data and SPC”. ASQC Statistics Division Newsletter 13, pp. 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. and Faltin, F. W. (1996). “An Overview and Perspective on Control Charting” in Statistical Applications in Process Control edited by J. B. Keats and D. C. Montgomery. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY. pp. 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yashchin, E. (1997). “Change-Point Models in Industrial Applications” in Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress of Nonlinear Analysts 30, pp. 3997–4006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashchin, E. (1998). “Monitoring of High Intensity Data Streams”. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Zacks, S. (1991). “Detection and Change-Point Problems” in Handbook of Sequential Analysis edited by B. K. Ghosh and P. K. Sen. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, L. S.; Montgomery, D. C.; and Runger, G. C. (1998). “Evaluation of a Three-State Adaptive Sample Size X-Bar Control Chart”. International Journal of Production Research 36, pp. 733–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar